Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
17 Sep 21 14:02
Date Joined: 27 Feb 10
| Topic/replies: 5,585 | Blogger: ALIEN SEX FIEND's blog
Backed the winner and understand there is probably a rule 4 if a non runner............however it is only never looked like it would run.
Pause Switch to Standard View SOUTHFIELD LILY...............SURELY...
Show More
Report .Marksman. September 17, 2021 2:06 PM BST
It was bigger than 20/1 so no rule 4.  Betfair SP: 84.4
Report ALIEN SEX FIEND September 17, 2021 2:06 PM BST
Fair enough.
Report .Marksman. September 17, 2021 2:17 PM BST
BHA website reports 3 runners.  So Southfield Lily is non runner
Report sofiakenny September 17, 2021 2:28 PM BST
nope...sporting life..4 ran.
Report Twoboyz September 17, 2021 2:55 PM BST
Looks like a runner to me. Trying to get it to go as tapes went up. Under current rules its a runner
Report Movewiththetimes September 17, 2021 2:56 PM BST
£48 matched at 1000 as tapes went up easy money for somebody
Report SlippyBlue September 17, 2021 2:58 PM BST
That's an absolutely scandalous decision to deem Southfield Lily a runner.
It was never going to be take part in the race, it's a shameful action for those who sanctioned it.
Report .Marksman. September 17, 2021 3:16 PM BST
BHA website have now changed it to 4 runners (after more than an hour).
This is not right.  Who made the decision?  Bookmakers?  BHA should be in charge, not dictated to by other parties.  We need fair play in real life, not just in William Hill adverts.
Report ALIEN SEX FIEND September 17, 2021 7:24 PM BST
Morally it is wrong, the rules need looking at.
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.


Instance ID: 13539