Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
ALIEN SEX FIEND
17 Sep 21 14:02
Joined:
Date Joined: 27 Feb 10
| Topic/replies: 5,534 | Blogger: ALIEN SEX FIEND's blog
Backed the winner and understand there is probably a rule 4 if a non runner............however it is only fair...it never looked like it would run.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 9
By:
.Marksman.
When: 17 Sep 21 14:06
It was bigger than 20/1 so no rule 4.  Betfair SP: 84.4
By:
ALIEN SEX FIEND
When: 17 Sep 21 14:06
Fair enough.
By:
.Marksman.
When: 17 Sep 21 14:17
BHA website reports 3 runners.  So Southfield Lily is non runner
By:
sofiakenny
When: 17 Sep 21 14:28
nope...sporting life..4 ran.
By:
Twoboyz
When: 17 Sep 21 14:55
Looks like a runner to me. Trying to get it to go as tapes went up. Under current rules its a runner
By:
Movewiththetimes
When: 17 Sep 21 14:56
£48 matched at 1000 as tapes went up easy money for somebody
By:
SlippyBlue
When: 17 Sep 21 14:58
That's an absolutely scandalous decision to deem Southfield Lily a runner.
It was never going to be take part in the race, it's a shameful action for those who sanctioned it.
By:
.Marksman.
When: 17 Sep 21 15:16
BHA website have now changed it to 4 runners (after more than an hour).
This is not right.  Who made the decision?  Bookmakers?  BHA should be in charge, not dictated to by other parties.  We need fair play in real life, not just in William Hill adverts.
By:
ALIEN SEX FIEND
When: 17 Sep 21 19:24
Morally it is wrong, the rules need looking at.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com