Jul 6, 2023 -- 9:28AM, Big muff wrote:
Kitts should receive a massive fine and lifetime ban, made no attempt to disguise his intention.
should be banned for failing to cheat properly
Jul 6, 2023 -- 9:32AM, screaming from beneaththewaves wrote:
The owner had horses with the now-banned Johnny Farrelly. Breffniboy was the best.Now we've got to go through the pantomime of working out where in the West Country this firm is going to turn up next.
2 horses ( hillsin and colonlel lesley ) moved to brian barrs yard
Jul 6, 2023 -- 11:32AM, punchestown wrote:
About as bad as it gets as the jockey hadn't got a clue how to do what he was trying to do and ended up making a complete horlicks of it.At least
Jul 7, 2023 -- 1:24PM, CagliariG wrote:
Why bother punchestown,I swerved it because it sums up the IQ of here!!!
My IQ is very low.
But you (Cagliari) are almost of the opinion that the jockey has done nothing wrong and this kind of riding is acceptable.
No doubt the BHA will knee-jerk into action and make an example of this poor lad just because he's not a big fish.
And using the Rachel Blackmore incident, the stewards on the day thought nothing was wrong and didn't do anything. Thats a double standard.
Jul 7, 2023 -- 2:22PM, CagliariG wrote:
Read the script ffs cacique,he carried out the traners instructions to the letter,did he not?How do you or anyone else know the horse would have done better had he used his whip or kicked it in the belly for example?I agree if he deliberately prevented it winning,throw the book at him but as of now there is no evidence is there?Ergo Harchibald in the Champion Hurdle,I say he would have responded,his jockey says he would not.No choice
Jul 7, 2023 -- 2:53PM, CagliariG wrote:
Just hope you lot never find yourselves in a law court,guilty or innocent being judged by 12 of similar idiocy before the evidence is introduced!!
I still can't believe that you think he has done nothing wrong.
Carberry on Harchibald was a totally different, but no less wrong, matter.