<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: One bookmaker per one hundred and fifty attendees....</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31678475/one-bookmaker-per-one-hundred-and-fifty-attendees</link><description>1. After assessing  bookmaker/attendee ratios for January/February 2020....how does such a 'one size fits all' approach toward attendance correlate with a social distancing strategy designed to ensure covid security ?2.It is disappointing that JCR ha</description><item><title>multi pitch holders displaying why there is no unity in rings</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31678475/one-bookmaker-per-one-hundred-and-fifty-attendees?post_id=560210377#560210377</link><description>multi pitch holders displaying why there is no unity in rings</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2020 06:20:07 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Morning Sugersteve1....You are spot on, the number of books able to provide a SAFE and competitive betting environment for attendees at each course is HIGHLY subjective, and is hugely dependant on the layout of the betting ring.As I've said, JCR have</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31678475/one-bookmaker-per-one-hundred-and-fifty-attendees?post_id=560205955#560205955</link><description>Morning Sugersteve1....You are spot on, the number of books able to provide a SAFE and competitive betting environment for attendees at each course is HIGHLY subjective, and is hugely dependant on the layout of the betting ring.As I've said, JCR have</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2020 03:40:36 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>i am not a layer swaddle as i stated when i joined the comp ,its not what was wrong with any particular comment its you never miss a chance of having a pop at racecourse bookmakers.regarding the comps which you just brought up the tipping comp which</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31678475/one-bookmaker-per-one-hundred-and-fifty-attendees?post_id=560205873#560205873</link><description>i am not a layer swaddle as i stated when i joined the comp ,its not what was wrong with any particular comment its you never miss a chance of having a pop at racecourse bookmakers.regarding the comps which you just brought up the tipping comp which</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2020 02:54:24 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Jimnast, just had a look at the lay comp and can see why old bookies don't do any laying anymore .What was wrong about my comment, thanks</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31678475/one-bookmaker-per-one-hundred-and-fifty-attendees?post_id=560205867#560205867</link><description>Jimnast, just had a look at the lay comp and can see why old bookies don't do any laying anymore .What was wrong about my comment, thanks</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2020 02:47:00 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>what a surprise swaddle pops up on a bookmaker thread even late on a sunday night he can not help himself with this obsession.its unhealthy going through life the way you do,i wonder what other unhealthy obsessions you have whilst been alone late at</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31678475/one-bookmaker-per-one-hundred-and-fifty-attendees?post_id=560205819#560205819</link><description>what a surprise swaddle pops up on a bookmaker thread even late on a sunday night he can not help himself with this obsession.its unhealthy going through life the way you do,i wonder what other unhealthy obsessions you have whilst been alone late at</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2020 02:08:19 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Number per book is subjective.  Personally, I would have suggested a ration of 100:1.  In my opinion, Racecourses have selected this number but also feel it could be reviewed, so Mug pls raise with AGT</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31678475/one-bookmaker-per-one-hundred-and-fifty-attendees?post_id=560205553#560205553</link><description>Number per book is subjective.  Personally, I would have suggested a ration of 100:1.  In my opinion, Racecourses have selected this number but also feel it could be reviewed, so Mug pls raise with AGT</description><pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2020 17:35:29 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Use exchange No chance of breaching social distancing and better prices In my opinion.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31678475/one-bookmaker-per-one-hundred-and-fifty-attendees?post_id=560205463#560205463</link><description>Use exchange No chance of breaching social distancing and better prices In my opinion.</description><pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:56:38 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>1. After assessing  bookmaker/attendee ratios for January/February 2020....how does such a 'one size fits all' approach toward attendance correlate with a social distancing strategy designed to ensure covid security ?2.It is disappointing that JCR ha</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31678475/one-bookmaker-per-one-hundred-and-fifty-attendees?post_id=560204017#560204017</link><description>1. After assessing  bookmaker/attendee ratios for January/February 2020....how does such a 'one size fits all' approach toward attendance correlate with a social distancing strategy designed to ensure covid security ?2.It is disappointing that JCR ha</description><pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2020 12:45:50 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
