New Posts For Thread: chuck that outhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30869703/chuck-that-outhundred onBy failing to make Denmead the outright winner, what the rules are saying is you can bump a rival and get away with it. That is a dangerous precedent, imo. The rules are essentially promoting poor jockeyship.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30869703/chuck-that-out?post_id=551820417#551820417By failing to make Denmead the outright winner, what the rules are saying is you can bump a rival and get away with it. That is a dangerous precedent, imo. The rules are essentially promoting poor jockeyship.Wed, 03 May 2017 05:50:57 -0500THEY DONT THROW FAVS OUT AT WOLVS,THE PLACE IS A FLAPPING TRACK,END OF!https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30869703/chuck-that-out?post_id=551817749#551817749THEY DONT THROW FAVS OUT AT WOLVS,THE PLACE IS A FLAPPING TRACK,END OF!Tue, 02 May 2017 15:28:12 -0500let's forget it was a dead-heat and assume it got beat a nose,would they have come to the same conclusion ?!https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30869703/chuck-that-out?post_id=551817717#551817717let's forget it was a dead-heat and assume it got beat a nose,would they have come to the same conclusion ?!Tue, 02 May 2017 15:26:47 -0500Add a course of logic for all stewards' training plz - along with geometry as they can't seem to work out the effect of horses being knocked or pushed sideways across the width of the track either!https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30869703/chuck-that-out?post_id=551817647#551817647Add a course of logic for all stewards' training plz - along with geometry as they can't seem to work out the effect of horses being knocked or pushed sideways across the width of the track either!Tue, 02 May 2017 15:19:48 -0500Unless Denmead was bumped into from behind and knocked forward without any impairment of its momentum there must be some physical effect from a bump and therefore what appeared to be a dead heat would most likely result in Denmead returning a time frhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30869703/chuck-that-out?post_id=551817615#551817615Unless Denmead was bumped into from behind and knocked forward without any impairment of its momentum there must be some physical effect from a bump and therefore what appeared to be a dead heat would most likely result in Denmead returning a time frTue, 02 May 2017 15:17:55 -0500THE FCL GLOBAL FORWARDING MAKING LOGISTICS PERSONAL HANDICAP STAKES (CLASS 5)The Stewards held an enquiry under Rule (B)11.6 into possible interference off the final bend. Having heard their evidence and viewed recordings of the race they found thathttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30869703/chuck-that-out?post_id=551817391#551817391THE FCL GLOBAL FORWARDING MAKING LOGISTICS PERSONAL HANDICAP STAKES (CLASS 5)The Stewards held an enquiry under Rule (B)11.6 into possible interference off the final bend. Having heard their evidence and viewed recordings of the race they found thatTue, 02 May 2017 15:04:59 -0500Astonishing decision imo. Worst ive ever seen. We separate horses by a pixel in a photo dont we?https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30869703/chuck-that-out?post_id=551817219#551817219Astonishing decision imo. Worst ive ever seen. We separate horses by a pixel in a photo dont we?Tue, 02 May 2017 14:50:33 -0500sick... dont they pay double result?https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30869703/chuck-that-out?post_id=551817199#551817199sick... dont they pay double result?Tue, 02 May 2017 14:49:45 -0500At the time of the bump Den. was 1/2 length behind. In view of that and the dead heat how can it be argued that the interference did not improve Mast's placing?https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30869703/chuck-that-out?post_id=551817149#551817149At the time of the bump Den. was 1/2 length behind. In view of that and the dead heat how can it be argued that the interference did not improve Mast's placing?Tue, 02 May 2017 14:45:02 -0500fear,high street bookies would have preferred the fav to be thrown out to halt running up bets from other winning favs.obviouslypaying out half winnings/stake on both is no different than paying 100% on one or tother, only relevance is which horsehttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30869703/chuck-that-out?post_id=551817069#551817069fear,high street bookies would have preferred the fav to be thrown out to halt running up bets from other winning favs.obviouslypaying out half winnings/stake on both is no different than paying 100% on one or tother, only relevance is which horseTue, 02 May 2017 14:36:11 -0500