<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Student wins &Acirc;&pound;1,000 from 50p bet</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30514585/student-wins-1000-from-50p-bet</link><description>Julius Ndlovu's win was turned down by William Hill, who said they 'calculated the odds wrongly' on the online tennis betA student nurse won &Acirc;&pound;1,000 from a 50p bet on tennis ace Roger Federer - only for William Hill to refuse the pay-out, claiming th</description><item><title>jamesdean there are numerous cases of white goods being offered online and apparently bought at ludicrous prices, none of the contracts has ever been deemed enforceable.  Bookmakers are no different.The area worth fighting about is a bookmakers error</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30514585/student-wins-1000-from-50p-bet?post_id=544987637#544987637</link><description>jamesdean there are numerous cases of white goods being offered online and apparently bought at ludicrous prices, none of the contracts has ever been deemed enforceable.  Bookmakers are no different.The area worth fighting about is a bookmakers error</description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 09:24:44 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Sure you do. Consumer rights/protection act Every bet placed is in essence a product bought. You're buying into a contract with the bookmaker.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30514585/student-wins-1000-from-50p-bet?post_id=544987015#544987015</link><description>Sure you do. Consumer rights/protection act Every bet placed is in essence a product bought. You're buying into a contract with the bookmaker.</description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 08:53:05 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>you have no legally enforceable t&amp;c'sHTH</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30514585/student-wins-1000-from-50p-bet?post_id=544986933#544986933</link><description>you have no legally enforceable t&amp;c'sHTH</description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 08:48:14 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Shouldn't it be a two street though.I've made loads of palpable errors down the years...how come I don't get my money back from the bookies.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30514585/student-wins-1000-from-50p-bet?post_id=544986897#544986897</link><description>Shouldn't it be a two street though.I've made loads of palpable errors down the years...how come I don't get my money back from the bookies.</description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 08:46:43 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>palpable error = a basically obvious error.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30514585/student-wins-1000-from-50p-bet?post_id=544986477#544986477</link><description>palpable error = a basically obvious error.</description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 08:21:15 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Don't think anyone on here is disputing the fact that it was clearly a palpable error.The discussion is still going on because people are rightly saying there should be measures put in to ensure it doesn't happen. The technology is there to stop it.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30514585/student-wins-1000-from-50p-bet?post_id=544986363#544986363</link><description>Don't think anyone on here is disputing the fact that it was clearly a palpable error.The discussion is still going on because people are rightly saying there should be measures put in to ensure it doesn't happen. The technology is there to stop it.</description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 08:12:04 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Issue fundamentally surely is what constitutes a "palpable error". Undefined the words are capable of differing interpretations and therefore a recipe for dispute. The whole rule as currently constructed is unfair,unclear and ambiguous. A bit like "r</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30514585/student-wins-1000-from-50p-bet?post_id=544985281#544985281</link><description>Issue fundamentally surely is what constitutes a "palpable error". Undefined the words are capable of differing interpretations and therefore a recipe for dispute. The whole rule as currently constructed is unfair,unclear and ambiguous. A bit like "r</description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 06:36:46 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>roida - of course it was a cover up, it was a BF bot gone wrong (very badly). I would imagine a few got paid some sort of compo after taking it as far as possible without it hitting the courts. I would love to have seen them giving out the account de</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30514585/student-wins-1000-from-50p-bet?post_id=544985123#544985123</link><description>roida - of course it was a cover up, it was a BF bot gone wrong (very badly). I would imagine a few got paid some sort of compo after taking it as far as possible without it hitting the courts. I would love to have seen them giving out the account de</description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 06:12:20 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The VLV scenario was a cover up without doubt...In over 10 yrs ive never known anyone place a bet that exceeded their exposure limit.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30514585/student-wins-1000-from-50p-bet?post_id=544984921#544984921</link><description>The VLV scenario was a cover up without doubt...In over 10 yrs ive never known anyone place a bet that exceeded their exposure limit.</description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 05:33:51 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Turning down the &Acirc;&pound;100 free bets does, I suppose, strengthen his claim to be an innocent punter who believed Hills odds, rather than a shark trying it on.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30514585/student-wins-1000-from-50p-bet?post_id=544984851#544984851</link><description>Turning down the &Acirc;&pound;100 free bets does, I suppose, strengthen his claim to be an innocent punter who believed Hills odds, rather than a shark trying it on.</description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 05:22:57 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
