<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Rule 4 Deductions and the Bookmakers.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30776631/rule-4-deductions-and-the-bookmakers</link><description>Bookmaker hits out over rule 4 'sharp practice' BY JON LEES 9:31AM 4 JAN 2017 A PROMINENT racecourse bookmaker has described the shortening of the odds of horses who appear likely to become non-runners - and therefore cause a rule 4 deduction from wi</description><item><title>Did any course bookmakers take Millington of Racing Post to task for such irresponsible posting as to make claim regulator was looking into so called sharp practices. Nothing less than libelous</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30776631/rule-4-deductions-and-the-bookmakers?post_id=550805825#550805825</link><description>Did any course bookmakers take Millington of Racing Post to task for such irresponsible posting as to make claim regulator was looking into so called sharp practices. Nothing less than libelous</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 15:17:28 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Yes, there a few missing in action after that technical disqualification at Catterick recently as well</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30776631/rule-4-deductions-and-the-bookmakers?post_id=550804885#550804885</link><description>Yes, there a few missing in action after that technical disqualification at Catterick recently as well</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 12:59:42 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>very few punters headmaster ever mention why they never brought there winnings back after a changed result,or in the recent lingfield case the wrong result.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30776631/rule-4-deductions-and-the-bookmakers?post_id=550804829#550804829</link><description>very few punters headmaster ever mention why they never brought there winnings back after a changed result,or in the recent lingfield case the wrong result.</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 12:48:12 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>No bookmaker ever mentions the tickets that are never reclaimed on late nons/withdrawn horses.  So are we to assume all stakes are always reclaimed?I'm struggling with that proposal, particularly in the sort of circumstances that prevailed at Chelten</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30776631/rule-4-deductions-and-the-bookmakers?post_id=550804539#550804539</link><description>No bookmaker ever mentions the tickets that are never reclaimed on late nons/withdrawn horses.  So are we to assume all stakes are always reclaimed?I'm struggling with that proposal, particularly in the sort of circumstances that prevailed at Chelten</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 11:49:23 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I fly to san Francisco tomorrow ribero1.put me down as an absentee</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30776631/rule-4-deductions-and-the-bookmakers?post_id=550804325#550804325</link><description>I fly to san Francisco tomorrow ribero1.put me down as an absentee</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 11:03:03 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Yes the non runner deductions on here are perfectly fair on a 100% book. I wonder what kind of percentge books a Cheltenham courtyard bookie would open with on say a 12 runner h/cap?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30776631/rule-4-deductions-and-the-bookmakers?post_id=550804133#550804133</link><description>Yes the non runner deductions on here are perfectly fair on a 100% book. I wonder what kind of percentge books a Cheltenham courtyard bookie would open with on say a 12 runner h/cap?</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:15:14 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>onthejim    05 Jan 17 15:50  When the bleeding hearts get the equivalent of the reduction factors on here, I assume they will all be happy!They might be in a 101% market.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30776631/rule-4-deductions-and-the-bookmakers?post_id=550804011#550804011</link><description>onthejim    05 Jan 17 15:50  When the bleeding hearts get the equivalent of the reduction factors on here, I assume they will all be happy!They might be in a 101% market.</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 09:52:48 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>When the bleeding hearts get the equivalent of the reduction factors on here, I assume they will all be happy!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30776631/rule-4-deductions-and-the-bookmakers?post_id=550804005#550804005</link><description>When the bleeding hearts get the equivalent of the reduction factors on here, I assume they will all be happy!</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 09:50:58 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>He will have been there Adge,has a share in Lil Rockerfeller.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30776631/rule-4-deductions-and-the-bookmakers?post_id=550803787#550803787</link><description>He will have been there Adge,has a share in Lil Rockerfeller.</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 09:07:28 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>The racing post fannies around big issues as they all enjoy the gravy train so much race course bookmakers are off no use to them so they a nice easy target I can not be arsed answering mmmluskas question but my guess adge is you don't impose a 5p de</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30776631/rule-4-deductions-and-the-bookmakers?post_id=550803749#550803749</link><description>The racing post fannies around big issues as they all enjoy the gravy train so much race course bookmakers are off no use to them so they a nice easy target I can not be arsed answering mmmluskas question but my guess adge is you don't impose a 5p de</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 09:02:47 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
