<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: My Problem With Arkle</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30223207/my-problem-with-arkle</link><description>...is Flyingbolt.2 abnormally exceptional horses against any standard before and after from the same trainer and time period?</description><item><title>A few years ago my horse was shod (not very well) by Mill House's farrier , he also mentioned he shod Arkle one day at Newbury when he lost a shoe . But one thing he also said was that Fulke Walwyn was a broken man when A beat MH for the first time ,</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30223207/my-problem-with-arkle?post_id=538524021#538524021</link><description>A few years ago my horse was shod (not very well) by Mill House's farrier , he also mentioned he shod Arkle one day at Newbury when he lost a shoe . But one thing he also said was that Fulke Walwyn was a broken man when A beat MH for the first time ,</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:53:52 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Plus my main problem, as stated in my initial posting is with Flyingbolt. Even if the Arkle situation was absolutely true, what are the chances that Flyingbolt was just 2lbs behind and still about 25lbs and more better than everything else then and s</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30223207/my-problem-with-arkle?post_id=538523065#538523065</link><description>Plus my main problem, as stated in my initial posting is with Flyingbolt. Even if the Arkle situation was absolutely true, what are the chances that Flyingbolt was just 2lbs behind and still about 25lbs and more better than everything else then and s</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:56:27 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>As the original poster, I want to apologise for seemingly disappearing from the thread but I work all week and don't have the time to visit the forum until the weekend.The thread has turned into a cracking read, especially the contributions from thos</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30223207/my-problem-with-arkle?post_id=538522961#538522961</link><description>As the original poster, I want to apologise for seemingly disappearing from the thread but I work all week and don't have the time to visit the forum until the weekend.The thread has turned into a cracking read, especially the contributions from thos</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:47:36 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Arkle was not pampered, the likes of Best Mate, didn&acirc;&#x80;&#x99;t run a lot, Kauto swerved the handicaps, he took it all and ran often, it was the handicapper that killed him.http://www.arkle.org/#!arkle/cwyq</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30223207/my-problem-with-arkle?post_id=538510363#538510363</link><description>Arkle was not pampered, the likes of Best Mate, didn&acirc;&#x80;&#x99;t run a lot, Kauto swerved the handicaps, he took it all and ran often, it was the handicapper that killed him.http://www.arkle.org/#!arkle/cwyq</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 16:41:40 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Boxers aren't heavier,except for heavyweights. Or they shouldn't be but for the jiggery-pokery that goes on in the weigh-in.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30223207/my-problem-with-arkle?post_id=538476231#538476231</link><description>Boxers aren't heavier,except for heavyweights. Or they shouldn't be but for the jiggery-pokery that goes on in the weigh-in.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2014 17:11:36 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The point I was making about the 100m times was to point out how little fundamental human performance has improved over the years. Its hardly changed at all because as some have pointed out its technology, tracks etc. I think its probably the same wi</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30223207/my-problem-with-arkle?post_id=538475283#538475283</link><description>The point I was making about the 100m times was to point out how little fundamental human performance has improved over the years. Its hardly changed at all because as some have pointed out its technology, tracks etc. I think its probably the same wi</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:25:56 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>perfectly acceptable to assume that training methods, horses diet etc have improved significantly in the 40 years as have those in other athletic discipline. Also from a welfare point of view less owners view it as acceptable to force a horse to punt</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30223207/my-problem-with-arkle?post_id=538473741#538473741</link><description>perfectly acceptable to assume that training methods, horses diet etc have improved significantly in the 40 years as have those in other athletic discipline. Also from a welfare point of view less owners view it as acceptable to force a horse to punt</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2014 15:00:32 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I think you will find the decreases in the world 100 metres times is as much a result of technology as anything else. The newly laid tracks are much faster than in previous era.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30223207/my-problem-with-arkle?post_id=538473301#538473301</link><description>I think you will find the decreases in the world 100 metres times is as much a result of technology as anything else. The newly laid tracks are much faster than in previous era.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2014 14:28:15 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Mill House was 17 hands and a bit Arkle was comfortably over 16 hands.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30223207/my-problem-with-arkle?post_id=538473189#538473189</link><description>Mill House was 17 hands and a bit Arkle was comfortably over 16 hands.</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2014 14:19:21 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>engineer     18 Mar 14 10:54  '..........  For example look up when the first sub 10 sec 100m was run. the record now is about 9.6 so its gone down 0.1 sec about every 10 years. Its no that there won't be another Arkle its just that we have not seen</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30223207/my-problem-with-arkle?post_id=538472771#538472771</link><description>engineer     18 Mar 14 10:54  '..........  For example look up when the first sub 10 sec 100m was run. the record now is about 9.6 so its gone down 0.1 sec about every 10 years. Its no that there won't be another Arkle its just that we have not seen</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2014 13:49:54 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
