There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 4119 comments are related to the topic:
Usaidit's Bets and Banter Thread.
Usaidit's Bets and Banter Thread.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 4,119
|
By:
evening all
|
|
By:
Evening Pedro/FD
Decent shout yours earlier Peds and FD I've seen worse brainstorms. Backing The Randy Bishop to beat Cripsey Brook at Towcs - I don't think the bangor run was as bad as the pundits suggest....  |
|
By:
awful stuff may try something ir
|
|
By:
quite like the look of dandys runner in the next
|
|
By:
I've backed Clear Ice - just for fun though.
Dandy's not straightforward imo |
|
By:
probably havn't gone that in-depth very modest bet indeed. oh btw i am off to Musselburgh on Friday so if i get owt from the course will stick it up here.
|
|
By:
ffs oh well, at least i never laid the 2nd to place at 97.0
|
|
By:
nevening lads. any juicy tips for me? i'm fancyin millwall and overs
|
|
By:
not really gamsty, you got any fancies for the world cup i thought Mexico might be able to get through there round their at least.
|
|
By:
Green on Henretta's here
|
|
By:
evening all
I'm going to go in again-laying the draw england u17 vs czech u17 and looking to trade out if there's a goal |
|
By:
yeh mexico could get out of that. i think the bargain trade will be usa. already dropped a bit, was 100 the other day when i backed them. 90 now.
impressive when they beat spain 2-0 last year. had a 2-0 lead over brazil aswel. not a justified 100/1 shot and will get out of the group stage i think. my overall tip though would be brazil. |
|
By:
how much of a handicap do you see Argentinas manager?
|
|
By:
About 80lbs imo.
|
|
By:
yeh argentina are the team withthe big question mark over. undeniable ability and talent. easily good enough to win a world cup. but im sure u also watched some of their qualifying.
if they were to play the same in the world cup theyd be lucky to get out the group. the players didnt look like they knew what their doin, proabably scared of himaswel. he seems tactically inept. so yeh lol, i think with maradona at the helm they have very little chance. |
|
By:
so a decent lay really.
|
|
By:
Argentina's players on the whole are not nearly as good as in years gone by. Mexico will struggle imo but think USA are too big.
Place laying Celtic Change at Carlisle - think High Office will win.... |
|
By:
paraguay have trade potential also if santa cruz is fit.
|
|
By:
i am thinking of laying them in their group, i watched a fair few of their qualifying games and they cant defend.
|
|
By:
Backed the draw at The Den.
Think I'll get Usaidit's money tonight  |
|
By:
Early night for me as up for work at 5 and racing is pretty rum stuff.
Copa match tonight looks just about dead. Libertad are so negative that even though they lost the 1st game 3-0 they probably still won't attack. Chivas looked like rabbits in the headlights in Buenos Aires in there last away match but the atmosphere in Asuncion won't be anywhere near as intimidating. The 5.9 the away team on here, and more maybe the 1.93 under 2.5 goals could be the bets. Best of luck all |
|
By:
see u later drew
|
|
By:
kids won't sit back and settle for a draw
|
|
By:
3-1 and a lovely trade [;)]
|
|
By:
wd U
|
|
By:
cheers pedro
laying the draw and trading has been kind to me lately helps not being greedy about it |
|
By:
Thats good
Greed is the downfall of many a good man. Imo of course [:D] |
|
By:
and many a bad man too
 I'm always keener to trade out with the lays because of the greater liability ,not as eager on the backs |
|
By:
Yes I can understand that.
5f races are good for trading |
|
By:
morning all
 |
|
By:
 |
|
By:
good morning
|
|
By:
morning all
|
|
By:
Morning.
|
|
By:
alright giggsy,how are you,up late
|
|
By:
Good morning
|
|
By:
afters all from sunny wigan
|
|
By:
Good afternoon from cloudy Sheffield.
|
|
By:
well I spoke too soon-it's cloudy here now
my daughter went for a interview for a job with the council yesterday-they told her just now that she didn't get it :( |
|
By:
Bad luck. Is she the one who is being screwed ( not literally ) by the solicitor ?
|