<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Daytona Lady-not in picture!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31792779/daytona-lady-not-in-picture</link><description>Goons!</description><item><title>fair point but unlikely scenario in the current climate,  there's bugger all traded at most prices.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31792779/daytona-lady-not-in-picture?post_id=562955935#562955935</link><description>fair point but unlikely scenario in the current climate,  there's bugger all traded at most prices.</description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2023 17:45:55 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>could have 10p matched at every price from 44 to 990, resulting in a total payout of almost 5 grand.  but because none of them constitute a payout of over &Acirc;&pound;100 the in-running high is reported as 42.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31792779/daytona-lady-not-in-picture?post_id=562955923#562955923</link><description>could have 10p matched at every price from 44 to 990, resulting in a total payout of almost 5 grand.  but because none of them constitute a payout of over &Acirc;&pound;100 the in-running high is reported as 42.</description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2023 17:34:40 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>do you really want to know that a horse hit 1000 for 1p. behave yourself hulk.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31792779/daytona-lady-not-in-picture?post_id=562955881#562955881</link><description>do you really want to know that a horse hit 1000 for 1p. behave yourself hulk.</description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2023 17:12:26 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>i must be old skool.  matched at 42 and 85, the high's 85.  because that's higher than 42.unless you put an asterisk next to the 42 and explain at the bottom of the page which algorithms you've used to work out your own 'high' because you've personal</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31792779/daytona-lady-not-in-picture?post_id=562955843#562955843</link><description>i must be old skool.  matched at 42 and 85, the high's 85.  because that's higher than 42.unless you put an asterisk next to the 42 and explain at the bottom of the page which algorithms you've used to work out your own 'high' because you've personal</description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2023 16:45:54 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>&Acirc;&pound;1 matched at 95: &Acirc;&pound;1 matched = 50p staked ; payout=&Acirc;&pound;0.50+&Acirc;&pound;47, which is less than 100, so not shown; even &Acirc;&pound;1 staked at 95 is less than 100 and wouldn't show.The high is =&gt;2.39 staked at 42</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31792779/daytona-lady-not-in-picture?post_id=562955553#562955553</link><description>&Acirc;&pound;1 matched at 95: &Acirc;&pound;1 matched = 50p staked ; payout=&Acirc;&pound;0.50+&Acirc;&pound;47, which is less than 100, so not shown; even &Acirc;&pound;1 staked at 95 is less than 100 and wouldn't show.The high is =&gt;2.39 staked at 42</description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2023 14:27:58 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I had a &Acirc;&pound;20 bet the other day that won and I got 1000 max.Trouble is I got &Acirc;&pound;0.03p at 1000, &Acirc;&pound;0.04p. at 980 , &Acirc;&pound;0.10p at 880 etc, I think I ended up at 20 for &Acirc;&pound;20 average.I don't really want to see historical data stating it hit 1000, for 99.9% of</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31792779/daytona-lady-not-in-picture?post_id=562955395#562955395</link><description>I had a &Acirc;&pound;20 bet the other day that won and I got 1000 max.Trouble is I got &Acirc;&pound;0.03p at 1000, &Acirc;&pound;0.04p. at 980 , &Acirc;&pound;0.10p at 880 etc, I think I ended up at 20 for &Acirc;&pound;20 average.I don't really want to see historical data stating it hit 1000, for 99.9% of</description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2023 13:38:47 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>so &Acirc;&pound;1 matched at 95 isn't the high, &Acirc;&pound;2.39 at 42 is the high.except it isn't, 95 is.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31792779/daytona-lady-not-in-picture?post_id=562955379#562955379</link><description>so &Acirc;&pound;1 matched at 95 isn't the high, &Acirc;&pound;2.39 at 42 is the high.except it isn't, 95 is.</description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2023 13:35:31 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>So at least &Acirc;&pound;2.39 was staked at 42.0</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31792779/daytona-lady-not-in-picture?post_id=562955305#562955305</link><description>So at least &Acirc;&pound;2.39 was staked at 42.0</description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2023 13:07:17 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>IPMAX    Maximum price placed in-play (only bets of a payout of more than GBP100 included)IPMIN    Minimum price placed in-play (only bets of a payout of more than GBP100 included)So calculated by Purple method, rather than BF method of 100 matched.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31792779/daytona-lady-not-in-picture?post_id=562955297#562955297</link><description>IPMAX    Maximum price placed in-play (only bets of a payout of more than GBP100 included)IPMIN    Minimum price placed in-play (only bets of a payout of more than GBP100 included)So calculated by Purple method, rather than BF method of 100 matched.</description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2023 13:04:17 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>so was 7.4 the high, or was there much higher that they don't report to Timeform.  same as they've reported 42 as the high here but we have someone saying they saw 240.  highs the high isn't it, or maybe it isn't.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31792779/daytona-lady-not-in-picture?post_id=562955131#562955131</link><description>so was 7.4 the high, or was there much higher that they don't report to Timeform.  same as they've reported 42 as the high here but we have someone saying they saw 240.  highs the high isn't it, or maybe it isn't.</description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2023 11:50:43 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
