New Posts For Thread: Lee mottersheadhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31892897/lee-mottersheadCan someone tell me what is Monday column is on about a new trackCorrect slicksterhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31892897/lee-mottershead?post_id=565184123#565184123Correct slicksterWed, 14 Jan 2026 07:18:53 -0600The point is being continuously missed. Liam Headd is the Lambourn correspondent. He's meant to be "in the game". If he is indeed "in the game" he absolutely should NOT need to rely on any data, Google, racing post etc to tell him Constitution hill ihttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31892897/lee-mottershead?post_id=565184115#565184115The point is being continuously missed. Liam Headd is the Lambourn correspondent. He's meant to be "in the game". If he is indeed "in the game" he absolutely should NOT need to rely on any data, Google, racing post etc to tell him Constitution hill iWed, 14 Jan 2026 07:13:35 -0600RP now shows 9yo after Con Hill was entered in the Champion Hurdle and at Southwell, so it looks like that is what triggers the age to be updated. A stupid system compared with doing the lot at new year (although I suppose the southern hemisphere wouhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31892897/lee-mottershead?post_id=565183999#565183999RP now shows 9yo after Con Hill was entered in the Champion Hurdle and at Southwell, so it looks like that is what triggers the age to be updated. A stupid system compared with doing the lot at new year (although I suppose the southern hemisphere wouWed, 14 Jan 2026 06:13:44 -0600My guess is the writer looked up Constitution Hill on the Post site.And that gives the wrong age but the right foaling date. Maybe the Post only updates ages when horses run because it would be too bloody obvious to do so at the new year.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31892897/lee-mottershead?post_id=565183091#565183091My guess is the writer looked up Constitution Hill on the Post site.And that gives the wrong age but the right foaling date. Maybe the Post only updates ages when horses run because it would be too bloody obvious to do so at the new year.Tue, 13 Jan 2026 08:32:44 -0600That's it judge. As stated Constitution Hill is a 9 year old. If Liam writing in the post doesn't know or understand the workings of a horses birthday that he clearly should not be writing in the paper.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31892897/lee-mottershead?post_id=565183007#565183007That's it judge. As stated Constitution Hill is a 9 year old. If Liam writing in the post doesn't know or understand the workings of a horses birthday that he clearly should not be writing in the paper.Tue, 13 Jan 2026 06:52:59 -0600https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31892897/lee-mottershead?post_id=565182879#565182879Tue, 13 Jan 2026 04:24:36 -0600Better bait needed,Top2.All Racehorses age a year on the 1st January each yearhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31892897/lee-mottershead?post_id=565182525#565182525Better bait needed,Top2.All Racehorses age a year on the 1st January each yearMon, 12 Jan 2026 16:36:00 -0600Broken news...https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31892897/lee-mottershead?post_id=565182341#565182341Broken news...Mon, 12 Jan 2026 14:14:15 -0600Lee was correct.Constitution Hill was a March foal so his 9th birthday is still a few weeks away.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31892897/lee-mottershead?post_id=565182277#565182277Lee was correct.Constitution Hill was a March foal so his 9th birthday is still a few weeks away.Mon, 12 Jan 2026 13:48:46 -0600Ignore that. 2017 makes him 9, but the Post does list Con Hill as an 8-year-old, and the link to his catalogue page is broken. So WTF is going on with the Post's database?https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31892897/lee-mottershead?post_id=565182251#565182251Ignore that. 2017 makes him 9, but the Post does list Con Hill as an 8-year-old, and the link to his catalogue page is broken. So WTF is going on with the Post's database?Mon, 12 Jan 2026 13:36:38 -0600