<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Weakest Hardwicke ever ?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31422697/weakest-hardwicke-ever</link><description>5 runners, featuring 1 group 1 horse, followed home by 3 listed / group 3 horses and a regressive stayer in last.Has there ever been a weaker Hardwicke.Where were the best 12f horses ? That is the race Cracksman should have run in.</description><item><title>I personally wouldn't have looked at it as a negative myself. I just don't get why there isn't a Group 1 12f race at the meeting.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31422697/weakest-hardwicke-ever?post_id=554836273#554836273</link><description>I personally wouldn't have looked at it as a negative myself. I just don't get why there isn't a Group 1 12f race at the meeting.</description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2018 09:45:36 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Cracksman would have been considered the best middle distance colt in training in Europe (probably still is). Opting for a group 2 in the middle of the season at the most prestigious meeting just wasn't ever going to happen!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31422697/weakest-hardwicke-ever?post_id=554836203#554836203</link><description>Cracksman would have been considered the best middle distance colt in training in Europe (probably still is). Opting for a group 2 in the middle of the season at the most prestigious meeting just wasn't ever going to happen!</description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2018 09:42:58 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I agree in many ways, but he is already 2 times Group 1 winner at 10f, and his Group 1 win at Epsom over 12f was far from impressive. A runaway winner at Royal Ascot over 12f would have boosted his L'Arc and King George claims and increased his value</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31422697/weakest-hardwicke-ever?post_id=554836117#554836117</link><description>I agree in many ways, but he is already 2 times Group 1 winner at 10f, and his Group 1 win at Epsom over 12f was far from impressive. A runaway winner at Royal Ascot over 12f would have boosted his L'Arc and King George claims and increased his value</description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2018 09:36:18 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>There's zero value in running him in that under a penalty, unless they were desperate for a RA win. 10F is preferable for the breeding sheds. They would have expected to have won the PoW comfortably anyway, hindsight is a wonderful thing!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31422697/weakest-hardwicke-ever?post_id=554836073#554836073</link><description>There's zero value in running him in that under a penalty, unless they were desperate for a RA win. 10F is preferable for the breeding sheds. They would have expected to have won the PoW comfortably anyway, hindsight is a wonderful thing!</description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2018 09:33:19 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>He's not a 10f horse ideally though is he Cider, he looks like he wants 12f these days. One could argue would upgrading the Hardwicke to Group 1 make it attract better horses. Given there is no older horse 12f Group 1 at the meeting, it seems strange</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31422697/weakest-hardwicke-ever?post_id=554835983#554835983</link><description>He's not a 10f horse ideally though is he Cider, he looks like he wants 12f these days. One could argue would upgrading the Hardwicke to Group 1 make it attract better horses. Given there is no older horse 12f Group 1 at the meeting, it seems strange</description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2018 09:25:33 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Multiple group 1 winning Cracksman should have instead run in a group 2 as an alternative to the premier race of the week for which he was long odds on for</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31422697/weakest-hardwicke-ever?post_id=554835917#554835917</link><description>Multiple group 1 winning Cracksman should have instead run in a group 2 as an alternative to the premier race of the week for which he was long odds on for</description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2018 09:18:44 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>quite a few races this week have had a thin look to them imo</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31422697/weakest-hardwicke-ever?post_id=554835867#554835867</link><description>quite a few races this week have had a thin look to them imo</description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2018 09:14:15 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Chesham rarely is a good race pre Ascot, full of a number of unknown unexposed horses, however often the winner is decent.The winner is now a 2 times Group 2 winner and easy Group 2 winner at that, and was a decent 2nd in the St Ledger, that would su</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31422697/weakest-hardwicke-ever?post_id=554835849#554835849</link><description>Chesham rarely is a good race pre Ascot, full of a number of unknown unexposed horses, however often the winner is decent.The winner is now a 2 times Group 2 winner and easy Group 2 winner at that, and was a decent 2nd in the St Ledger, that would su</description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2018 09:13:26 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>werent a great chesham either</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31422697/weakest-hardwicke-ever?post_id=554835833#554835833</link><description>werent a great chesham either</description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2018 09:11:57 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Who was the group 1 horse ??</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/31422697/weakest-hardwicke-ever?post_id=554835823#554835823</link><description>Who was the group 1 horse ??</description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2018 09:11:23 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
