Stewards Pontefract

cert be be changed or the stewards should resign

winer gave 2nd hefty bmp 100yds out..won inches has to go.

free money if you've the bottle....I could only play these with centralised  pro stewards

but its give 2nd ahefty bump knocking it sideways..won 2"..how can you make a case to stand?

you can't

1.01     £17,500.45
1.02            £26,170.78       
1.03            £30,581.39       
1.04            £10,016.46       
1.05            £4,628.04       
1.06            £13,602.98

crazy..

revised

winner disq

20 mins shud have been 5.

biggest gubbing ive scene for a long time that..

win much ?

250/750

only if the stewards were trainees from Rampton could that one be unchanged

eye conquer..but,they cant be trusted as taking 20 mins shows.

I would argue it should keep the race (as I backed the original winner). From memory they bumped and the haggas horse recovered enough to go into the lead before being nailed by the fav.

It had plenty of time to get over being bumped and recovered enough to go into the lead. On that evidence the bump was inconsequential as the better horse won.

However, had I backed the 2nd I would have argued it had cost it the race, but in all honesty I don't think it did .

It doesn't work like that oneten. If you've been bumped and beaten two inches it's clear you would have won without it.

I've never bought that 'he had time to recover argument', he wouldn't have needed to recover without the foul.

I felt the original winner lost more from the bump and being straightened by jockey than
the second, but the bump cost the second far more than 2 inches and
the winner lugged across causing the bump.

The winner was the best horse, imo, but youve
shirley got to disqualify it for causing the interference
as you can only make allowance for bumped horse and
not the one doing the bumping.