Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
henke
29 Apr 14 17:07
Joined:
Date Joined: 25 Jan 02
| Topic/replies: 834 | Blogger: henke's blog
I see there is a free to air ATR on 7E that is the exact same content as sky ATR but 4 secs in front

how can that be
the excuse  when they slowed it down a few years ago was that it was because of the satellite they were using

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 29
By:
dustybin
When: 29 Apr 14 17:08
Its a scandal imo
By:
tips
When: 29 Apr 14 17:10
whats 7E?
By:
dustybin
When: 29 Apr 14 17:10
so they CAN do it henke?
Ill bet they let slip putting it up unencryped
By:
henke
When: 29 Apr 14 17:14
Eutelsat 7A (7.0°E)   

Frequency: 11192 - Pol: V - SR: 3255 -
By:
bilbobaggins
When: 29 Apr 14 17:17
That is disgusting - I wish somebody in the racing media would kick up a stink about this.
By:
tips
When: 29 Apr 14 17:18
what a pity they cant do this on atr make life so much easier Shocked
By:
dustybin
When: 29 Apr 14 17:19
so its got the ATR graphics on it......thats odd
By:
henke
When: 29 Apr 14 17:19
they can Devil
By:
starfish and coffee
When: 29 Apr 14 17:23
Not only can they show it they have DELIBERATELY went out of their way to slow it down then
By:
kd109
When: 29 Apr 14 17:26
Can you tune this in on a sky box?
By:
tips
When: 29 Apr 14 17:27
?
By:
TRD.Racing
When: 29 Apr 14 17:29
Everyone knows that ATR have slowed the pics down on purpose. Like I have said for years they are a disgrace and pure filth
By:
henke
When: 29 Apr 14 17:30
no
you would need a dish pointed at 7E or motorised to move to 7E

sky dish is fixed pointed at 28.2E
By:
tips
When: 29 Apr 14 17:35
Sad
By:
dustybin
When: 29 Apr 14 17:37
All That's Rancid
By:
thirty-three
When: 29 Apr 14 22:44
And your sky box can't be set to the symbol rate ( 3255 ).
By:
Kriskin
When: 29 Apr 14 23:04
They're a rancid organisation.  The sooner they lose the rights to most tracks the better.
By:
salmon spray
When: 29 Apr 14 23:05
Why have ATR slowed the pics down ?
By:
racingstar
When: 29 Apr 14 23:38
The ATR Pics are no slower today than normal.
They are 7.0 seconds behind "Live".
By:
salmon spray
When: 29 Apr 14 23:46
I meant why would they in the first place.
They live on advertising and if people call them rancid then advertisers would be put off surely     Confused
By:
dustybin
When: 30 Apr 14 02:54
Because they are a bookie channel
Remember ATR wouldn't even acknowledge exchanges for years, was it around 2006 where they changed tact and started mentioning them?
IR isn't associated with bookies but with exchanges so why would bookies want you having opaquely disguised subscription pics to use IR?
It certainly ain't the tech since that proves it was their end product on 7e.
Without anybody getting the truth from them all that can be devised is that they dish up delays as standard to the British customer.....and their sponsors sell loans at ridiculous rates following the last race that you just lost it on.
By:
dustybin
When: 30 Apr 14 02:56
But that's enterprise innit so it's all ok
By:
Black_and_Tans1920-1922
When: 30 Apr 14 07:10
Matt Williams is on the case.He's waiting for a meeting to finish.Then we will have the full story why ATR slowed up.
By:
racingstar
When: 30 Apr 14 12:34
For the benefit of the utterly stupid,the ATR Delay is entirely by their design.
When I had SIS the gap between them and ATR was 1.7 seconds.
In 2011 the gap increased to 2.2 seconds.
The latest increase in "Delay" increased it to 4.2 seconds and has been in place for some time.
Compare ATR (7.0 seconds behind live) with RUK who have reduced their delay to being 1.0 second behind live.
Amazingly,you still get cretins on here bleating about the monthly fee for RUK.
By:
dustybin
When: 30 Apr 14 13:26
The irony was that there was an ruk feed as well as ATR
They were both the same speed

The question here is, should ATR/sis be allowed to farm rights to nearly half of British racing, when they are an amalgamation of bookies that profit from keeping the poor losing, selling on sponsors odious loans and advertise both their product as free (when it's part of a subscription package) and their pictures as 'live' when they clearly start out as that then become 'recorded'?
Since we are talking about a vehicle associated with betting, that's is idiots in my book.

Compare to ruk who ostensibly are a tv channel that covers racing, they supply more to the tracks and have a vesting interest not in bookies winning but in their clients (the customer) being able to pay a subscription.

No wonga adverts on RUK
By:
dustybin
When: 30 Apr 14 13:27
*insidious not idiots
By:
troy71
When: 30 Apr 14 13:40
hi ,,can anyone help,, was wondering when ascot moves to ruk from atr?, ...and atr is murder, never bet on atr races!! in running, pure conn!!!
By:
racingstar
When: 30 Apr 14 15:46
Royal Ascot,Troy.
By:
TRD.Racing
When: 30 Apr 14 16:00
The fact that the delay on ATR is just swept under the carpet is a total disgrace.

This delay is there on purpose. They should not be allowed to promote our sport with their rancid channel
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com