Dec 28, 2011 -- 9:13AM, T.I wrote:
after reading that article it would be dumb to believe you will get paid out. It also mentions the price was 28/1 when the horse was well ahead and coule not be caught up after the last hurdle. So maybe pre race and a few in play bets will be settled and the rest void?
what kind of justification can be used for that? i have lost money bets placing on horces that have fallen? did i get my money? no
Dec 28, 2011 -- 9:59AM, stealthgun wrote:
Am I right in thinking that all your money is tied up while they are investigating? Not right that.
correct
Dec 28, 2011 -- 10:32AM, pugs wrote:
The only reason it was still at 29 when it crossed the line was due to the sheer amount of money that was offered at 29, so no one can really argue the price was obviously wrong and therefore people should not be paid out.I did not get involved, and there may be other reasons why people will not get paid out, but crossing the line at 29 cannot be one of them.
I'd be happy to lay a horse at 29's when it crossed the line if I thought it was going to get disqualified