Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
every time i get refused bets i record the footage on my phone , its funny viewing i am planning on putting them on the net , its about time the punters started the fight back who is in? them dirty bookmakers have got away with it for to long...
Show More
i closed the u tube acount because it had my full name plastered all over it dont really want my name plastered all over the net..
Sorry Grim, but I'm pretty sure the staff in his videos didn't want to be plastered all over the Internet, but he didn't give them that choice, did he.
If someone is stupid enough to link their name to their account whilst trying act billy big bollocks then they're fair game in my book.
Sorry Grim, but I'm pretty sure the staff in his videos didn't want to be plastered all over the Internet, but he didn't give them that choice, did he.
If someone is stupid enough to link their name to their account whilst trying act billy big bollocks then they're fair game in my book.
Once bookmakers realised that they could get away with only allowing proven long term losers to bet with them on account.They are now quickly extending this policy into the shops.Until recently they were increasingly restricting the tiny % of punters who got ahead or even took best price but now its becoming increasingly like account betting.....losers only.
tonto stating the blindingly obvious yet again.
Where would we be without his insightful comments?
Where would we be without his insightful comments?
Is that the blindingly obvious that you were denying until recently diva banks.
If it is so blindingly obvious why does not one racing media outlet state it or even discuss it.
Your insight only seems to stretch as far as bookmakers right punters wrong....
If it is so blindingly obvious why does not one racing media outlet state it or even discuss it.
Your insight only seems to stretch as far as bookmakers right punters wrong....
Doesn't make it right though does it Bon Viveur.......
Is that the blindingly obvious that you were denying until recently diva banks.
Don't think I have ever said that. You are clearly not the brightest spark and feel that lies are the way forward. Somewhat unbecoming however it is a fact of life that now and then you come across persons whose integrity is questionable.
tonto your knowledge on all things betting is so limited that I am not going to discuss things with you.
Don't think I have ever said that. You are clearly not the brightest spark and feel that lies are the way forward. Somewhat unbecoming however it is a fact of life that now and then you come across persons whose integrity is questionable.
tonto your knowledge on all things betting is so limited that I am not going to discuss things with you.
Doesn't make it right though does it Bon Viveur.......
A commercial business maximising it's profits? Not sure I have a problem with that. They are not a public body providing a service.
I just find ways round it as I'm sure do plenty of others.
A commercial business maximising it's profits? Not sure I have a problem with that. They are not a public body providing a service.
I just find ways round it as I'm sure do plenty of others.
Banned_Banks
15 Jul 12 12:38 Joined: 29 Apr 12 | Topic/replies: 300 | Blogger: Banned_Banks's blog
A commercial business maximising it's profits? Not sure I have a problem with that. They are not a public body providing a service.
just the kind of enlightened thinking that has served us all so well recently.
15 Jul 12 12:38 Joined: 29 Apr 12 | Topic/replies: 300 | Blogger: Banned_Banks's blog
A commercial business maximising it's profits? Not sure I have a problem with that. They are not a public body providing a service.
just the kind of enlightened thinking that has served us all so well recently.
The discussion has been had ad infinitum. I was merely responding to an inane post from my dear friend tonto.
Bon Viveur in all your re-incarnations this one takes the biscuit...
"I just find ways round it as I'm sure do plenty of others"
You are now claiming to be a successful punter !!
You never cease to amaze...
Banks - Famous Bon Viveur and Pro Gambler defending the very "Bookmakers" who refuse his bets...
You couldn't make it up or could you....
Was the username Mr Roarke taken when you opened your Betfair account ?
"I just find ways round it as I'm sure do plenty of others"
You are now claiming to be a successful punter !!
You never cease to amaze...
Banks - Famous Bon Viveur and Pro Gambler defending the very "Bookmakers" who refuse his bets...
You couldn't make it up or could you....
Was the username Mr Roarke taken when you opened your Betfair account ?
Its good to see you stamping your feet and throwing your little hissy fits every time you are exposed for the bookmakers mouthpiece you are banks.You really are the forums very own diva.To be accused of lying by someone who claims he is an international superstar really is amusing.Also to have my integrity questioned by someone who constantly defends the way bookmakers are dragging tens of thousands of people(and their families) into poverty and addiction,i can only take as a compliment.I am very happy with my morals and integrity banks.If you are happy with your constant defense of the rich and powerful feeding off and exploiting the poor and vulnerable then you have no conscience or decency.
Yes you did previously deny bookmakers stop winning clients, until the evidence became overwhelming from the hundreds of posts on here.Whatever is the standard issue bookmaker propaganda has always been your line banks.
Yes you did previously deny bookmakers stop winning clients, until the evidence became overwhelming from the hundreds of posts on here.Whatever is the standard issue bookmaker propaganda has always been your line banks.
Its good to see you stamping your feet and throwing your little hissy fits every time you are exposed for the bookmakers mouthpiece you are banks.
I don't work for a bookmaker. I don't earn money from their success. I have no shares in bookmakers. I have a career you could only dream of in another unrelated sector.
To be accused of lying by someone who claims he is an international superstar really is amusing.
Not sure where I've ever said that. I travel a lot however not sure how you have come to the conclusion that that eqautes to being an "international superstar".
Also to have my integrity questioned by someone who constantly defends the way bookmakers are dragging tens of thousands of people(and their families) into poverty and addiction,i can only take as a compliment.
Childish comment.
I am very happy with my morals and integrity banks.If you are happy with your constant defense of the rich and powerful feeding off and exploiting the poor and vulnerable then you have no conscience or decency.
A million miles away from the truth. I am a massive net contributor to society however I don't think that requires me to have to prove it to dullards like you.
Yes you did previously deny bookmakers stop winning clients, until the evidence became overwhelming from the hundreds of posts on here.Whatever is the standard issue bookmaker propaganda has always been your line banks.
That is just an outright lie and fits neatly in with your modus operandi. I have often explained that I don't think it is wrong for bookmakers to refuse bets however I have never denied that winning customers are stopped. That is another figment of your imagination made up to fit in with your argument.
I'm afraid you are disingenuous in the extreme primarily because you are simply not bright enough to have a cogent discussion.
I don't work for a bookmaker. I don't earn money from their success. I have no shares in bookmakers. I have a career you could only dream of in another unrelated sector.
To be accused of lying by someone who claims he is an international superstar really is amusing.
Not sure where I've ever said that. I travel a lot however not sure how you have come to the conclusion that that eqautes to being an "international superstar".
Also to have my integrity questioned by someone who constantly defends the way bookmakers are dragging tens of thousands of people(and their families) into poverty and addiction,i can only take as a compliment.
Childish comment.
I am very happy with my morals and integrity banks.If you are happy with your constant defense of the rich and powerful feeding off and exploiting the poor and vulnerable then you have no conscience or decency.
A million miles away from the truth. I am a massive net contributor to society however I don't think that requires me to have to prove it to dullards like you.
Yes you did previously deny bookmakers stop winning clients, until the evidence became overwhelming from the hundreds of posts on here.Whatever is the standard issue bookmaker propaganda has always been your line banks.
That is just an outright lie and fits neatly in with your modus operandi. I have often explained that I don't think it is wrong for bookmakers to refuse bets however I have never denied that winning customers are stopped. That is another figment of your imagination made up to fit in with your argument.
I'm afraid you are disingenuous in the extreme primarily because you are simply not bright enough to have a cogent discussion.
Very little is known about the man known as Mr. Roarke and it isn't clear if that's his first, last, or only name. Although most guests know him as "Mr." Roarke, many people close to him, including past lovers, have referred to him only as "Roarke", which suggests he may not have any other names. He is the sole owner and proprietor of Fantasy Island.
No idea what you are on about homefortea however it all sounds very interesting however I have never heard of Fantasy Island so your analogy is probably a bit lost on me.
Thought that it might have featured in your era Banks !!!
Famous Bon Viveur and pro gambler.....
Perhaps I should have compared you to a younger Sean Connery !!
Famous Bon Viveur and pro gambler.....
Perhaps I should have compared you to a younger Sean Connery !!
banks - most of your posts are in favour of the bookmakers .
2 questions for you
1) why bother sticking up for them , even if what you say is correct , surely you have better things to do ?
2) how comes you are not so enthusiastic on any other subjects ? i can't remember reading posts from you on any other subjects on the forum , whether it be who will win a race, why the stewards ammended a result , etc .
2 questions for you
1) why bother sticking up for them , even if what you say is correct , surely you have better things to do ?
2) how comes you are not so enthusiastic on any other subjects ? i can't remember reading posts from you on any other subjects on the forum , whether it be who will win a race, why the stewards ammended a result , etc .
Banks out now unlike some i am not glued to this forum(how do you find the time away from the hurly burly of being aN international mega star[:happy:)in your case looking for any reference to bookmakers.So you can jump in to take their side against punters.I hope you get double bubble Sundays.When i get in i will waste some time looking over your previous posts to confirm my recollection of your posts backing the old disproven bookmakers argument,that it is only arbers bookmakers refuse bets from.
this arbing lark is just something for them to hide behind. i have only ever layed 3 horses in my life out of 20 years betting and i cant get a bet on.
simply a case of 15 years of losing and no problems and yet a few years of winning and now impossible to have a bet, let alone a decent size one.
i can see their point of view re a business, why take a risk with people who might win when there are so many mugs out their who will happily put 1000's into machines or virtual racing/bingo etc etc.
simply a case of 15 years of losing and no problems and yet a few years of winning and now impossible to have a bet, let alone a decent size one.
i can see their point of view re a business, why take a risk with people who might win when there are so many mugs out their who will happily put 1000's into machines or virtual racing/bingo etc etc.
julie covington did a song once..only women bleed.....the same can be said for betting shop punters....they are the thickest of the thick and bleed money straight into the pockets of the bookies...there is and never will be a betting shop punter who makes good money...so you can forget all about the fairy stories from the so called pro's who made money from the betting shops, it never happened and never will.
Had a few probs with Corals a couple of years ago, both in the shop & phone acc.
Phone acc got closed & was not allowed an early price in my local shop & could only have £50 at sp!! A joke outfit in my book (Corals)
Lately its been probs with Hills (phone acc) making it very difficult for me to get on at the early prices for the last few months. Had it out with them again 2day on the phone about early prices & being limited to what i can get on with them (if anything at all)
Had probs yest morn again with them (Hills) about the price of Bonnie Brae (10s) in yest Burnbury Cup at Newmarket. Nobody was given that price, which was bang out of order, as that was supposed to be there price in the morn, only offering 7s
I told them that they were guilty of false price PR spin, which safe to say did not go down well, then put it to them that they were only interested in the every day (mug punters and that anybody that makes a profit of them were getting messed about.
No doubt i will be getting a letter from them soon, informing me that my account with them has been closed.
Phone acc got closed & was not allowed an early price in my local shop & could only have £50 at sp!! A joke outfit in my book (Corals)
Lately its been probs with Hills (phone acc) making it very difficult for me to get on at the early prices for the last few months. Had it out with them again 2day on the phone about early prices & being limited to what i can get on with them (if anything at all)
Had probs yest morn again with them (Hills) about the price of Bonnie Brae (10s) in yest Burnbury Cup at Newmarket. Nobody was given that price, which was bang out of order, as that was supposed to be there price in the morn, only offering 7s
I told them that they were guilty of false price PR spin, which safe to say did not go down well, then put it to them that they were only interested in the every day (mug punters and that anybody that makes a profit of them were getting messed about.
No doubt i will be getting a letter from them soon, informing me that my account with them has been closed.
No other business would be allowed to get away with just conning the stupid and refusing to do business with those who look for a fair value transaction.Its like the banks only accepting investments from those stupid enough to accept rip off charges.An uncorrupted financial media would soon put a stop to it but they get away with it because they have bought the cooperation and silence of the racing media.
As i have said before,if bookmakers want to only bet with proven losers lets have it out in the open.Most of the new generation of punters would laugh at them and go straight to the exchanges or just not bet.
As i have said before,if bookmakers want to only bet with proven losers lets have it out in the open.Most of the new generation of punters would laugh at them and go straight to the exchanges or just not bet.
When i get in i will waste some time looking over your previous posts to confirm my recollection of your posts backing the old disproven bookmakers argument,that it is only arbers bookmakers refuse bets from.
Pretty sure I have never mentioned arbers ever. Others have argued this not me.
Pretty sure I have never mentioned arbers ever. Others have argued this not me.
I am not a new generation punter but went straight to the exchanges. Best of luck with your bookmakers.
how comes you are not so enthusiastic on any other subjects ? i can't remember reading posts from you on any other subjects on the forum , whether it be who will win a race, why the stewards ammended a result , etc .
I never discuss my punting on here. Prefer to do that with people I know as the source is the most important part of any info.
I never discuss my punting on here. Prefer to do that with people I know as the source is the most important part of any info.
i must admit i thought banks was one of a few bookie's trolls on here but I am now coming round to thinking he is just another forum nutcase.
not just any old nutcase though.....an international superstar nutcase
actually nutcase was uncalled for and i apologise. fantasist would be more accurate.
banks - most of your posts are in favour of the bookmakers .
2 questions for you
1) why bother sticking up for them , even if what you say is correct , surely you have better things to do ?
2) how comes you are not so enthusiastic on any other subjects ? i can't remember reading posts from you on any other subjects on the forum , whether it be who will win a race, why the stewards ammended a result , etc .
keep the information to yourself . but why waste time only posting in threads about bookmakers ?
by the way, your last response to my 2 questions made you sound like you were 14 years old
2 questions for you
1) why bother sticking up for them , even if what you say is correct , surely you have better things to do ?
2) how comes you are not so enthusiastic on any other subjects ? i can't remember reading posts from you on any other subjects on the forum , whether it be who will win a race, why the stewards ammended a result , etc .
keep the information to yourself . but why waste time only posting in threads about bookmakers ?
by the way, your last response to my 2 questions made you sound like you were 14 years old
I never discuss my punting on here. Prefer to do that with people I know as the source is the most important part of any info.
That makes me sound 14? Curious conclusion.
Mind you homefortea is suggesting I lived through the early Sean Connery era so I don't know which I prefer!
That makes me sound 14? Curious conclusion.
Mind you homefortea is suggesting I lived through the early Sean Connery era so I don't know which I prefer!
do you think people will follow your "information" and ruin the price ?
i doubt it, unless you are a national tipster.
get real banned banks
so why do you waste time posting only on threads that bad mouth bookmakers ?
i doubt it, unless you are a national tipster.
get real banned banks
so why do you waste time posting only on threads that bad mouth bookmakers ?
do you think people will follow your "information" and ruin the price ?
i doubt it, unless you are a national tipster.
get real banned banks
Sorry I think you missed my point here. What I was saying is that I don't see the point exchanging info with faceless people as I have no idea of their motives whereas with people I know I can decide how to weight what they say based on who they are.
I wasn't talking about me offering info in fact quite the reverse.
i doubt it, unless you are a national tipster.
get real banned banks
Sorry I think you missed my point here. What I was saying is that I don't see the point exchanging info with faceless people as I have no idea of their motives whereas with people I know I can decide how to weight what they say based on who they are.
I wasn't talking about me offering info in fact quite the reverse.
i shall re-phrase the questions ( ie ; there are many more discussions on this forum other than who you are backing , so lets leave that out )
banks - most of your posts are in favour of the bookmakers .
2 questions for you
1) why bother sticking up for them , even if what you say is correct , surely you have better things to do ?
2) how comes you are not so enthusiastic on any other subjects ? i can't remember reading posts from you on any other subjects on the forum , whether it be why the stewards ammended a result , did the jockey stop riding etc
banks - most of your posts are in favour of the bookmakers .
2 questions for you
1) why bother sticking up for them , even if what you say is correct , surely you have better things to do ?
2) how comes you are not so enthusiastic on any other subjects ? i can't remember reading posts from you on any other subjects on the forum , whether it be why the stewards ammended a result , did the jockey stop riding etc
I would suspect Banks works in a field where cynical and underhand commercial exploitation of the consumer is also rife, and so feels some kinship with the bookmaking industry.
His determination to defend corporate misrepresentation and commercial discrimination of the very worst kind may well be no more than professional courtesy, imo...
His determination to defend corporate misrepresentation and commercial discrimination of the very worst kind may well be no more than professional courtesy, imo...
wish they had stopped taking bets of me 30 years ago. 
He is the only pro punter who sticks up for the "Bookmakers"...
Banned_Banks
15 Jul 12 12:38 Joined: 29 Apr 12 | Topic/replies: 309 | Blogger: Banned_Banks's blog
Doesn't make it right though does it Bon Viveur.......
A commercial business maximising it's profits? Not sure I have a problem with that. They are not a public body providing a service.
I just find ways round it as I'm sure do plenty of other
He is one hell of a guy !!
Banned_Banks
15 Jul 12 12:38 Joined: 29 Apr 12 | Topic/replies: 309 | Blogger: Banned_Banks's blog
Doesn't make it right though does it Bon Viveur.......
A commercial business maximising it's profits? Not sure I have a problem with that. They are not a public body providing a service.
I just find ways round it as I'm sure do plenty of other
He is one hell of a guy !!
The-Fenman
15 Jul 12 16:56 Joined: 26 Jun 12 | Topic/replies: 1,012 | Blogger: The-Fenman's blog
Without the "he is a arber" card this lot are stark bollox naked.
Ive won £800 quid of Stan James this weekend . . They put the prices up not me.
Today im shut.
Poor form that fenny.If I had an extended run with that rancid outfit I could have the keys to the office safe in three days...
They are not fit to issue prices and they have the cheek to supply others..
And they wonder why all the Independent Bookmakers are going bust !!
15 Jul 12 16:56 Joined: 26 Jun 12 | Topic/replies: 1,012 | Blogger: The-Fenman's blog
Without the "he is a arber" card this lot are stark bollox naked.
Ive won £800 quid of Stan James this weekend . . They put the prices up not me.
Today im shut.
Poor form that fenny.If I had an extended run with that rancid outfit I could have the keys to the office safe in three days...
They are not fit to issue prices and they have the cheek to supply others..
And they wonder why all the Independent Bookmakers are going bust !!
if their was no bookies - there d be no betfair ,and no forum to moan about them on and no racing - they can offer whatever they want,they only have to give you a satisfactory service .most do more than that.
Very incisive comingupthehill...
One day you may reach the top....
One day you may reach the top....
this knob is trying to get a bet on with no money in his account and he's wondering why he's getting rejected
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6mqijxY2cM&feature=relmfu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6mqijxY2cM&feature=relmfu
yep , plenty of us have had the same I would think
well I have and that was about two or three years ago
well I have and that was about two or three years ago
Try Jennings shops fenny some of them get supplied by sid.....
Take the straw hat off and you may go unrecognised !!
Take the straw hat off and you may go unrecognised !!
( a reminder for banned banks )
i shall re-phrase the questions ( ie ; there are many more discussions on this forum other than who you are backing , so lets leave that out )
banks - most of your posts are in favour of the bookmakers .
2 simple questions for you , answer one at a time please
1) why bother sticking up for them , even if what you say is correct , surely you have better things to do ?
2) how comes you are not so enthusiastic on any other subjects ? i can't remember reading posts from you on any other subjects on the forum , whether it be why the stewards ammended a result , did the jockey stop riding etc
i shall re-phrase the questions ( ie ; there are many more discussions on this forum other than who you are backing , so lets leave that out )
banks - most of your posts are in favour of the bookmakers .
2 simple questions for you , answer one at a time please
1) why bother sticking up for them , even if what you say is correct , surely you have better things to do ?
2) how comes you are not so enthusiastic on any other subjects ? i can't remember reading posts from you on any other subjects on the forum , whether it be why the stewards ammended a result , did the jockey stop riding etc
afternoon everyone seems this is getting a very interesting subject
i had a placepot at folkstone a few months back , the chap behind the counter was physicaly shaking when he saw the bet he called up and it was a 15 miniute conversation before they took the bet... the staff have all been brainwashed in to thinking most people are trying to con them....
1) why bother sticking up for them , even if what you say is correct , surely you have better things to do ?
Clearly not.
2) how comes you are not so enthusiastic on any other subjects ? i can't remember reading posts from you on any other subjects on the forum , whether it be why the stewards ammended a result , did the jockey stop riding etc
Probably have less than 5% of my turnover on horse racing.
Clearly not.
2) how comes you are not so enthusiastic on any other subjects ? i can't remember reading posts from you on any other subjects on the forum , whether it be why the stewards ammended a result , did the jockey stop riding etc
Probably have less than 5% of my turnover on horse racing.
when I walk into a shop I feel they are looking at me as if I have got a sawnoff pointing at them
less than 5% turnover on horse racing ?
why bother with all the pro-bookmaker comments re-garding horse racing bets then ?
why bother with all the pro-bookmaker comments re-garding horse racing bets then ?
less than 5% turnover on horse racing ?
why bother with all the pro-bookmaker comments re-garding horse racing bets then ?
Don't think I have ever referred to horse racing bets per se. I talk about restrictions in general. The fact is that most on here talk about horse racing restrictions hence why the discussions go that way.
why bother with all the pro-bookmaker comments re-garding horse racing bets then ?
Don't think I have ever referred to horse racing bets per se. I talk about restrictions in general. The fact is that most on here talk about horse racing restrictions hence why the discussions go that way.
winker watson
16 Jul 12 15:33 Joined: 06 Jul 07 | Topic/replies: 226 | Blogger: winker watson's blog
i had a placepot at folkstone a few months back , the chap behind the counter was physicaly shaking when he saw the bet he called up and it was a 15 miniute conversation before they took the bet... the staff have all been brainwashed in to thinking most people are trying to con them....
why on earth would they need a 15 min conversation about a pool bet that has no liability????
16 Jul 12 15:33 Joined: 06 Jul 07 | Topic/replies: 226 | Blogger: winker watson's blog
i had a placepot at folkstone a few months back , the chap behind the counter was physicaly shaking when he saw the bet he called up and it was a 15 miniute conversation before they took the bet... the staff have all been brainwashed in to thinking most people are trying to con them....
why on earth would they need a 15 min conversation about a pool bet that has no liability????
i would say that you have referred to dirty eachway bets on more than one occasion .
i would say that you have referred to dirty eachway bets on more than one occasion .
They do form part of my 5%. Is that OK with you?
They do form part of my 5%. Is that OK with you?
Don't think I have ever referred to horse racing bets per se
just correcting your statement within this discussion , merely pointing out fact from fiction. is that ok with you ?
just correcting your statement within this discussion , merely pointing out fact from fiction. is that ok with you ?
Not really as you have quoted it out of context.
I suspect you are one of the ever growing breed of new age stalkers who are just a little dim. Bless.
I suspect you are one of the ever growing breed of new age stalkers who are just a little dim. Bless.
northanlite Joined: 07 Jun 04
Replies: 4793 16 Jul 12 16:30
winker watson
16 Jul 12 15:33 Joined: 06 Jul 07 | Topic/replies: 226 | Blogger: winker watson's blog
i had a placepot at folkstone a few months back , the chap behind the counter was physicaly shaking when he saw the bet he called up and it was a 15 miniute conversation before they took the bet... the staff have all been brainwashed in to thinking most people are trying to con them....
why on earth would they need a 15 min conversation about a pool bet that has no liability????
maybe it was a bookies that dont have tote direct?
Replies: 4793 16 Jul 12 16:30
winker watson
16 Jul 12 15:33 Joined: 06 Jul 07 | Topic/replies: 226 | Blogger: winker watson's blog
i had a placepot at folkstone a few months back , the chap behind the counter was physicaly shaking when he saw the bet he called up and it was a 15 miniute conversation before they took the bet... the staff have all been brainwashed in to thinking most people are trying to con them....
why on earth would they need a 15 min conversation about a pool bet that has no liability????
maybe it was a bookies that dont have tote direct?
the impression you gave me of you being 14 years old bears fruit , only little kids would stoop to insults in a discussion .
as for taking it out of context , that is what you do frequently.
i wont degrade myself in exchanging insults with you .
as for taking it out of context , that is what you do frequently.
i wont degrade myself in exchanging insults with you .
as for taking it out of context , that is what you do frequently.
Unsubstantiated nonsense.
i wont degrade myself in exchanging insults with you
Thinly veiled "I wanted to start an argument but am struggling to make any coherent points so I'll look for a quick exit strategy and try and claim the moral high ground and hope nobody notices"
Unsubstantiated nonsense.
i wont degrade myself in exchanging insults with you
Thinly veiled "I wanted to start an argument but am struggling to make any coherent points so I'll look for a quick exit strategy and try and claim the moral high ground and hope nobody notices"
Famous bon viveur pro gambler...
So what is the other 95% of your betting on then ?
Don't tell me that you have cracked the secret code of the FOBTs and amongst your many talents you are "The Master Of Disguise" and flit across the county in your Aston Martin emptying machines at will ?
So what is the other 95% of your betting on then ?
Don't tell me that you have cracked the secret code of the FOBTs and amongst your many talents you are "The Master Of Disguise" and flit across the county in your Aston Martin emptying machines at will ?
sj
no it was a will hills and it was a £30 straight line
no it was a will hills and it was a £30 straight line
as for taking it out of context , that is what you do frequently.
Unsubstantiated nonsense.
i wont degrade myself in exchanging insults with you
Thinly veiled "I wanted to start an argument but am struggling to make any coherent points so I'll look for a quick exit strategy and try and claim the moral high ground and hope nobody notices"
you have just proven how you take things out of context . what a sad way to live . hypocrisy at its best.
the usual banks, twist and turns things with a discussion .
i dont seek arguments because i am not cantankerous like you
now go and do your home work little boy
Unsubstantiated nonsense.
i wont degrade myself in exchanging insults with you
Thinly veiled "I wanted to start an argument but am struggling to make any coherent points so I'll look for a quick exit strategy and try and claim the moral high ground and hope nobody notices"
you have just proven how you take things out of context . what a sad way to live . hypocrisy at its best.
the usual banks, twist and turns things with a discussion .
i dont seek arguments because i am not cantankerous like you
now go and do your home work little boy
Jul 16, 2012 -- 9:33AM, winker watson wrote:
i had a placepot at folkstone a few months back
sorry half the post was missing
maybe the tote link was down, i believe they take placepots on ordinary slips(not jackpots or scoop6) if this happens.
if not then as pointed before it makes zero sense
maybe the tote link was down, i believe they take placepots on ordinary slips(not jackpots or scoop6) if this happens.
if not then as pointed before it makes zero sense
It is a little strange that someone comes on, attempts to start an argument, and then has a go because you don't want to argue.
Strange world we live in.
Strange world we live in.
even stranger when a punter brown noses the bookmakers
you should be called
" brown nose bookie boy banks "
you should be called
" brown nose bookie boy banks "
by the way
A discussion is an exchange of information, but an argument is a contest of wills
like i said in my first question
1) why bother sticking up for them , even if what you say is correct , surely you have better things to do
you have blinkers on, thats why you want an arguement and not a discussion , ok brown nose bookie boy banks
A discussion is an exchange of information, but an argument is a contest of wills
like i said in my first question
1) why bother sticking up for them , even if what you say is correct , surely you have better things to do
you have blinkers on, thats why you want an arguement and not a discussion , ok brown nose bookie boy banks
even stranger when a punter brown noses the bookmakers
you should be called
" brown nose bookie boy banks "
There is a huge difference between understanding what battles can be won and being a "brown nose" (does any adult really use that term?).
Who do you think comes out best? The person who learns how the land lies and more importantly why it lies in such a fashion and adapts the way they behave to allow themselves to box a little bit more cleverly than he has done before or the pub bore who spouts nonsense about how unfair everything is yet affects no change?
you should be called
" brown nose bookie boy banks "
There is a huge difference between understanding what battles can be won and being a "brown nose" (does any adult really use that term?).
Who do you think comes out best? The person who learns how the land lies and more importantly why it lies in such a fashion and adapts the way they behave to allow themselves to box a little bit more cleverly than he has done before or the pub bore who spouts nonsense about how unfair everything is yet affects no change?
Banks playing the joey barton card,trying to sound intelligent
brown nose bookie boy banks , we all undersatnd why bookmakers refuse these bets , profits . the discussion or question i was putting to you is quite simple , yet you still are not understanding it.
why do you only post on threads relating to bookmakers refusing to take bets ? i dont see you discussing on any other threads on the horse racing forum ?
quite a simple question , yet in your usual way you have twisted it , like you will this reply .
why do you only post on threads relating to bookmakers refusing to take bets ? i dont see you discussing on any other threads on the horse racing forum ?
quite a simple question , yet in your usual way you have twisted it , like you will this reply .
I'm afraid I can't continue a conversation with such a childish and abusive individual.
You come across as a poor man's toronto44.
At least he balances things out a little and goes off and acts out his role as saviour to the third world when he is not abusing me.
You come across as a poor man's toronto44.
At least he balances things out a little and goes off and acts out his role as saviour to the third world when he is not abusing me.
I suspect you are one of the ever growing breed of new age stalkers who are just a little dim. Bless.
this was your reply to me . quite insulting . i was discussing, you were arguing , but as you were losing the dicussion you resorted to insults . now you say it was a conversation, yet a few replies ago you wanted me to continue the arguement . make your mind up .
like i just said at 18.25 , yet in your usual way you have twisted it , like you will this reply , and you just have , point proven .
you're a sad individual brown nose bookie boy banks
this was your reply to me . quite insulting . i was discussing, you were arguing , but as you were losing the dicussion you resorted to insults . now you say it was a conversation, yet a few replies ago you wanted me to continue the arguement . make your mind up .
like i just said at 18.25 , yet in your usual way you have twisted it , like you will this reply , and you just have , point proven .
you're a sad individual brown nose bookie boy banks
From your initial attempt to take the moral high ground and accuse me of being 14 you appear to have spiralled somewhat dramatically into a seething mess.
Human behaviour never ceases to amaze me.
Human behaviour never ceases to amaze me.
seething mess ? , ok , maybe not 14 , possibly 16 .
i am laughing at your pretence to be intelligent
i am also just playing you at your own game brown nose bookie boy banks and you dont like it do you
now run along and do your homework lad
, ok , maybe not 14 , possibly 16 .i am laughing at your pretence to be intelligent
i am also just playing you at your own game brown nose bookie boy banks and you dont like it do you
now run along and do your homework lad
Banned Banks to Harold Lloyd - You come across like a poor man's toronto44.
Unimaginable, frankly.
Unimaginable, frankly.
are you a bookmaker banks?
That must be right up there with the most asked questions on this forum!
That must be right up there with the most asked questions on this forum!
Are you Lazarus when he has taken his medication Bon Viveur because you are sounding increasingly like him....
^ But you have just commented on yet another bookmaker thread banks, (The undercover boss C4 one)
So surely you must understand peoples suspicions.
So surely you must understand peoples suspicions.
Are you Lazarus when he has taken his medication Bon Viveur because you are sounding increasingly like him....
I think I'm just a nutter magnet at the moment.
It's only a matter of time before someone links me to the New World Order or some such other conspiracy.
I think I'm just a nutter magnet at the moment.
It's only a matter of time before someone links me to the New World Order or some such other conspiracy.
Banned_Banks
16 Jul 12 20:34 Joined: 29 Apr 12 | Topic/replies: 324 | Blogger: Banned_Banks's blog
are you a bookmaker banks?
That must be right up there with the most asked questions on this forum!
maybe but it's a first for me.
ok next question, was your father a bookmaker banks?
16 Jul 12 20:34 Joined: 29 Apr 12 | Topic/replies: 324 | Blogger: Banned_Banks's blog
are you a bookmaker banks?
That must be right up there with the most asked questions on this forum!
maybe but it's a first for me.
ok next question, was your father a bookmaker banks?
The price of fame bon viveur.....
Same thing happened to David Icke no one believed him either...
Same thing happened to David Icke no one believed him either...
Trying to ignore that pompous fantasist banks but as he is constantly camped on here as the forums pro bookmaker mouthpiece and I have half an hour to spare.I thought it would be fun to highlight one of his most recent strange fantasies..
Banks said yesterday he had never said he claimed to be a celebrity only '" that he said he travelled a lot". This is exactly what he said in his post on the 16th May at 12.08 " ONE DAY I WILL REVEAL WHO I AM AND WHAT I DO.TO SAY THAT YOU WILL BE FEASTING ON HUMBLE PIE WHEN THAT HAPPENS WILL BE A MAJOR UNDERSTATEMENT". Now that suggests not just any ordinary celebrity but one so famous that we would all be shocked into silence........So banks which is the lie and which is the truth,are you a major celebrity or as you stated today just someone who travels a lot?
A bit of a sad case really but the message going through all his arguments is that bookmakers have every right to exploit and steal from the most vulnerable.Maybe he does not work for a bookmaker but just comes on constantly defending them, because he has nothing else to do and it gives him some form of perverse self importance.If he didn't keep defending the way bookmakers exploit and destroy so many vulneralble people.Really he should be pitied and ignored.
Banks said yesterday he had never said he claimed to be a celebrity only '" that he said he travelled a lot". This is exactly what he said in his post on the 16th May at 12.08 " ONE DAY I WILL REVEAL WHO I AM AND WHAT I DO.TO SAY THAT YOU WILL BE FEASTING ON HUMBLE PIE WHEN THAT HAPPENS WILL BE A MAJOR UNDERSTATEMENT". Now that suggests not just any ordinary celebrity but one so famous that we would all be shocked into silence........So banks which is the lie and which is the truth,are you a major celebrity or as you stated today just someone who travels a lot?
A bit of a sad case really but the message going through all his arguments is that bookmakers have every right to exploit and steal from the most vulnerable.Maybe he does not work for a bookmaker but just comes on constantly defending them, because he has nothing else to do and it gives him some form of perverse self importance.If he didn't keep defending the way bookmakers exploit and destroy so many vulneralble people.Really he should be pitied and ignored.
Tony Blair ,he has his morals.
I notice yesterday that his latest persona iwas a time gambler.....
"I have less than 5% of my turnover on horse racing"
Fantasist,know all,knows everything about everything........maybe something in those mfordy rumours||||
I notice yesterday that his latest persona iwas a time gambler.....
"I have less than 5% of my turnover on horse racing"
Fantasist,know all,knows everything about everything........maybe something in those mfordy rumours||||
Banned_Banks
16 Jul 12 20:34 Joined: 29 Apr 12 | Topic/replies: 325 | Blogger: Banned_Banks's blog
are you a bookmaker banks?
That must be right up there with the most asked questions on this forum!
AND THE MOST UNANSWERED
16 Jul 12 20:34 Joined: 29 Apr 12 | Topic/replies: 325 | Blogger: Banned_Banks's blog
are you a bookmaker banks?
That must be right up there with the most asked questions on this forum!
AND THE MOST UNANSWERED
Things have got really bad with betting on horseracing. Phones, Internet & Shops all opearte the same policy. If someone is only betting on UK & Irish Horseracing (i.e. not roulette, virtual racing/dogs and South African racing) you card is immediately marked.
The turnover from horseracing declines year-in, year-out. If bookies could stick 30 roulette machines instead of showing horseracing, they would do it at the drop of a hat.
Just today told by yet another shop can only have £25 on SP. You just get fed up with it in the end.
The turnover from horseracing declines year-in, year-out. If bookies could stick 30 roulette machines instead of showing horseracing, they would do it at the drop of a hat.
Just today told by yet another shop can only have £25 on SP. You just get fed up with it in the end.
desert pilot
Try a corals shop all x grades are now guaranteed a bullseye on except on price wise horses, if the staff say you can only have a pony on ask them to look at the new PTL and if you get no joy ask for a customer care card. Good Luck
Try a corals shop all x grades are now guaranteed a bullseye on except on price wise horses, if the staff say you can only have a pony on ask them to look at the new PTL and if you get no joy ask for a customer care card. Good Luck
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539