<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Dartmouth 1.16 layer on the line</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30931801/dartmouth-116-layer-on-the-line</link><description>Nice bet</description><item><title>think vast majority did, HH</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30931801/dartmouth-116-layer-on-the-line?post_id=552666405#552666405</link><description>think vast majority did, HH</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2017 09:27:54 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>thats understandable if it was in real time</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30931801/dartmouth-116-layer-on-the-line?post_id=552666403#552666403</link><description>thats understandable if it was in real time</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2017 09:27:41 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>going past the line 'live' i thought Dartmouth had won duncan...</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30931801/dartmouth-116-layer-on-the-line?post_id=552666391#552666391</link><description>going past the line 'live' i thought Dartmouth had won duncan...</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2017 09:26:24 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>1.05 was lowest...?fk sake my graphs must be slow then....i was surprised Dartmouth didn't hit 1.01 with the thin in running liquidity we are subjected to now.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30931801/dartmouth-116-layer-on-the-line?post_id=552666383#552666383</link><description>1.05 was lowest...?fk sake my graphs must be slow then....i was surprised Dartmouth didn't hit 1.01 with the thin in running liquidity we are subjected to now.</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2017 09:25:47 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>disagree that looked 1.01 minus stewards possibility...honestly thought Montaly had nodded perfectly and dived for remote</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30931801/dartmouth-116-layer-on-the-line?post_id=552666373#552666373</link><description>disagree that looked 1.01 minus stewards possibility...honestly thought Montaly had nodded perfectly and dived for remote</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2017 09:24:33 -0500</pubDate></item><item><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30931801/dartmouth-116-layer-on-the-line?post_id=552666359#552666359</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2017 09:23:24 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>think he means its 1.01 the 1.16 was laid on the basis there might be a stewards</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30931801/dartmouth-116-layer-on-the-line?post_id=552666349#552666349</link><description>think he means its 1.01 the 1.16 was laid on the basis there might be a stewards</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2017 09:22:29 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>1.05 lowest</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30931801/dartmouth-116-layer-on-the-line?post_id=552666345#552666345</link><description>1.05 lowest</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2017 09:22:07 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>i thought lowest price was 1.16....?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30931801/dartmouth-116-layer-on-the-line?post_id=552666297#552666297</link><description>i thought lowest price was 1.16....?</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2017 09:16:35 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>1.01 was layed on the basis of a forthcoming stewards..not a man in world thort dartmouth hadnt held on going over line.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30931801/dartmouth-116-layer-on-the-line?post_id=552666273#552666273</link><description>1.01 was layed on the basis of a forthcoming stewards..not a man in world thort dartmouth hadnt held on going over line.</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2017 09:15:09 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
