By:
Are my human rights not being infringed?
|
By:
'sly' by name sly by nature. I'm only offered 250p for their superboost. This outfit needs to be culled. It's contravening its license to trade in the UK masquerading as a bookie. I firmly believe it should not be issued with a bookmaking licence.
'Denise' is shaming and caning 'sly' big time. Its CEO is not fit-for-purpose. |
By:
Its CEO is not fit-for-purpose.
That would be the same ceo as betfair, do you think betfair should lose its licence as well? |
By:
probably time to let this go, if you've been betting online for 22 years, you shouldn't have a single unrestricted account.
|
By:
a fookin disgrace !
|
By:
Not been able to use them for ages. No wonder they seem to offer better prices and extra places given who they are offering them to. Sadly, they seem to be offering Unibet tips on how to get rid of customers as well.
|
By:
how can you have a bizness that wont do bizness ...
|
By:
A drug dealer can still push or sell drugs but not for long if the drugs are heavily diluted or whatever the correct term is in that world.
A sh1t outfit buying up another sh1t outfit usually means the final outfit is sh1t too. Otherwise, 'Denise' would have gobbled up 'sly' and other bookies masquerading outfits. |
By:
A sh1t outfit buying up another sh1t outfit usually means the final outfit is sh1t to
So as betfair is one of these outfits, what are you doing here? |
By:
Not for long though. Grey market or retirement beckons if betfair continues this spiral decline.
I'm sick and tired of bookies running horseracing in the UK. I'm looking forward to the day when all gambling adverts are banned esp on mobile and tv. |
By:
Betfair does not even have live pictures from Longchamp. What a ridiculous position for the dominant horseracing Exchange? Any senior marketing individuals ought to be sacked or moved elsewhere. Imagine 'sly' does not provide football pictures despite virtually sponsoring football in the UK.
|
By:
You should object to their licence trusty.
|
By:
Close ure account
|
By:
Would be as well too, nothing will change for the amount you are allowed to win.
|
By:
Minimum bet limits were a saviour for many Australian punters. Faced with a situation where bookmakers simply refused to let them on if they had a successful record, they were suddenly free to bet (to the specified limit, anyway) and bookmakers had to accept.
Minimum bet limits for racing are implemented by racing authorities, and are therefore state-based. In Australia, if bookmakers wish to take bets on racing, they are required to sign agreements with racing authorities. Minimum bet limits have been implemented as part of these agreements. why none here ? GC in bed with bookmakers ?? |
By:
GC expenditure
"preventing gambling from being a source of crime or disorder, being associated with crime or disorder or being used to support crime" 34% of budget "protecting children and other vulnerable persons from being harmed or exploited by gambling." 65.59% of budget "ensuring that gambling is conducted in a fair and open way" .01% of budget |
By:
The Gambling Commission in the UK is toothless and kowtow to bookies. I hope post their last head honcho who resigned abruptly before AC was in force the new head honcho will adopt a similar approach as the Australian Gambling Board ie the bookies here must accept a similar term and condition or leave the betting arena altogether.
Also, ban all forms of advertising on mobile and tv. |
By:
no teeth? imp123 once again showing he is an ignorant clown
A gambling business will pay a £6 million penalty after a Commission investigation revealed social responsibility and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) failings. Gamesys Operations Limited – which operates 12 websites including ballycasino.co.uk, doublebubblebingo.com and jackpotjoy.com – will also have to undergo a third-party audit to ensure it is effectively implementing its anti-money laundering and safer gambling policies, procedures and controls. Done Bros (Cash Betting) Limited, trading as Betfred, will pay £3.25 million after a Commission investigation revealed social responsibility and anti-money laundering failures. Three gambling businesses owned by William Hill Group will pay a total of £19.2 million for social responsibility and anti-money laundering failures. Two online operators 32Red Limited and Platinum Gaming Limited, both part of Kindred Group plc, will pay a £7.1 million penalty for social responsibility and anti-money laundering failures. etc. The problem isn't lack of teeth, it's ngaf about customers being treated in an "open and fair" manner, despite it being a regulatory obligation. |
By:
Sick and tired of bookies running racing
|
By:
introduction of minimum bet rules here would be a tsunami for the scumbags. likes of boils must have 99% of their uk customer base limited to joob joobs. 1% identified as grade A mugs still able to get on more than a fiver.
|
By:
To bookies the bigger the fines from the toothless GC the more kudos for the bookies. A classic example was the repetitive mega fines inflicted on bookies for irresponsible behaviour regarding persistent and colossal losing gambling addicts.
Fines are no deterrent to bookies. It only only affect genuine punters negatively. A ban or a withdrawal of the licence to trade is the only effective deterrent for bookies. |