<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Would you rather...</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31810199/would-you-rather</link><description>back at 1.05, or lay at 21.0? and what would your reasons be?would you say that pro-rata the amount of 1.05 that lose was equal to the amount of 21.0 that win? mathematically it should be, but sometimes things don't work out like they should, as we a</description><item><title>in theory onlooker, the bets should have exactly the same chance of winning, giving the same profit. id favour laying though as you say</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31810199/would-you-rather?post_id=563297981#563297981</link><description>in theory onlooker, the bets should have exactly the same chance of winning, giving the same profit. id favour laying though as you say</description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2023 11:58:43 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Sooner back at 21 and lay it when it goes to 1.05</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31810199/would-you-rather?post_id=563297939#563297939</link><description>Sooner back at 21 and lay it when it goes to 1.05</description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2023 11:49:16 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>If you Back at 1.05 - Then - You only have ONE Chace of Winning If you Lay at 21.0 - Then - You have whole of the rest of the Field running for you.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31810199/would-you-rather?post_id=563297911#563297911</link><description>If you Back at 1.05 - Then - You only have ONE Chace of Winning If you Lay at 21.0 - Then - You have whole of the rest of the Field running for you.</description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2023 11:39:33 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>back at 1.05, or lay at 21.0? and what would your reasons be?would you say that pro-rata the amount of 1.05 that lose was equal to the amount of 21.0 that win? mathematically it should be, but sometimes things don't work out like they should, as we a</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31810199/would-you-rather?post_id=563297549#563297549</link><description>back at 1.05, or lay at 21.0? and what would your reasons be?would you say that pro-rata the amount of 1.05 that lose was equal to the amount of 21.0 that win? mathematically it should be, but sometimes things don't work out like they should, as we a</description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2023 10:10:49 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
