Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
had it approx 2 months, just really for small soccer accas, and used it for soccer matches premier games only, had quite a bit £5 free bets with them, i did no horse racing bets, no casino, no arbing, im really shocked, NOT RESTRICTED, BUT ACC CLOSED, i have some future events bets on soccer, snooker worlds champs which will stand, but i have no access at all now to remeber what they were> 
. Really was recreational small bets, just to do some accas, and probably put in approx £200 and dont think i had any returns
, and yet closed
. Really was recreational small bets, just to do some accas, and probably put in approx £200 and dont think i had any returns, and yet closed
Show More
IESNARE, have you been winning elsewhere? Betfred has a strict 'Losers only' policy.
You are not enough of a mug, take it as a compliment.
They used to have a tennis pro who used to lose 20k-£30k a week on average, also a foreign-based trainer who used to do the same!
They used to have a tennis pro who used to lose 20k-£30k a week on average, also a foreign-based trainer who used to do the same!
just philf the lot ov em..thou shalt not win..but lose as much as you want..
Is Fred still giving staff loans @ 40% interest???
Tells you all you all you need to know.
Tells you all you all you need to know.
I feel a quiz comin on.
What are the initials of the 2 people you are talking about, Diferent Gravy?
What are the initials of the 2 people you are talking about, Diferent Gravy?
Random guesses:
1. OP mentions free bets so perhaps has fallen foul of the "free bet abuse" algorithm some geek coded up last week
2. It may be OP has accidentally stumbled on the same selections as a known shark
3. Betfred might stupidly be using IP address to link accounts across time, and have made a false link with a shark
1. OP mentions free bets so perhaps has fallen foul of the "free bet abuse" algorithm some geek coded up last week
2. It may be OP has accidentally stumbled on the same selections as a known shark
3. Betfred might stupidly be using IP address to link accounts across time, and have made a false link with a shark
Sorry, no can do!
Been banned twice, next time it's adios.
Been banned twice, next time it's adios.
swiftynifty • February 25, 2021 8:47 PM GMT
IESNARE, have you been winning elsewhere? Betfred has a strict 'Losers only' policy.
Don't think iesnare works anymore as flash has been decommissioned, but no doubt they have some substitute.
IESNARE, have you been winning elsewhere? Betfred has a strict 'Losers only' policy.
Don't think iesnare works anymore as flash has been decommissioned, but no doubt they have some substitute.
They are not BOOKMAKERS 40 Quid ante post bet Beaten LADS fully restricted Account
The whole lot of them need to be closed down if you are beating the Industry SP on Anything
on a regular basis your account will be Kyboshed ..
The whole lot of them need to be closed down if you are beating the Industry SP on Anything
on a regular basis your account will be Kyboshed ..
U sure u aint had another count in the past Elis , because what they have done to you is Beyond it .
Bookmakers have continually abused the hopeless gambling losers yet find with a fine toothcomb the savvy unwanted customers and then we have to listen to Freds token gesture on our TV's with his bet to your pocket and responsible gambling through gritted teeth knowing full well historically they have turned a blind eye to it.
"bet to your pocket" Could quite easily have a pop up comes on when you log on to any site , these individual site Gamb aware adds are just another way of Advertising nothing else ..
Too late for you elisjohn however I've still got bog with fred and also victor.
Keep them sweet by placing some dumb bets which you lay back on here ;ideally try to get into a loss situation with them and then withdraw the reciprocal profits from here.
Keep them sweet by placing some dumb bets which you lay back on here ;ideally try to get into a loss situation with them and then withdraw the reciprocal profits from here.
theres no "Keeping them sweet". if they're keeping your account open it's because they think they can get all of your money from you. they may even get lucky & you turn out to be an addict / problem gambler. that's the jackpot, "traders" running around the office high-fiving each other.
There is one rule to keep accounts open, YOU MUST LOSE.
They DISCRIMATE , i thought that was illegal in this country.
If a firm has 10,000 customers and 9,999 lost. they will ban that ONE WINNER.NAP.
There is only One firm i bet with nowadays. and thats Starsports. they give everyone a decent run, plenty of arbs as well if your a dirty arber.
They have proper traders who know the game inside out and are Proper Bookmakers.
They DISCRIMATE , i thought that was illegal in this country.
If a firm has 10,000 customers and 9,999 lost. they will ban that ONE WINNER.NAP.
There is only One firm i bet with nowadays. and thats Starsports. they give everyone a decent run, plenty of arbs as well if your a dirty arber.
They have proper traders who know the game inside out and are Proper Bookmakers.
they'll still have a look at the list (they definitely don't share with each other as that would be illegal) when you open your account ...
dambuster 26 Feb 21 12:35
There is one rule to keep accounts open, YOU MUST LOSE.
So far from the truth,... and then to big up Starsports
There is one rule to keep accounts open, YOU MUST LOSE.
So far from the truth,... and then to big up Starsports
i've opened an account, placed bets on horses and had an email before the first one has even run telling me to foxtrot oscar. so the notion of "YOU MUST LOSE" is incorrect. if you're taking prices they're not happy with they're not bothered if you lose or not.
Feb 26, 2021 -- 5:48AM, hulk23 wrote:
they'll still have a look at the list (they definitely don't share with each other as that would be illegal) when you open your account ...
They do share information, 1.01
Is that definitely still the case in the GDPR era, Dambuster? No doubting it happened before. Not sure (without fine-tooth combing their T&Cs) they would be allowed to get away with it now.
how could you possibly stop it. two traders meet each other in a park. one leaves a list on the bench & the other one picks it up ...
already heard from someone on here recently who had his account closed before he'd even had a bet. do you think they did that because they didn't like his name ?
If you've had a previous account, are using the same IP address as a "marked" account or the same tablet/desktop/phone you'll be found out.
The fact that you've been closed rather than the usual restriction to lose £5 on bets suggests you've had a previous account?
The fact that you've been closed rather than the usual restriction to lose £5 on bets suggests you've had a previous account?
No it's what Hulk says with the bench thing
In the glass building in Gibraltar they don't even need to find a bench!
When Gib first got going you know exactly the pub chat after work. Difference was in those days they wanted to keep hot accounts alive as they were all following them in.
I have been reading about the TOR Browser which is supposed to give ultra privacy. Anyone any experience of using this and would like to give feedback?
Corals and ladbrokes deffo collude and all Kambi do as well.
I know that for a fact.
I know that for a fact.
GVC own Ladbrokes Coral Sportingbet and various others.
Flutter own Paddy Power Betfair Skybet and others.
Collusion between their own is obvious, but if a new Hills account for example gets restricted it raises suspicions of illegal tracking and data sharing.
Flutter own Paddy Power Betfair Skybet and others.
Collusion between their own is obvious, but if a new Hills account for example gets restricted it raises suspicions of illegal tracking and data sharing.
This week:
William Hill restricted my father to 3p Lucky 15's (his normal stake is 10p)
He loves his RPGTV greyhounds and does the trap challenge on a regular basis - today Coral restricted his stake on that and he is losing to them.
Joke the lot of them!!
William Hill restricted my father to 3p Lucky 15's (his normal stake is 10p)
He loves his RPGTV greyhounds and does the trap challenge on a regular basis - today Coral restricted his stake on that and he is losing to them.
Joke the lot of them!!
^ the above is an example of why they should lose their licence to operate, disgraceful.
They are not BOOKMAKERS Goddess , could not price up a Tin of Beans people take advantage of their ricks and are quickly restricted , as for your grand dad it shows how low these people can go , on RPGTV you get the reps on giving a load of shyte plenty of back slapping from the presenters , send an email in for their thoughts on the Matter , You could bet short odds it will not be read out .
I hope half their shops never open again , feel sorry for the staff but the way most are treated hopefully they could get gainful employment elsewhere ..
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539