<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Stewards York</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30572737/stewards-york</link><description>stands imo</description><item><title>the 2nd lost as much ground veering across track as winner..it DID not cost the 2nd the race.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30572737/stewards-york?post_id=545910955#545910955</link><description>the 2nd lost as much ground veering across track as winner..it DID not cost the 2nd the race.</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:40:11 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Another thing re this 'if it's over a head you won't get it' idea. So if you get a bad bump and lose a head you get it. But if you get a bump that costs you half a length, the distance you lose by, tough luck? Ludicrous.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30572737/stewards-york?post_id=545910913#545910913</link><description>Another thing re this 'if it's over a head you won't get it' idea. So if you get a bad bump and lose a head you get it. But if you get a bump that costs you half a length, the distance you lose by, tough luck? Ludicrous.</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:36:53 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The pocket talkers should stick to US racing where their horse will always get the race in the stewards room.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30572737/stewards-york?post_id=545910887#545910887</link><description>The pocket talkers should stick to US racing where their horse will always get the race in the stewards room.</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:34:13 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>If that was a handicap or maiden on a normal Wednesday he would've straightened the horse and lost the race and not care. An utter cretin.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30572737/stewards-york?post_id=545910873#545910873</link><description>If that was a handicap or maiden on a normal Wednesday he would've straightened the horse and lost the race and not care. An utter cretin.</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:33:22 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I think that result would have stood even under the old rules. The 2nd was heading across diagonally of his own accord. They raced on parallel lines, across the track, until the wunner bumped him, but it made little or no difference. If Joseph had ha</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30572737/stewards-york?post_id=545910867#545910867</link><description>I think that result would have stood even under the old rules. The 2nd was heading across diagonally of his own accord. They raced on parallel lines, across the track, until the wunner bumped him, but it made little or no difference. If Joseph had ha</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:33:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Thought Cosgrave came over as very dislikable in the enquiry</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30572737/stewards-york?post_id=545910853#545910853</link><description>Thought Cosgrave came over as very dislikable in the enquiry</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:31:03 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>It's all too silly for words. Imagine if international athletes and swimmers the world over were told that when you come to England there won't be lanes.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30572737/stewards-york?post_id=545910847#545910847</link><description>It's all too silly for words. Imagine if international athletes and swimmers the world over were told that when you come to England there won't be lanes.</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:30:35 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>So why say possible interference when they already knew there was interference. Twice.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30572737/stewards-york?post_id=545910841#545910841</link><description>So why say possible interference when they already knew there was interference. Twice.</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:30:22 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>yes ..twice</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30572737/stewards-york?post_id=545910811#545910811</link><description>yes ..twice</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:27:21 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Once you heard the words 'possible interference' from the stewards you knew the whole thing would be a farce. Did they not watch the race?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30572737/stewards-york?post_id=545910803#545910803</link><description>Once you heard the words 'possible interference' from the stewards you knew the whole thing would be a farce. Did they not watch the race?</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:26:51 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
