<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Constitution Hill 175 Faugheen 176</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31803931/constitution-hill-175-faugheen-176</link><description>WALOFS  ratings can be.</description><item><title>Completely agree. Form of champion hurdle looks solid. State man consistent performer rated 167 was beaten 9 lengths who had just comfortably beat the previous champion hurdler of 2 years then won comfortable after.Think Faugheen is the anomaly and h</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31803931/constitution-hill-175-faugheen-176?post_id=563168677#563168677</link><description>Completely agree. Form of champion hurdle looks solid. State man consistent performer rated 167 was beaten 9 lengths who had just comfortably beat the previous champion hurdler of 2 years then won comfortable after.Think Faugheen is the anomaly and h</description><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 13:52:58 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Would have GC as a very good horse on his performance at Cheltenham. I take the Ayr race with plenty of salt. Too late in the season. Maybe he wasn't 100% either. But maybe he was. Just one race. CH has shown a lot more. Highly likely State Man is a</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31803931/constitution-hill-175-faugheen-176?post_id=563168525#563168525</link><description>Would have GC as a very good horse on his performance at Cheltenham. I take the Ayr race with plenty of salt. Too late in the season. Maybe he wasn't 100% either. But maybe he was. Just one race. CH has shown a lot more. Highly likely State Man is a</description><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 13:09:32 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Yes you're probably right there.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31803931/constitution-hill-175-faugheen-176?post_id=563168513#563168513</link><description>Yes you're probably right there.</description><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 13:02:26 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>More perhaps than you realise layemall but sad to say a good few reluctant to voice an opinion imo?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31803931/constitution-hill-175-faugheen-176?post_id=563168507#563168507</link><description>More perhaps than you realise layemall but sad to say a good few reluctant to voice an opinion imo?</description><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 12:59:49 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>And I mostly agree with that statement Cag, if the plenty was changed to some.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31803931/constitution-hill-175-faugheen-176?post_id=563168501#563168501</link><description>And I mostly agree with that statement Cag, if the plenty was changed to some.</description><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 12:56:33 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>That is fair comment layemall but imo the RPRs given by their employees are no more informed or valid than plenty on here who have no vested interest other than saying what they see.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31803931/constitution-hill-175-faugheen-176?post_id=563168485#563168485</link><description>That is fair comment layemall but imo the RPRs given by their employees are no more informed or valid than plenty on here who have no vested interest other than saying what they see.</description><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 12:48:32 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>That is fair comment layemall but imo the RPRs given by their employees are no more informed or valid than plenty on here who have no vested interest other than saying what they see.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31803931/constitution-hill-175-faugheen-176?post_id=563168483#563168483</link><description>That is fair comment layemall but imo the RPRs given by their employees are no more informed or valid than plenty on here who have no vested interest other than saying what they see.</description><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 12:48:32 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I would have him behind every winner between 1968 and 1981. Those horses had proper campaigns, and were not wrapped up in cotton wool. They returned from one battle after another. I would also have Golden Cygnet above him on the basis of what he was</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31803931/constitution-hill-175-faugheen-176?post_id=563168479#563168479</link><description>I would have him behind every winner between 1968 and 1981. Those horses had proper campaigns, and were not wrapped up in cotton wool. They returned from one battle after another. I would also have Golden Cygnet above him on the basis of what he was</description><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 12:46:39 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Cag...you've got your opinion and I've got mine re ratings and anything else. I don't think the people who come up with some ratings that I don't agree with are dipsticks.....I just don't agree, simple as that.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31803931/constitution-hill-175-faugheen-176?post_id=563168469#563168469</link><description>Cag...you've got your opinion and I've got mine re ratings and anything else. I don't think the people who come up with some ratings that I don't agree with are dipsticks.....I just don't agree, simple as that.</description><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 12:40:50 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Cag , agree. Wonderful horses late 70's NNurse  Pigeon Monksfield even Bird's Nest but they all kept beating each other.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31803931/constitution-hill-175-faugheen-176?post_id=563168465#563168465</link><description>Cag , agree. Wonderful horses late 70's NNurse  Pigeon Monksfield even Bird's Nest but they all kept beating each other.</description><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 12:40:20 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
