By:
think winner may lose this
|
By:
keep or no?
|
By:
gotta go.
|
By:
winner has to go imo
2nd past post should be sub 1.5 |
By:
will go
|
By:
Keep
|
By:
Amy thinks it only affected the third
![]() |
By:
should lose it
|
By:
If that doesn't come down there's no point in having rules.
|
By:
tricky one, accidental bump 1 and a half out, would the runner up have won without the bump ? Had loads of time to get past
|
By:
I think it keeps it. The second had ample opportunity to go on and win it if good enough.
|
By:
Demoted.
|
By:
Goes
|
By:
winner barged into 3rd and knocked fav 2-3yds left..beat 6"..has to go.
|
By:
A perfect example of why the pundits shouldn't be related to those with runners, e.g Ryan and Harrington. Ryan's comments are a joke.
|
By:
I backed the 2nd but can't see this being overturned.
|
By:
Think orignal winner big price at 11/8, did it defo 100% cause the interference?
Would other 1 100% went by? I dont know |
By:
Not very biased of her was it, George
![]() Said Kevin stott had whip in wrong hand as well, she had to be corrected, embarrassing |
By:
Backed the winner pre race, layed off to save stake in the photo at 1.39
|
By:
amy has a touch of the arsene wengers she saw nothing
|
By:
Whoever that is on racing UK he's talking some amount of rubbish. Blaming the breeze on not knowing the result, whip in right hand oh no it was the wrong hand etc etc.
|
By:
1.7 to 1.4 now
|
By:
Plunge on Messi..
|
By:
ItsMeSwaddle 17 Aug 21 16:43
Think orignal winner big price at 11/8, did it defo 100% cause the interference? try watching hd on yfdsc. ![]() |
By:
MJK 17 Aug 21 16:44
Whoever that is on racing UK he's talking some amount of rubbish. Blaming the breeze on not knowing the result, whip in right hand oh no it was the wrong hand etc etc. You try being stuck in the potting shed ![]() ![]() ![]() |
By:
Thats why I didnt knar yah SC!!!
|
By:
If that don't go it's a free for all betting on stewards, the question should be what did the winner do right!
|
By:
Whip in wrong hand, barges into 3rd who barges into runner up causing major interference, wins a short head
Can be no other result, amended |
By:
Was there interference yes , did the interference effect the result 50/50 , well the runner up did have over a furlong to go past and he didn't
|
By:
50/50?
|
By:
Agree with carrot, shouldn't be amended and I did back it
|
By:
agreed carrot
|
By:
Whip in WRONG hand, time to do away with these stupid rules, place him 3rd and ban him, the only way they'll ever learn.
|
By:
This one shouldnt actually take long, easy decision. Just throw it out and move on
|
By:
The runner up lost at least 1/2 a length as a result of the interference but finished a head behind
the winner. How has the interference not cost it the race? |
By:
I agree 100% with Carrot.
|
By:
Agree roggrain
|
By:
carrot, so because he didn't make up the 1/2l he lost from being sideswiped in the last 100yds left, the aggressor should go unpunished. Can't have that.
|
By:
![]() |