<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Sophie Ralston</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31452881/sophie-ralston</link><description>Sophie Ellis Bexter woulda done better.</description><item><title>Thank you George. You see when I first started backing horses top weights in handicaps were conceding 2 stone or more at times so I don't concern myself too much with these narrow bands we now have.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31452881/sophie-ralston?post_id=555594623#555594623</link><description>Thank you George. You see when I first started backing horses top weights in handicaps were conceding 2 stone or more at times so I don't concern myself too much with these narrow bands we now have.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2018 12:53:19 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>It came across to me that you were poo pooing my post.But we're not going to have a cyber falling out over it, so we'll agree to disagree, and I'll wish you luck with your bets.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31452881/sophie-ralston?post_id=555594545#555594545</link><description>It came across to me that you were poo pooing my post.But we're not going to have a cyber falling out over it, so we'll agree to disagree, and I'll wish you luck with your bets.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2018 12:48:36 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I wasn't trying to be clever at all, but think what you like if it suits you.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31452881/sophie-ralston?post_id=555594493#555594493</link><description>I wasn't trying to be clever at all, but think what you like if it suits you.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2018 12:44:17 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>you thought you were being clever pulling me up about my 18.26 post, and then when I point out to you that without FF and LV in the field (who are ineligible for 0-50s), she hits the frame, you're still claiming 0-50, 0-55s, they're all the same.No t</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31452881/sophie-ralston?post_id=555594455#555594455</link><description>you thought you were being clever pulling me up about my 18.26 post, and then when I point out to you that without FF and LV in the field (who are ineligible for 0-50s), she hits the frame, you're still claiming 0-50, 0-55s, they're all the same.No t</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2018 12:41:05 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I also think it is ridiculous to expect Class 6 and 7 horses to run to their marks so consistently. But as ever you know best.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31452881/sophie-ralston?post_id=555594371#555594371</link><description>I also think it is ridiculous to expect Class 6 and 7 horses to run to their marks so consistently. But as ever you know best.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2018 12:35:07 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>It made a difference to your 4tp bet and anyone who'd backed it EW at 66s. To say that a horse rated 50 or under has an equal chance of winning in 0-55 as it does in a 0-50, is a ridiculous statement to make, imo.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31452881/sophie-ralston?post_id=555594341#555594341</link><description>It made a difference to your 4tp bet and anyone who'd backed it EW at 66s. To say that a horse rated 50 or under has an equal chance of winning in 0-55 as it does in a 0-50, is a ridiculous statement to make, imo.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2018 12:32:27 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I said hardly any difference George. At this level a pound or two is nothing much at all.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31452881/sophie-ralston?post_id=555594285#555594285</link><description>I said hardly any difference George. At this level a pound or two is nothing much at all.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2018 12:28:40 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I don't agree with that, Langley Vale and Furni Factors would be ineligible for a 0-50, so it would have placed without them in the field.Time Medicean is rated 51, so suppose he would get into a 0-50 under the +2lb rating band that they now have.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31452881/sophie-ralston?post_id=555594247#555594247</link><description>I don't agree with that, Langley Vale and Furni Factors would be ineligible for a 0-50, so it would have placed without them in the field.Time Medicean is rated 51, so suppose he would get into a 0-50 under the +2lb rating band that they now have.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2018 12:26:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>3 of those runners ran in a Class 7 at Lingfield 17 days ago. There's hardly any difference with just 5lbs difference at the top of the weights.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31452881/sophie-ralston?post_id=555594095#555594095</link><description>3 of those runners ran in a Class 7 at Lingfield 17 days ago. There's hardly any difference with just 5lbs difference at the top of the weights.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2018 12:07:03 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Aye, missed break, ran on to be a never nearer 5th.awful form figures, dunno why they didn't wait until the class 7 0-50s start in the AW season, still wudda been a price.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31452881/sophie-ralston?post_id=555593987#555593987</link><description>Aye, missed break, ran on to be a never nearer 5th.awful form figures, dunno why they didn't wait until the class 7 0-50s start in the AW season, still wudda been a price.</description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2018 11:51:49 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
