By:
3 parts sister to Courage Mon Ami so , whilst I agree unlikely to be an Epsom Oaks filly, I very much doubt if she will thrive over 10f. Ribblesdale I suspect
|
By:
Rider won’t last a fortnight…..
|
By:
"but simply not good enough", I reckon it was more the jockey than the horse that wasn't good enough
|
By:
He got there in plenty of time to pass a long time clear leader but it wasn`t good enough but I would have preferred if he had had it a lot closer.
That`s how it went 1.12 in running. Because it looked likely to pass them having made up the uncontested big lead the winner got. O`brien horse was a lot further behind Danielle and still beat her. Not good enough and looks a better horse with cut in the ground. |
By:
Its worth remembering that for years shoemark was an average jockey riding for average trainers on average horses. Not sure what he ever did to be propelled to riding for Gosden.
|
By:
Not a Jockey on the planet would have on Danielle Today even Gosden thought it would get beat.
|
By:
winner went too fast on sectionals & still held on
next |
By:
winner wasnt gona be plaiced 1.5f out..
|
By:
Got to love a Nathaniel bred front-runner. Though I suspect Beckett expected Treasure to pick up the pieces.
|
By:
Danielle would do well to be placed in The Ribblesdale. No chance of Epsom Oaks.
|
By:
All the past top men are horsemen…..this fella is a work rider in silks……
|
By:
I think it's extremely unfair to compare Shoemack to Dettori. It's akin to comparing Gosden senior to Gosden junior. Also, the horses at Gosden's now are nowhere as good as when Dettori was stable jockey then. I think the Gosden's stable is in transition.
|
By:
A hybrid clone of Archer/Sir Gordon/Piggott would not have won on Danielle.
Pocket talkers. |
By:
I agree with I123
|
By:
Rnr/Up came from miles back & still beat The jolly.
|
By:
Great ride on the Watson winner at Lingfield for Kieren. Best system ever.
|
By:
17.8 BSP
|