There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
I have a feeling that stats will be broken today.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 19
|
By:
If that stats is to remind the same that means only 2 horses can win the race.
|
|
By:
Correct
 |
|
By:
interesting stat
both of mine bigger than 7/1   |
|
By:
Stats ever lie
13/2 winner Was tempted to back all 3 horses 7/1 and under. Back other and put savers on the 7 and unders. came out slight up. |
|
By:
Stat wins
|
|
By:
nice one
 |
|
By:
1st (9) 6 Harzand (IRE) D K Weld 3 9-0 P J Smullen 7/1
2nd (15)1½ 15 Us Army Ranger (IRE) A P O'Brie R L Moore 4/1f 3rd (8) 1¼ 8 Idaho (IRE) A P O'Brien 3 9-0 J A Heffernan 14/1 4th (13) 16 Wings of Desire J H M Gosden L Dettori 6/1 |
|
By:
every horse shortened in the betting
|
|
By:
On-course book percentage: 125.61
|
|
By:
Stat broken
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
Lifter - Stats intact 7/1 winner.
|
|
By:
13 div 2 = 6 1/2
|
|
By:
Harzand the 45th winner ?????? have a guess
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
45th 3rd fav ?
|
|
By:
45th winner with 7 letters in its name
|
|
By:
ok
the only way i see this stat being put to any punting use is that you bet the market principals according to price So i imagine before the off you are already on Wings at 5/1 (16% market share) The Ranger at 6/1 (14% market) Then at the last minute you spring into life when you see Harzand go to 13/2 (13% market) That gives you combined 43% of the market equating to about an 11/10 shot Always considering you were able to get on in time, You werent busy recalculating your liability on Wings and The Ranger That your bookmaker was going to take more than the 50p max on Harzand.. Fair play if youre clued up for this What it actually means is that most punters had they fancied Harzand would surely have availed themselves of the 10/1 and bigger earlier in the day. It would be staggering for someone with a fancy for Harzand to lay off backing it at double figs only to wait til he drops below the magical 7/1, simply on the say so of a stat |