<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Boycott the Racing Post</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30985157/boycott-the-racing-post</link><description>This filthy rag had done nothing over the years except stab punters in the back. Recently as the Guardian pointed out they front page headlined the blatant lie that FOBT's at &Acirc;&pound;2 per throw would be a disaster for Racing, a blatant lie. I would encour</description><item><title>I'm sure Simon Clare would deny this under oath and make you out to be a liar oh the reality of betting on Horse Racing</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30985157/boycott-the-racing-post?post_id=553469817#553469817</link><description>I'm sure Simon Clare would deny this under oath and make you out to be a liar oh the reality of betting on Horse Racing</description><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 06:15:09 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>parispikeTalking about the big boys Sat having a glass of wine tonight and I get a phone call from an irate pal of mine who tried to get a bullseye on a 9/2 chance at Leicester today with korals.After a lengthy phone discussion he was offer &Acirc;&pound;4 and c</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30985157/boycott-the-racing-post?post_id=553466777#553466777</link><description>parispikeTalking about the big boys Sat having a glass of wine tonight and I get a phone call from an irate pal of mine who tried to get a bullseye on a 9/2 chance at Leicester today with korals.After a lengthy phone discussion he was offer &Acirc;&pound;4 and c</description><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 14:23:57 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I might have made a mistake with my calculation. Upping the number of fobts per shop to 3.9, expenses &Acirc;&pound;50k per year/per shop and and factors remaining the same eg:- Per Shop per wk = 3.9 (fobt) x &Acirc;&pound;1k = &Acirc;&pound;3.9k (before expenses)Net Profit per shop pe</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30985157/boycott-the-racing-post?post_id=553466731#553466731</link><description>I might have made a mistake with my calculation. Upping the number of fobts per shop to 3.9, expenses &Acirc;&pound;50k per year/per shop and and factors remaining the same eg:- Per Shop per wk = 3.9 (fobt) x &Acirc;&pound;1k = &Acirc;&pound;3.9k (before expenses)Net Profit per shop pe</description><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 14:09:00 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Reckon -  the average number of machines is nearer 3.9 per shopoperating costs somewhat more than you suggest. Staff, rates, heating etc but nevertheless the RISK FREE profit is huge.Independents suffer doubly by paying more per shop than the big boy</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30985157/boycott-the-racing-post?post_id=553466625#553466625</link><description>Reckon -  the average number of machines is nearer 3.9 per shopoperating costs somewhat more than you suggest. Staff, rates, heating etc but nevertheless the RISK FREE profit is huge.Independents suffer doubly by paying more per shop than the big boy</description><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:46:31 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Back of a ciggi paper calculation and assuming an average of 3.5 fobt per shop eg:- Per annum income = 3.5 (fobt) x &Acirc;&pound;1000 (profit) x 52 (wks) = &Acirc;&pound;182 before operation costs. Assuming operation costs of &Acirc;&pound;50k per annum = &Acirc;&pound;(182 - 50)k = &Acirc;&pound;130k net pr</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30985157/boycott-the-racing-post?post_id=553466389#553466389</link><description>Back of a ciggi paper calculation and assuming an average of 3.5 fobt per shop eg:- Per annum income = 3.5 (fobt) x &Acirc;&pound;1000 (profit) x 52 (wks) = &Acirc;&pound;182 before operation costs. Assuming operation costs of &Acirc;&pound;50k per annum = &Acirc;&pound;(182 - 50)k = &Acirc;&pound;130k net pr</description><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:03:22 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Each FOBT makes on average around &Acirc;&pound;1000 per week. The average number of FOBTs per shop is marginally less than the maximum permitted of 4.Some might conclude the media rights payments of &Acirc;&pound;30,000 pa plus other costs are worth &Acirc;&pound;1000 x 4 X 52.I could</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30985157/boycott-the-racing-post?post_id=553465983#553465983</link><description>Each FOBT makes on average around &Acirc;&pound;1000 per week. The average number of FOBTs per shop is marginally less than the maximum permitted of 4.Some might conclude the media rights payments of &Acirc;&pound;30,000 pa plus other costs are worth &Acirc;&pound;1000 x 4 X 52.I could</description><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 12:10:21 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>The excuse the BHA and the sh1tty Racing Post are using that horse racing levy from the probable closure of the "crack cocaine" bookie shops from a &Acirc;&pound;2 max limit per spin will be significantly reduced is an over exaggeration and scaremongering, to sa</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30985157/boycott-the-racing-post?post_id=553465803#553465803</link><description>The excuse the BHA and the sh1tty Racing Post are using that horse racing levy from the probable closure of the "crack cocaine" bookie shops from a &Acirc;&pound;2 max limit per spin will be significantly reduced is an over exaggeration and scaremongering, to sa</description><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 11:43:06 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>spot on pp</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30985157/boycott-the-racing-post?post_id=553464305#553464305</link><description>spot on pp</description><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 07:07:14 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>What happened to the days when the bookmakers took on the punters..?The FOBTs and Betfair happened (at more less the same time). The former prevented the need to react to the latter as they guaranteed risk free profit. Over time the off course books</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30985157/boycott-the-racing-post?post_id=553464199#553464199</link><description>What happened to the days when the bookmakers took on the punters..?The FOBTs and Betfair happened (at more less the same time). The former prevented the need to react to the latter as they guaranteed risk free profit. Over time the off course books</description><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 06:48:54 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Ive never touched the FPBTs but if as mooted it did go down to &Acirc;&pound;2 a throw and I had &Acirc;&pound;400 to play with I would (god forbid) play the cartoon horse racing or the dogs, as there is a greater element of chance involved (dogs knocked over at first bend</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30985157/boycott-the-racing-post?post_id=553464179#553464179</link><description>Ive never touched the FPBTs but if as mooted it did go down to &Acirc;&pound;2 a throw and I had &Acirc;&pound;400 to play with I would (god forbid) play the cartoon horse racing or the dogs, as there is a greater element of chance involved (dogs knocked over at first bend</description><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 06:41:31 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
