<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Jack Hobbs 1.9 for &acirc;&#x82;&not;1111</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30533517/jack-hobbs-19-for-1111</link><description>If anyone is interested that will be available for next 15 minutes.</description><item><title>screaming from beneaththewaves 27 Jun 15 18:40 Joined: 30 Jan 05 | Topic/replies: 7,918 | Blogger: screaming from beneaththewaves's blog2015-06-2517:27    IRE Curr 27th Jun / 18:30 1m4f Grp1 / Jack Hobbs Back         1.90    106.75    Won         96.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30533517/jack-hobbs-19-for-1111?post_id=545310417#545310417</link><description>screaming from beneaththewaves 27 Jun 15 18:40 Joined: 30 Jan 05 | Topic/replies: 7,918 | Blogger: screaming from beneaththewaves's blog2015-06-2517:27    IRE Curr 27th Jun / 18:30 1m4f Grp1 / Jack Hobbs Back         1.90    106.75    Won         96.</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2015 17:40:50 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I understand perfectly well thanks.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30533517/jack-hobbs-19-for-1111?post_id=545310393#545310393</link><description>I understand perfectly well thanks.</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2015 17:39:09 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>That's complete nonsense, beating the SP over a significant sample size is an indication of obtaining value,on an individual event when the winner wins doing handstands,it clearly isn't a value lay with the benefit of hindsight......Continuously beat</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30533517/jack-hobbs-19-for-1111?post_id=545310385#545310385</link><description>That's complete nonsense, beating the SP over a significant sample size is an indication of obtaining value,on an individual event when the winner wins doing handstands,it clearly isn't a value lay with the benefit of hindsight......Continuously beat</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2015 17:38:42 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>This line is complete nonsense,the market in an individual event can not in any manner be taking as verification of an opinion. There are many races where the BSP is a distance away from their actual probability but on average if you beat the BSP ove</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30533517/jack-hobbs-19-for-1111?post_id=545310381#545310381</link><description>This line is complete nonsense,the market in an individual event can not in any manner be taking as verification of an opinion. There are many races where the BSP is a distance away from their actual probability but on average if you beat the BSP ove</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2015 17:38:27 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>You don't understand betting,markets or probability but best of luck in your future endeavours.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30533517/jack-hobbs-19-for-1111?post_id=545310311#545310311</link><description>You don't understand betting,markets or probability but best of luck in your future endeavours.</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2015 17:32:43 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Einstein once said that an intelligent man can explain difficult concepts simply. You seem to be seeking to turn simple concepts into impenetrable nonsense. Thankfully I have an eye for such things. Firstly, they weren't minimal fluctuations. He put</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30533517/jack-hobbs-19-for-1111?post_id=545310277#545310277</link><description>Einstein once said that an intelligent man can explain difficult concepts simply. You seem to be seeking to turn simple concepts into impenetrable nonsense. Thankfully I have an eye for such things. Firstly, they weren't minimal fluctuations. He put</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2015 17:30:11 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>"you don't come any closer in any individual race to objectivity than the weight of money from the market even allowing for sample size."This line is complete nonsense,the market in an individual event can not in any manner be taking as verification</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30533517/jack-hobbs-19-for-1111?post_id=545310275#545310275</link><description>"you don't come any closer in any individual race to objectivity than the weight of money from the market even allowing for sample size."This line is complete nonsense,the market in an individual event can not in any manner be taking as verification</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2015 17:29:41 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Minimal fluctuations in the market shouldn't be seen as a verification of an opinion, there is an ocean of a gap for me in the differential between a back and a lay as there is a world of alternatives.Many of the criteria that in your opinion should</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30533517/jack-hobbs-19-for-1111?post_id=545310169#545310169</link><description>Minimal fluctuations in the market shouldn't be seen as a verification of an opinion, there is an ocean of a gap for me in the differential between a back and a lay as there is a world of alternatives.Many of the criteria that in your opinion should</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2015 17:16:13 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I wouldn't go so far as to return the comment but surely you see the illogicality of applying post event rationalising and using it as evidence for what was happening prior to the event? We know what Jack Hobbs did. We didn't know what he was going t</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30533517/jack-hobbs-19-for-1111?post_id=545310099#545310099</link><description>I wouldn't go so far as to return the comment but surely you see the illogicality of applying post event rationalising and using it as evidence for what was happening prior to the event? We know what Jack Hobbs did. We didn't know what he was going t</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2015 17:06:42 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>^^^^ That's complete nonsense, beating the SP over a significant sample size is an indication of obtaining value,on an individual event when the winner wins doing handstands,it clearly isn't a value lay with the benefit of hindsight.Also one can't wa</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30533517/jack-hobbs-19-for-1111?post_id=545309971#545309971</link><description>^^^^ That's complete nonsense, beating the SP over a significant sample size is an indication of obtaining value,on an individual event when the winner wins doing handstands,it clearly isn't a value lay with the benefit of hindsight.Also one can't wa</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2015 16:49:12 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
