Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
adge
15 Jul 12 10:11
Joined:
Date Joined: 14 Aug 02
| Topic/replies: 7,464 | Blogger: adge's blog
yesterday at york i was in a line of seven bookmakers. i was the only one out of al of them betting 1/4 odds in the handicaps.
in the sixth race a horse refused to go down to the start which reduced the field to 11 reducing the each way terms to 1/5th

i then had to suffer continual abuse from the public for not paying the amount on the ticket. they firmly believed i was cheating them as there was no rule 4 deduction.
one girl brought her boyftiend and all his drunken mates to add their abuse. they kept shouting that nobody else was making a deduction [ where they had bet ] and i was plainly cheating the punters and telling everyone in earshot not to bet with me.

sometimes i despair

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 56
By:
adge
When: 15 Jul 12 10:13
today i'm at southwell betting 1/4 , knowing most others will be 1/5th , but is it really worth it.
By:
PBT
When: 15 Jul 12 10:14
Are you Wilson in disguise?
By:
pauli
When: 15 Jul 12 10:18
The situation you describe doesn't surprise me adge.  It is amazing just how many people bet without understanding the rules.  Unfortunately, there too many people who can only express their frustration by resorting to abuse.  A sad reflection on society as a whole I feel.
By:
helphelp
When: 15 Jul 12 10:21
me too adge  it  would  help  if  the  announcer on  course  would  get  there  fingers  out and  tell  the  public  these  things  also  the  rule  four  deductions straight  away  after  the  race  result  NOT 10  mins  later !!!!!
By:
Sportsadvisor
When: 15 Jul 12 10:30
nobody is getting cheated. this bookie is telling you he was one of a few betting to a 1/4 odds - when  many of his peers were offering the far more restrictive 1/5. in business, this percentage imporvement is a huge concession - to the punter. it's not all very well to hurl abuse when someone is doing his best to give the very best terms
it should be mandated by tracks that all bookies respect the tattersalls standard terms - to their betterment and to the clarity of situation for punters. currently a punter doesnt know if his 5er each way is better of bet at 8/1 or 15/2 (to a sixth!)
unfortunately there is a body of book makers resisting tracks being involved. this, in my view, is a ridiculous and perverted way of looking at things
bottom line is-no track wants to put bookies out of business, its counter productive
we cannot agree amongst ourselves. i am throughly in favour of special conditions being brought in to force us to bet sensibly
By:
Sportsadvisor
When: 15 Jul 12 10:39
thats the accepted standard as laid down by the committee of tattersalls, a body of bookmakers and laymen setup to ensure a fair betting deal
show a little brains, your criticism is totally without foundation, he is forced to return stakes on the withdrawn horse which upsets the margin significantly
By:
SHADDER
When: 15 Jul 12 10:47
Standard terms as laid down by the commitee of tattersalls, a body of bookmakers and laymen set up to ensure a fair betting deal?
Try finding a off course bookmaker that will lay you a "fair " bet in a bad each way race.
The trouble is these terms are outdated and need modernised , oh and what about rule 4 mmm dont even go there
By:
adge
When: 15 Jul 12 10:49
some comments deleted from this thread for some reason. ??
not at my request. sorry if they were yours. we need every ignoramous to post so that we can correct their post with common sanse replies
anyway , off to southwell
By:
adge
When: 15 Jul 12 10:50
SHADDER ,
that is high on my agenda , but 2012 racecourse contracts take precedance
By:
Pilsudski
When: 15 Jul 12 10:58
This is not meant as a criticism Adge,but bookmakers/backers alike know the risk on e.w. when the number of runners is "on the edge".If I were a backer(and I'm not)I would never bet e.w. in a field of ,say 8 runners,for fear of a NR.Can only suggest you pay up,swallow and move on.Life will be more peaceful.
By:
whodareswins
When: 15 Jul 12 11:01
Don't see any reason to criticise a bookmaker who is offering greater value in more races.  But nor do I see any reason to criticise a punter who justly feels aggrieved at what s/he sees as sharp practice.
I very rarely bet each way as I don't see the point of backing a horse twice in the same race.  But I can understand adge's frustration and disquiet at the antics of some racegoers, but he ought to know that whatever the rules of tattersalls are is fairly irrelevant to many racegoers if they do not know them before they bet.  And that rule is fairly obscure and not known by many, and possibly most, racegoers. 
Maybe adge can have his rules printed in large enough print for everyone to be able to see them from a reasonable distance, and displayed ( protected from the weather ) alongside his prices or at least somewhere in full view so that if the situation arises again ( which is very likely ) he can point to them and refer the punter to the racecourse officials.  Or maybe on the back of his ticket he gives to the punter the rules covering his each way bets.  Whatever it can not be beyond the wit of man to come up with a simple solution to the problem which will be accepted by all reasonable persons.
By:
THETRUTHHURTS
When: 15 Jul 12 11:39
NO GOOD DEED GOES UNPUNISHED IN THE BOOKMAKING WORLDSad
By:
the rabbit
When: 15 Jul 12 14:52
i dont always agree with u adge but u are spot on about today.i was in the upper bay and was betting a quarter and got the same abuse .the thing that annoyed me yesterday and always does is the pitch renting .with that and duplicate names .god help us .the rentings a joke .and the renters round me were all betting inferior place terms on all races
By:
Davy Jones
When: 15 Jul 12 16:58
Adge - The problem of changing place terms due to non runners is an issue regardless of what the rest of the line do. I remember an 8 horse race reducing by 1 to a 7 horse race. As you can guess ew bets on the 3rd struck prior to the non runner all came in to collect, some took it ok, one guy genuinely thought that I had tried to shaft him.

Just on of those things!
By:
kingG111111
When: 15 Jul 12 16:59
how did my posts dissapear ?
By:
allpoints
When: 15 Jul 12 17:02
Just shows the difference in the rings.I bet exactly like adge yesterday but in Tatts.When i explained to people what had happened to the place bet(not getting what was shown on the ticket)I did not have a single complaint.However at Ascot when that rule 4 came in(which took ages to announce)I was in the Silver ring & got plenty of abuse.
By:
courselayer
When: 15 Jul 12 18:58
On the first race adge I walked the line of books and about 25 of the 50 on the course were betting to 1/5th.
It makes it difficult to bet to 1/4th when next door can top you because of the place margins in his book, and I wondered why I bother.
Wilson is blamed for this abuse but like I say 50% of the great and the good from pick 1 to 50 were all at it.

As I have said before I vote to scrap each way terms and lets have a price to win and a price to be placed.

Another issue yesterday was the 10% rule 4 deduction when a horse trading at around 6/1 (16%) was withdrawn, and another
race when 8% dissapeared from my book without trace (2 withdrawn).
Any hope of getting the reduction factors reviewed?
By:
unbiased
When: 15 Jul 12 19:15
Adge,I would imagine they had already made up their minds that you were "doing them",and would therefore not listen to a word you said.One way conversation ?
A while back a punter asked if I could help him,as he thought his payout was wrong.As he was only interested in his own interpretations of the event,I could see that it would be a waste of time trying to explain the rules of racing,add to that the lager had probably kicked in.
He asked me ,apparently,because I happened to be reading the Racing Post,and thought I would have a bit of knowledge!
By:
1st time poster
When: 15 Jul 12 19:28
but losing bets by lagered up punters are always welcome obviously,no obligation of course adge but between you and me what would it have cost for the goodwill of pointing out the reduction ,but paying out the ticket winnings
By:
comingupthehill
When: 15 Jul 12 19:40
1st - fair point ,the drunks are easy pickings - the downside is they get angry when they dont understand - cant pocket a load of winnings of them ,then gripe about the awkward ones,comes with the territory,

thats why they have bouncers on nightclubs
By:
REGIT
When: 15 Jul 12 20:07
same as allpoints but i actually explained to the whole line why it would be less.same with the rule 4.stood and told them all and said if anyone didnt understand i would explain one to one.dont know if it was cos of that or the fact we have a female(wife)on front but never have any trouble.(touch wood).one thing we never do is just give them the lesser ammount without explaining why.even if they dont kick off they wont come back.
By:
1st time poster
When: 15 Jul 12 20:12
wish pp would give me a one to one, on my torres golden boot returns, LaughLaughLaugh
try explaining that one to a queue of pished up punters, CryCry
By:
REGIT
When: 15 Jul 12 20:32
adge bet proper ew all day(gold flag)admit to 1/5 1234 on the big race(but wouldnt have joined if that wasnt part of it).won £637.35 place.at ascot we all bet sensible on black caviars race.with the figures i bet 1/5 123.the book next to me said they dont know the difference and bet 1/6.he held under £200 place.i held £850.THOSE THAT MATTER KNOW THE DIFFERENCE-PUNTERS.those that dont bet proper ew are shooting themselves in the foot.LaughLaughLaughLaugh
By:
cantspell
When: 15 Jul 12 20:33
surely if bookmakers alter the  terms to a 1/5 123 when tatts are 1/4 then thats what they should pay not then revert  to how tatts rules change the places since there not betting to those terms b interesting when challenged
By:
REGIT
When: 15 Jul 12 20:38
youve got it the wrong way round cantspell.those betting 1/4 123(proper ew terms)pay 1/5 123 when a 12 runner race becomes 11.so the return is less than it says on the ticket.those just betting 1/5 stay the same.mind you when an 8 runner race becomes 7 and the places change from 1/5 123 to 1/4 12 the number of books who just pay the 1/5th on the ticket and 2 places is disgraceful.but i honestly believe that honesty long term pays off.
By:
cantspell
When: 15 Jul 12 20:45
but regit if i back a horse each way with a bookmaker who is doing his own terms and my horse finishes 3rd how can he then change his terms to b only the first 2 since he is not betting to tatts terms
By:
cantspell
When: 15 Jul 12 20:47
this is wen a race goes fro 8 to 7
By:
cantspell
When: 15 Jul 12 20:47
this is wen a race goes fro 8 to 7
By:
fibber2
When: 15 Jul 12 20:49
Being allowed to change your place terms on bets already struck, does not make sense in my eyes (unless they're struck at SP)  When there's a non runner, the Rule 4 is there to protect us (or at least its supposed to, and I know in this case it didn't!), being able to reduce the place terms as well seemed unfair to me. 

We discussed this at length when developing our on course software, and decided to put in an option to allow the bookmaker to choose whether to apply the new place terms or not.

cantspell - Someone who bets to non-standard terms are not allowed to change the terms on bets already struck, as far as I understand.
By:
THETRUTHHURTS
When: 15 Jul 12 20:50
PERSONALLY I WOULD PAY EM A 1/4 IN THE ABOVE INSTANCE(AINT WORTH THE MITHER FOR WHATS INVOLVED,MIND U THE COMMISSION AGENTS CANT DO THAT CAN THEY REGITLaughLaughWinkLove
By:
bar one
When: 15 Jul 12 20:55
when a race goes from eight runners to seven runners, all will pay 1/4 odds 1-2, some bookmakers advertise on their board or at their bottom of their LED board each way 1/4 odds 4-7 runners just in case the said circumstance happens
By:
REGIT
When: 15 Jul 12 20:57
if a bookmaker is betting 1/6 123 and they take a horse out unless he has a sign(a lot do)stating that his terms alter dependant on runners i think he should pay first three but in reality he will pay ferst 2 and probably at 1/6 odds.
By:
fibber2
When: 15 Jul 12 20:58
that rings a bell bar1, you're probably allowed to change the terms as long as you are displaying that clearly enough
By:
cantspell
When: 15 Jul 12 20:59
but bar one they are standard terms if a bookmakers alters his terms to non standard terms hence a 1/6 th 123 can he then allowed to pay only the first 2 wen the field is reduced to 7 from 8
By:
REGIT
When: 15 Jul 12 21:00
WHEN YOUVE TAKEN A LOT OF BETS ON THE RACE IT MAKES A BIG DIFFRENCE BUT YOU DONT HAVE ANY PICHES WHERE YOU TAKE A LOT OF BETS DO YOU TRUTHLaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaugh
By:
THETRUTHHURTS
When: 15 Jul 12 21:05
REGIT,I GUARANTEE I TOOK MORE ON SATURDAY IN MY CHEAPEST PITCH(NOT A PENNY BACK ON ANY EXCHANGE)THAN U WOULD IN YOURS OR ANY RENTED PITCH U STAND INLoveLoveLoveLoveLove
By:
intheknow
When: 15 Jul 12 21:05
The Truth is the king of high slippage. Unfortunately most of them are voids Grin
By:
THETRUTHHURTS
When: 15 Jul 12 21:06
MIND U 30 BETS IS A LOT FOR ULaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaugh
By:
THETRUTHHURTS
When: 15 Jul 12 21:08
I THINK REGIT STILL HOLDS THE GREAT BRITAIN AND ALL COMERS RECORD AT HEXHAM(LESS THAN 100 SLIPS ON A MEET)AND IT WASNT EVEN HIS PITCHLaughLaughLaughLaughLaugh
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com