<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: How is this NOT a Dead Heat? See Photos</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30506617/how-is-this-not-a-dead-heat-see-photos</link><description>Goodwood 3:55 23/05/15 - Green with Red hat wins 1st (3)  9 Enlace M Johnston 3 8-0 N Mackay 12/1 Tracking leaders when left in lead over 4f out, edging left from 2f out, ridden and pressed when hung left inside final furlong, just held on opened 16/</description><item><title>Taking Einsteins theory into account : Time is relative to speed and distance. If the photo technology worked at the speed of light - then a pixel difference might be correct - but what we see is a time sliced photo that does not work at the speed of</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30506617/how-is-this-not-a-dead-heat-see-photos?post_id=544874063#544874063</link><description>Taking Einsteins theory into account : Time is relative to speed and distance. If the photo technology worked at the speed of light - then a pixel difference might be correct - but what we see is a time sliced photo that does not work at the speed of</description><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 08:29:24 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>^ Agree - sugarfoot -  - and as  I posted on Page 1 - most especially given that - at the other end, the Start - the 'Luck of the DRAW' for Stalls positions is entirely RandomFor example - In a race where Low Numbers are undeniably favoured -If a hor</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30506617/how-is-this-not-a-dead-heat-see-photos?post_id=544873889#544873889</link><description>^ Agree - sugarfoot -  - and as  I posted on Page 1 - most especially given that - at the other end, the Start - the 'Luck of the DRAW' for Stalls positions is entirely RandomFor example - In a race where Low Numbers are undeniably favoured -If a hor</description><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 08:15:05 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>thx onlooker, forgot all about that.But surely it makes sense, when no gap between horses can reasonably be identified just to call a dead-heat? That way owners, jockeys, trainers and punters can all go home reasonably happy. dead heats are much more</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30506617/how-is-this-not-a-dead-heat-see-photos?post_id=544873813#544873813</link><description>thx onlooker, forgot all about that.But surely it makes sense, when no gap between horses can reasonably be identified just to call a dead-heat? That way owners, jockeys, trainers and punters can all go home reasonably happy. dead heats are much more</description><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 08:06:54 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>http://media.britishhorseracing.com/images/photofinish/hireswatermark/2015_18012_0.jpgop's images make it look dh, but this one on the bha site shows a clear pixel gap to the nose of the second that you don't see in the blurred one</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30506617/how-is-this-not-a-dead-heat-see-photos?post_id=544873787#544873787</link><description>http://media.britishhorseracing.com/images/photofinish/hireswatermark/2015_18012_0.jpgop's images make it look dh, but this one on the bha site shows a clear pixel gap to the nose of the second that you don't see in the blurred one</description><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 08:03:42 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Dave Smith should have been effing shot for that Kempton call.Betvictor refused to  pay out on the 'real' winner whereas most of the other bookmakers did the honourable thing.You can guess who I backed it with ! Thought about taking Smith to court bu</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30506617/how-is-this-not-a-dead-heat-see-photos?post_id=544872901#544872901</link><description>Dave Smith should have been effing shot for that Kempton call.Betvictor refused to  pay out on the 'real' winner whereas most of the other bookmakers did the honourable thing.You can guess who I backed it with ! Thought about taking Smith to court bu</description><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 06:45:11 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>love a conspiracy , enlace won fair and square.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30506617/how-is-this-not-a-dead-heat-see-photos?post_id=544869933#544869933</link><description>love a conspiracy , enlace won fair and square.</description><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2015 19:01:33 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Here's Dave Smith's sacking photos from a few years ago (purely to add a bit of interest)</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30506617/how-is-this-not-a-dead-heat-see-photos?post_id=544869447#544869447</link><description>Here's Dave Smith's sacking photos from a few years ago (purely to add a bit of interest)</description><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2015 17:42:37 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>All comes down to what is deemed reasonable.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30506617/how-is-this-not-a-dead-heat-see-photos?post_id=544868633#544868633</link><description>All comes down to what is deemed reasonable.</description><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2015 16:27:43 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>thx onlooker, forgot all about that.But surely it makes sense, when no gap between horses can reasonably be identified just to call a dead-heat? That way owners, jockeys, trainers and punters can all go home reasonably happy.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30506617/how-is-this-not-a-dead-heat-see-photos?post_id=544868557#544868557</link><description>thx onlooker, forgot all about that.But surely it makes sense, when no gap between horses can reasonably be identified just to call a dead-heat? That way owners, jockeys, trainers and punters can all go home reasonably happy.</description><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2015 16:21:21 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Tiptheodds -We have already had that - a couple of years ago - with Neptune Coolonges  &Acirc;&laquo;     1         Neptune Collonges (FR) 33/1     11     11-6      Paul Nicholls     157     164     169     &acirc;&#x80;&#x94;         Daryl Jacob      Mid-division, headway 17th</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30506617/how-is-this-not-a-dead-heat-see-photos?post_id=544867157#544867157</link><description>Tiptheodds -We have already had that - a couple of years ago - with Neptune Coolonges  &Acirc;&laquo;     1         Neptune Collonges (FR) 33/1     11     11-6      Paul Nicholls     157     164     169     &acirc;&#x80;&#x94;         Daryl Jacob      Mid-division, headway 17th</description><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2015 14:43:13 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
