New Posts For Thread: Tingle Creek appeal issue.https://community.betfair.com/irish_sports/go/thread/view/94110/30624829/tingle-creek-appeal-issueI hope the connections of Special Tiara forego their right to appeal. On the face of it their chances are slim to zero. These type of accidental interferences happen frequently in racing and one should be big enough to take them on the chin as partTony McCoy was a great man to jump across rivals at the last at midweek meetings. Felt aggrieved for HDB but opening myself up to the full picture now, I can see there's little point pursuing this.https://community.betfair.com/irish_sports/go/thread/view/94110/30624829/tingle-creek-appeal-issue?post_id=547068919#547068919Tony McCoy was a great man to jump across rivals at the last at midweek meetings. Felt aggrieved for HDB but opening myself up to the full picture now, I can see there's little point pursuing this.Mon, 07 Dec 2015 18:14:54 -0600If the race was in Mallow and Special Tiara was Cork trained he would have got the racehttps://community.betfair.com/irish_sports/go/thread/view/94110/30624829/tingle-creek-appeal-issue?post_id=547068887#547068887If the race was in Mallow and Special Tiara was Cork trained he would have got the raceMon, 07 Dec 2015 18:06:31 -0600How anyone can say that Special Tiara was a 1/10 shot if no interference had taking place when the lowest he was matched in running was 1.51 is beyond me.That is quite a discrepancy with how the market perceived the race directly prior to the last fehttps://community.betfair.com/irish_sports/go/thread/view/94110/30624829/tingle-creek-appeal-issue?post_id=547068211#547068211How anyone can say that Special Tiara was a 1/10 shot if no interference had taking place when the lowest he was matched in running was 1.51 is beyond me.That is quite a discrepancy with how the market perceived the race directly prior to the last feMon, 07 Dec 2015 16:35:06 -0600As the rule is interpreted in the UK there is not a chance in hell of it being overturned.https://community.betfair.com/irish_sports/go/thread/view/94110/30624829/tingle-creek-appeal-issue?post_id=547065963#547065963As the rule is interpreted in the UK there is not a chance in hell of it being overturned.Mon, 07 Dec 2015 12:25:31 -0600Hello RA,they are two different things,it was always likely that the winner wasn't going to lose it hence the 1/10,if there was no interference and this is only conjecture on my part ST would have been 85% the likely winner imo and that is based on 1https://community.betfair.com/irish_sports/go/thread/view/94110/30624829/tingle-creek-appeal-issue?post_id=547065947#547065947Hello RA,they are two different things,it was always likely that the winner wasn't going to lose it hence the 1/10,if there was no interference and this is only conjecture on my part ST would have been 85% the likely winner imo and that is based on 1Mon, 07 Dec 2015 12:23:45 -0600R.A. the reason SDG was that price is simply the market knowing the stewards would not change the result. I think they call it freemoney on the main forum. Sadly the only reason that rule will be changed l.E. winner keeping the race no matter what Ohttps://community.betfair.com/irish_sports/go/thread/view/94110/30624829/tingle-creek-appeal-issue?post_id=547065929#547065929R.A. the reason SDG was that price is simply the market knowing the stewards would not change the result. I think they call it freemoney on the main forum. Sadly the only reason that rule will be changed l.E. winner keeping the race no matter what OMon, 07 Dec 2015 12:19:18 -0600pa, your analysis of the 85% odds in favour of ST winning in direct contrast to how the market favoured SDG to keep the race -1/9 and 1/8 to keep the race I recall. As unjust as the present system is, at least it's fairly consistent and predictable ahttps://community.betfair.com/irish_sports/go/thread/view/94110/30624829/tingle-creek-appeal-issue?post_id=547065859#547065859pa, your analysis of the 85% odds in favour of ST winning in direct contrast to how the market favoured SDG to keep the race -1/9 and 1/8 to keep the race I recall. As unjust as the present system is, at least it's fairly consistent and predictable aMon, 07 Dec 2015 12:02:56 -0600I have to say they have the right to appeal but have no grounds for a change of result..best horse won, accidental bump..the 2nd never looked like catching the winner after the last ..if the difference had been a neck a nose..maybe they would have mehttps://community.betfair.com/irish_sports/go/thread/view/94110/30624829/tingle-creek-appeal-issue?post_id=547065809#547065809I have to say they have the right to appeal but have no grounds for a change of result..best horse won, accidental bump..the 2nd never looked like catching the winner after the last ..if the difference had been a neck a nose..maybe they would have meMon, 07 Dec 2015 11:52:20 -0600A lot of talk on main forum about no precedent of interference while actually over an obstacle, i don't get that as the horses ground was being taken albeit most likely accidental.Another point on the main forum is results are not changed as it meanshttps://community.betfair.com/irish_sports/go/thread/view/94110/30624829/tingle-creek-appeal-issue?post_id=547065025#547065025A lot of talk on main forum about no precedent of interference while actually over an obstacle, i don't get that as the horses ground was being taken albeit most likely accidental.Another point on the main forum is results are not changed as it meansMon, 07 Dec 2015 09:59:45 -0600The calibre of these 'professionals' can't be very high.- Suggesting the jockey might have challenged on the other side is a facile application of second guessing that has no bearing on what actually occurred.-'savvy judges'( might be expected to knohttps://community.betfair.com/irish_sports/go/thread/view/94110/30624829/tingle-creek-appeal-issue?post_id=547064961#547064961The calibre of these 'professionals' can't be very high.- Suggesting the jockey might have challenged on the other side is a facile application of second guessing that has no bearing on what actually occurred.-'savvy judges'( might be expected to knoMon, 07 Dec 2015 09:53:06 -0600