I do not think it will be voided as those prices quoted in running were impossible to match (eg, 10.0 Maximus with 8.2 to lay at same time)
The question has to be raised, who's account or bot was the 10.0 that couldn't be matched
I do not think it will be voided as those prices quoted in running were impossible to match (eg, 10.0 Maximus with 8.2 to lay at same time)The question has to be raised, who's account or bot was the 10.0 that couldn't be matched
ask freddie big boss. he thinks there's nothing to see. probably feels like a pr!ck cos he's been getting told for years there's something not right on here.
wouldn't listen
ask freddie big boss. he thinks there's nothing to see. probably feels like a pr!ck cos he's been getting told for years there's something not right on here. wouldn't listen
as far as i can tell, the in running market was working normally BUT the best back prices were unmatchable, lay prices being smaller than those invisible back prices, cross matcher ????? - more questions than answers here, the software went t!ts up, we need full transparency on what happened here and who's accounts or bots were those fake back prices in running
as far as i can tell, the in running market was working normally BUT the best back prices were unmatchable, lay prices being smaller than those invisible back prices, cross matcher ????? - more questions than answers here, the software went t!ts up,
Thank you for your patience, the trading team have come back stating that they are aware that we had some display issues with the pricing for the Grand National on the Exchange. This is currently being investigated further by the technical team. In the meantime, we apologise for the inconvenience caused. - Timothy 4:44 PM so why has the market been settled? the prices in the back box for the winner were not available? the market shud be voided.
Thank you for your patience, the trading team have come back stating that they are aware that we had some display issues with the pricing for the Grand National on the Exchange. This is currently being investigated further by the technical team. In t
1 new message Apologies for any inconvenience caused by this, the trading and technical team are running an investigation so for the time being we do not have any further information to provide. - Timothy
1 new messageApologies for any inconvenience caused by this, the trading and technical team are running an investigation so for the time being we do not have any further information to provide. - Timothy
trying to figure what we were seeing where the lay price is lower than the back price, on a number of those still running the lay price was incorrect but if you set higher than the back price you could match a price that wasn't in the first box
trying to figure what we were seeing where the lay price is lower than the back price, on a number of those still running the lay price was incorrect but if you set higher than the back price you could match a price that wasn't in the first box
Betfair / PP do not get involved with in play markets and do not have any software to skim markets, it is 100% peer to peer *COUGH*
if you dig around on Youtube you'll see Betfair admitting they outsource their trading (on their own markets) to a third party.
meant to be to seed the markets, do you think that's all they do ??? nah.
Betfair / PP do not get involved with in play markets and do not have any software to skim markets, it is 100% peer to peer *COUGH*if you dig around on Youtube you'll see Betfair admitting they outsource their trading (on their own markets) to a thir
1 new message Apologies for any inconvenience caused by this, the trading and technical team are running an investigation so for the time being we do not have any further information to provide. - Timothy
1 new messageApologies for any inconvenience caused by this, the trading and technical team are running an investigation so for the time being we do not have any further information to provide. - Timothy
Thank you for your patience, the trading team have come back stating that they are aware that we had some display issues with the pricing for the Grand National on the Exchange. This is currently being investigated further by the technical team. In the meantime, we apologise for the inconvenience caused. - Timothy 4:44 PM so why has the market been settled?
simply wrong at every level.
Thank you for your patience, the trading team have come back stating that they are aware that we had some display issues with the pricing for the Grand National on the Exchange. This is currently being investigated further by the technical team. In t
They will ride it out knowing that eventually all the noise will die down and we just accept it. With nothing else really out there, that's the bottom line and they know that.
They will ride it out knowing that eventually all the noise will die down and we just accept it. With nothing else really out there, that's the bottom line and they know that.
They should cancel all in running and reimburse any money that was lost on the National as their site is not fit for purpose. They make millions every day so it would be a drop in the ocean.
They should cancel all in running and reimburse any money that was lost on the National as their site is not fit for purpose. They make millions every day so it would be a drop in the ocean.
yes, , obv api was seeing false numbers, not completely sure if also same on main site, but in effect we're seeing ghost numbers and it's a cache issue, or a cross match issue
yes, , obv api was seeing false numbers, not completely sure if also same on main site, but in effect we're seeing ghost numbers and it's a cache issue, or a cross match issue
the problem only exists on that race, so it's a specific they did, maybe turned something off(?) and it produced a visual issue, with the real prices still there but not in the first pink or blue box
the problem only exists on that race, so it's a specific they did, maybe turned something off(?) and it produced a visual issue, with the real prices still there but not in the first pink or blue box
cheers andriy, which points more towards something like cross matching fakery with the real backs and lays not in the first box on either side (although not all), so eg when mahler mission fell there was a large amount to lay between 27 and 100 and that money was matched even tho it was in the first pink box
cheers andriy, which points more towards something like cross matching fakery with the real backs and lays not in the first box on either side (although not all), so eg when mahler mission fell there was a large amount to lay between 27 and 100 and t
Seen numerous examples recently of the same price to back and lay on football markets. Is usually rectified after a few minutes but makes you wonder if there is is a glitch with their interfaces or something more sinister is afoot.
Seen numerous examples recently of the same price to back and lay on football markets. Is usually rectified after a few minutes but makes you wonder if there is is a glitch with their interfaces or something more sinister is afoot.
its 99.99 certain this ir market will be void, i wanted to back the winner when showing around10 to back and 8 to lay, ( like flukes says this happens often in soccer), so i actually put a back bet on 7 which got matched, i fully expect it to be voided , so to cover myself i backed the winner with daq at 6, only small money,
its 99.99 certain this ir market will be void, i wanted to back the winner when showing around10 to back and 8 to lay, ( like flukes says this happens often in soccer), so i actually put a back bet on 7 which got matched, i fully expect it to be void
There are so many unfair situations on Betfair (the in-house bots, ridiculous reduction factors, late non-runners, in-running time issues to name just a few) I think we just have to accept it (what's the alternative?) and take the rough with the smooth.
There are so many unfair situations on Betfair (the in-house bots, ridiculous reduction factors, late non-runners, in-running time issues to name just a few) I think we just have to accept it (what's the alternative?) and take the rough with the smoo