<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Winning distance - 1:50 Warwick</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30949589/winning-distance---150-warwick</link><description>Backed the fav to win by more than 2.5 lengths! Looked 3.25 to me, they give 2.5. Naughty judge</description><item><title>what do you mean by freeze frame? the winning distance (indeed all distances between runners in the formbook) is the gap between them as each of them crosses the line (cos they havent finished the race til they cross the line) rather than the gaps be</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30949589/winning-distance---150-warwick?post_id=552875537#552875537</link><description>what do you mean by freeze frame? the winning distance (indeed all distances between runners in the formbook) is the gap between them as each of them crosses the line (cos they havent finished the race til they cross the line) rather than the gaps be</description><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 10:34:51 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I play the distances a lot and some of the decisions are beyond belief. Surely a simple freeze frame can give a trained judge (and most others) an accurate answer. Why the need for 'times' ? I suppose the view to take is that it probably evens out in</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30949589/winning-distance---150-warwick?post_id=552875405#552875405</link><description>I play the distances a lot and some of the decisions are beyond belief. Surely a simple freeze frame can give a trained judge (and most others) an accurate answer. Why the need for 'times' ? I suppose the view to take is that it probably evens out in</description><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 09:55:53 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Im fully aware how its worked out, just unsure whether they got it right this time. There are other occasions where the distances are declared incorrectly</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30949589/winning-distance---150-warwick?post_id=552875099#552875099</link><description>Im fully aware how its worked out, just unsure whether they got it right this time. There are other occasions where the distances are declared incorrectly</description><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 08:55:48 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>nowt to do with judge's opinion -</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30949589/winning-distance---150-warwick?post_id=552874843#552874843</link><description>nowt to do with judge's opinion -</description><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 08:11:10 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>it's done by times, not 'how it looks'</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30949589/winning-distance---150-warwick?post_id=552874841#552874841</link><description>it's done by times, not 'how it looks'</description><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 08:10:33 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Backed the fav to win by more than 2.5 lengths! Looked 3.25 to me, they give 2.5. Naughty judge</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30949589/winning-distance---150-warwick?post_id=552874835#552874835</link><description>Backed the fav to win by more than 2.5 lengths! Looked 3.25 to me, they give 2.5. Naughty judge</description><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 08:07:09 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
