<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Typical Ch 4 coverage</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30492705/typical-ch-4-coverage</link><description>We could be watching the runners in the parade ring. Instead we get a repeat of an interview.</description><item><title>hmmm Cunningham or Zoey or Ozzie Gin or Darrell Williams or Thommo.....Unleash Chapman on the masses, McCririck he thankfully isn't but they need an abrasive character as they are all the same. No discord, no arguing ffs punting is all about discord</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30492705/typical-ch-4-coverage?post_id=544636773#544636773</link><description>hmmm Cunningham or Zoey or Ozzie Gin or Darrell Williams or Thommo.....Unleash Chapman on the masses, McCririck he thankfully isn't but they need an abrasive character as they are all the same. No discord, no arguing ffs punting is all about discord</description><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 04:47:01 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>have to admit that i could listen to halifax jim, cunni and nick luck all day long when they get together on C4get a bit miffed when that trio gets interrupted</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30492705/typical-ch-4-coverage?post_id=544636765#544636765</link><description>have to admit that i could listen to halifax jim, cunni and nick luck all day long when they get together on C4get a bit miffed when that trio gets interrupted</description><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 04:46:16 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Sports pundits should never be former particpants. Ex jockeys, ex footballers are virtually all useless. Cunningham is ok but needs rid of Fitz.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30492705/typical-ch-4-coverage?post_id=544636665#544636665</link><description>Sports pundits should never be former particpants. Ex jockeys, ex footballers are virtually all useless. Cunningham is ok but needs rid of Fitz.</description><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 04:37:33 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Fitz and cunningham are the worst ever duo on channel 4 EVER MICK FITZ KNOWS naf all -  but folk at home will follow him</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30492705/typical-ch-4-coverage?post_id=544625637#544625637</link><description>Fitz and cunningham are the worst ever duo on channel 4 EVER MICK FITZ KNOWS naf all -  but folk at home will follow him</description><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 12:56:44 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Let's be honest - Fitz - Cunningham - ramsden - and smug luck ARE DIRE . I HATE CHANNEL 4 - wouldn't watch it if had no RUK A HORRIBLE PROGRAMME IS HAS BECOME . You would learn more off a somebody who knew nothing about racing .</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30492705/typical-ch-4-coverage?post_id=544625401#544625401</link><description>Let's be honest - Fitz - Cunningham - ramsden - and smug luck ARE DIRE . I HATE CHANNEL 4 - wouldn't watch it if had no RUK A HORRIBLE PROGRAMME IS HAS BECOME . You would learn more off a somebody who knew nothing about racing .</description><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 12:42:06 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Emma not comfortable hogging the camera with somebody wearing more make up than herself. Less is more?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30492705/typical-ch-4-coverage?post_id=544622371#544622371</link><description>Emma not comfortable hogging the camera with somebody wearing more make up than herself. Less is more?</description><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 09:37:24 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Here we go again.Oh and of course the fashions also take precedence over the horses.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30492705/typical-ch-4-coverage?post_id=544622351#544622351</link><description>Here we go again.Oh and of course the fashions also take precedence over the horses.</description><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 09:36:19 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>We could be watching the runners in the parade ring. Instead we get a repeat of an interview.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30492705/typical-ch-4-coverage?post_id=544621777#544621777</link><description>We could be watching the runners in the parade ring. Instead we get a repeat of an interview.</description><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 09:00:20 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
