New Posts For Thread: Can't be money backhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30991843/cant-be-money-backmust be void surelyvoidhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30991843/cant-be-money-back?post_id=563827937#563827937voidSun, 25 Feb 2024 09:16:47 -0600Pity it didn't happen in Lingers listed 5f race yesterdayhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30991843/cant-be-money-back?post_id=553597743#553597743Pity it didn't happen in Lingers listed 5f race yesterdaySun, 25 Feb 2018 07:58:47 -0600Yes you have to void all bets because these days it's layers as well as backers that could be s hafted. Imagine if an even money fav gets left in the Nunthorpe. Then layers could have big liabilities on the winner if the fav is beaten. Just cos it'shttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30991843/cant-be-money-back?post_id=553597715#553597715Yes you have to void all bets because these days it's layers as well as backers that could be s hafted. Imagine if an even money fav gets left in the Nunthorpe. Then layers could have big liabilities on the winner if the fav is beaten. Just cos it'sSun, 25 Feb 2018 07:55:48 -0600aye very strange..its cost it about 2L but they say no harm done..as been said it was derby and the fav they'd be uproar.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30991843/cant-be-money-back?post_id=553597667#553597667aye very strange..its cost it about 2L but they say no harm done..as been said it was derby and the fav they'd be uproar.Sun, 25 Feb 2018 07:50:53 -0600Best way to deal with this kind of thing would be to let the result stand for prize money but void all bets.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30991843/cant-be-money-back?post_id=553597573#553597573Best way to deal with this kind of thing would be to let the result stand for prize money but void all bets.Sun, 25 Feb 2018 07:35:31 -0600Flint added: "I was told the rule is that 33 per cent of the horses have to be inconvenienced to have voided the race. But this needs to be looked at.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30991843/cant-be-money-back?post_id=553597543#553597543Flint added: "I was told the rule is that 33 per cent of the horses have to be inconvenienced to have voided the race. But this needs to be looked at.Sun, 25 Feb 2018 07:32:10 -0600Begs the question doesn't it Howard, what is a 'sufficient number of runners'?https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30991843/cant-be-money-back?post_id=553597529#553597529Begs the question doesn't it Howard, what is a 'sufficient number of runners'?Sun, 25 Feb 2018 07:29:08 -0600Begs the question doesn't it Howard, what is a 'sufficient number of runners'?https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30991843/cant-be-money-back?post_id=553597527#553597527Begs the question doesn't it Howard, what is a 'sufficient number of runners'?Sun, 25 Feb 2018 07:29:07 -0600It's entirely possible that the horse could have finished 2nd rather than 3rd. So betting winnings/losses involved as well as stakes.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30991843/cant-be-money-back?post_id=553596773#553596773It's entirely possible that the horse could have finished 2nd rather than 3rd. So betting winnings/losses involved as well as stakes.Sun, 25 Feb 2018 05:02:57 -0600" ...the malfunction had not materially prejudiced a sufficient number of runners" So in future everything is fine as long as only one horse has been left in the stalls ?https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30991843/cant-be-money-back?post_id=553596751#553596751" ...the malfunction had not materially prejudiced a sufficient number of runners" So in future everything is fine as long as only one horse has been left in the stalls ?Sun, 25 Feb 2018 04:53:17 -0600