<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: &Acirc;&pound;60,000 @1.01 and layers cannot win</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30659825/60000-101-and-layers-cannot-win</link><description></description><item><title>btw does anyone know the origin of "if you can't win, you can't lose".  It is often quoted, but I can't find any basis for it. Bruce Forsyth</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30659825/60000-101-and-layers-cannot-win?post_id=547962629#547962629</link><description>btw does anyone know the origin of "if you can't win, you can't lose".  It is often quoted, but I can't find any basis for it. Bruce Forsyth</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 08:30:13 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I agree with you connor.  It is merely the definition of a bet ie anyone offering such bets is subject to the relevant law eg bookies cartoon racing.  I vaguely remember though that the Gambling Commission sides with longbridge, so I suppose that is</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30659825/60000-101-and-layers-cannot-win?post_id=547962579#547962579</link><description>I agree with you connor.  It is merely the definition of a bet ie anyone offering such bets is subject to the relevant law eg bookies cartoon racing.  I vaguely remember though that the Gambling Commission sides with longbridge, so I suppose that is</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 08:23:15 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>the concept of can't win can't lose is a bookmaker custom but it's not enshrined in law. I could back every horse in the national so that I only get back &Acirc;&pound;65 for my &Acirc;&pound;100 but the bookie won't void my bets, or back two even money shots in a three hor</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30659825/60000-101-and-layers-cannot-win?post_id=547962371#547962371</link><description>the concept of can't win can't lose is a bookmaker custom but it's not enshrined in law. I could back every horse in the national so that I only get back &Acirc;&pound;65 for my &Acirc;&pound;100 but the bookie won't void my bets, or back two even money shots in a three hor</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 07:59:44 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>in other words there is no return price on a 1/2 dead heat because you lose every time.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30659825/60000-101-and-layers-cannot-win?post_id=547962363#547962363</link><description>in other words there is no return price on a 1/2 dead heat because you lose every time.</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 07:58:56 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>let me confuse the issue a little more,A punter rings his bookmaker and says he wants to win 50 quid on a 1/2 shot in the first race.the bookie says he is not giving morning prices on that race.So the punter says ,ok when the race is over I will pay</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30659825/60000-101-and-layers-cannot-win?post_id=547962235#547962235</link><description>let me confuse the issue a little more,A punter rings his bookmaker and says he wants to win 50 quid on a 1/2 shot in the first race.the bookie says he is not giving morning prices on that race.So the punter says ,ok when the race is over I will pay</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 07:45:32 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Longbridge, I must admit I replied to your posting to see if someone else would join in and clarify the position.Fortunately, or unfortunately depending on how you see it, I'm not a lawyer either....I've often wondered about the legal position of the</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30659825/60000-101-and-layers-cannot-win?post_id=547962163#547962163</link><description>Longbridge, I must admit I replied to your posting to see if someone else would join in and clarify the position.Fortunately, or unfortunately depending on how you see it, I'm not a lawyer either....I've often wondered about the legal position of the</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 07:34:58 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>connor, we clearly have different readings of the Act and as I'm not a lawyer I'm not going to pretend mine is better; which isn't to say I'm convinced by yours.Someone will doubtless be along shortly who has professional insight into this area.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30659825/60000-101-and-layers-cannot-win?post_id=547961849#547961849</link><description>connor, we clearly have different readings of the Act and as I'm not a lawyer I'm not going to pretend mine is better; which isn't to say I'm convinced by yours.Someone will doubtless be along shortly who has professional insight into this area.</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 06:44:23 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Longbridge, 2a/b and 3 a/b just state what a transaction relating to betting is, they don't say whether a bet is valid or not.In the context of the act, the important part is the very first section 1b.....fair and open...of course some people feel ev</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30659825/60000-101-and-layers-cannot-win?post_id=547961769#547961769</link><description>Longbridge, 2a/b and 3 a/b just state what a transaction relating to betting is, they don't say whether a bet is valid or not.In the context of the act, the important part is the very first section 1b.....fair and open...of course some people feel ev</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 06:28:37 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Exactly that - 2 a/b and 3 a/b tell me I can take bets on (eg) a football match that was played this morning and where I know the result - and you don't."the principle of if you cannot win, you cannot lose" is, as far as I can tell, a myth.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30659825/60000-101-and-layers-cannot-win?post_id=547961687#547961687</link><description>Exactly that - 2 a/b and 3 a/b tell me I can take bets on (eg) a football match that was played this morning and where I know the result - and you don't."the principle of if you cannot win, you cannot lose" is, as far as I can tell, a myth.</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 06:12:02 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Longbridge,When you reference the Gambling act 2005, are you referring to section 9 or is a bet defined somewere else in that act? I'd argue that that section just defines what betting is - it doesn't state that this is a valid bet or not and would g</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30659825/60000-101-and-layers-cannot-win?post_id=547961629#547961629</link><description>Longbridge,When you reference the Gambling act 2005, are you referring to section 9 or is a bet defined somewere else in that act? I'd argue that that section just defines what betting is - it doesn't state that this is a valid bet or not and would g</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 06:00:38 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
