New Posts For Thread: timeform in-running oddshttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31828123/timeform-in-running-oddsfar from reliable these days eg yesterday Red Walls high 2.3 Was actually 9 with £154 matched bit of a difference !think it is just the IT bods doing what they were asked and when the spec for the scan was written it would be a rare occurence that there would be a big gap between the high £100+ and the actual high. But nowadays....https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31828123/timeform-in-running-odds?post_id=563711829#563711829think it is just the IT bods doing what they were asked and when the spec for the scan was written it would be a rare occurence that there would be a big gap between the high £100+ and the actual high. But nowadays....Sat, 06 Jan 2024 04:13:07 -0600Fair one, Dave, though that is frankly ridiculous logic (from BF), if that is the case.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31828123/timeform-in-running-odds?post_id=563711755#563711755Fair one, Dave, though that is frankly ridiculous logic (from BF), if that is the case.Sat, 06 Jan 2024 03:50:39 -0600Though the main takeaway imo is that the in running liquidity is very poor if no substantial money was bet above 2.3, even though some players thought the horse was an 8-1 chance.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31828123/timeform-in-running-odds?post_id=563711689#563711689Though the main takeaway imo is that the in running liquidity is very poor if no substantial money was bet above 2.3, even though some players thought the horse was an 8-1 chance.Sat, 06 Jan 2024 03:33:05 -0600The phrase used to decribe the data is "only bets of a payout of more than GBP100 included". It seems likely that this means that at least one single bet has to have a payout of more than £100. So if the £77 comprised of small bot staking and keephttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31828123/timeform-in-running-odds?post_id=563711667#563711667The phrase used to decribe the data is "only bets of a payout of more than GBP100 included". It seems likely that this means that at least one single bet has to have a payout of more than £100. So if the £77 comprised of small bot staking and keepSat, 06 Jan 2024 03:26:41 -0600£77 matched at 9.0 is a larger payout than £100, Kjansch, ergo, it should be included in the data.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31828123/timeform-in-running-odds?post_id=563711623#563711623£77 matched at 9.0 is a larger payout than £100, Kjansch, ergo, it should be included in the data.Sat, 06 Jan 2024 03:07:40 -0600There was 203 eur looking to lay at 4.8, i can see about 40 of that matched, then 115eur at 3, which looks as though near to fully matched.The price jumps around like a 'count the number of hops program' in between so its not certain that all the 115https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31828123/timeform-in-running-odds?post_id=563710383#563710383There was 203 eur looking to lay at 4.8, i can see about 40 of that matched, then 115eur at 3, which looks as though near to fully matched.The price jumps around like a 'count the number of hops program' in between so its not certain that all the 115Fri, 05 Jan 2024 11:51:28 -0600This isn't "prices available" - which would obviously run the risk of inaccuracy if taken from less granular data.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31828123/timeform-in-running-odds?post_id=563709911#563709911This isn't "prices available" - which would obviously run the risk of inaccuracy if taken from less granular data.Fri, 05 Jan 2024 08:51:55 -0600the simple stuff on promo etc is not related at all to the granular data. It is or should be accurate nonetheless. The highest price matched with £1OO+ payout is not something that should be inaccurate no matter where it comes from. It isn't intervahttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31828123/timeform-in-running-odds?post_id=563709899#563709899the simple stuff on promo etc is not related at all to the granular data. It is or should be accurate nonetheless. The highest price matched with £1OO+ payout is not something that should be inaccurate no matter where it comes from. It isn't intervaFri, 05 Jan 2024 08:49:10 -0600If it were me longbridge id run them off the same dataThe SP max min would just be a line of script that looked at each runner off the slowest IR refresh dataI’d be very surprised if that’s not what they dohttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31828123/timeform-in-running-odds?post_id=563709887#563709887If it were me longbridge id run them off the same dataThe SP max min would just be a line of script that looked at each runner off the slowest IR refresh dataI’d be very surprised if that’s not what they doFri, 05 Jan 2024 08:46:04 -0600Different stuff dusty - the BF "historic data" is time-series so you can see what was matched when (at coarse, fine, and per-match intervals, depending what you pay) - I guess for training 'bots.The SP prices files and the TF surfacing of it is justhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31828123/timeform-in-running-odds?post_id=563709879#563709879Different stuff dusty - the BF "historic data" is time-series so you can see what was matched when (at coarse, fine, and per-match intervals, depending what you pay) - I guess for training 'bots.The SP prices files and the TF surfacing of it is justFri, 05 Jan 2024 08:43:15 -0600