New Posts For Thread: Stewards Wolveshttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30161131/stewards-wolvesWinner gets chucked imhoThe Stewards held an enquiry under Rule (B)11.6 into possible interference inside the final half furlong. Having heard their evidence and viewed recordings of the race they found that the winner, TRINITYELITEDOTCOM (IRE), ridden by Richard Kingscote,https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30161131/stewards-wolves?post_id=537016123#537016123The Stewards held an enquiry under Rule (B)11.6 into possible interference inside the final half furlong. Having heard their evidence and viewed recordings of the race they found that the winner, TRINITYELITEDOTCOM (IRE), ridden by Richard Kingscote,Sat, 21 Dec 2013 04:29:20 -0600There'll always be interference unless you get horses to run in lanes.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30161131/stewards-wolves?post_id=537008829#537008829There'll always be interference unless you get horses to run in lanes.Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:35:12 -0600if there wasinterference then result should have been reversedhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30161131/stewards-wolves?post_id=537008773#537008773if there wasinterference then result should have been reversedFri, 20 Dec 2013 14:32:23 -0600why have stewards at all.they never do anythinghttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30161131/stewards-wolves?post_id=537008603#537008603why have stewards at all.they never do anythingFri, 20 Dec 2013 14:25:24 -0600There was interference but not enough for the winner to get chucked. I'm sure the bha site will say as much later.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30161131/stewards-wolves?post_id=537005847#537005847There was interference but not enough for the winner to get chucked. I'm sure the bha site will say as much later.Fri, 20 Dec 2013 11:18:04 -0600There clearly washttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30161131/stewards-wolves?post_id=537005833#537005833There clearly wasFri, 20 Dec 2013 11:17:03 -0600there was no interferencehttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30161131/stewards-wolves?post_id=537005823#537005823there was no interferenceFri, 20 Dec 2013 11:16:07 -0600Since when do they change a result on that criteria. A ban will be imposed and that is that.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30161131/stewards-wolves?post_id=537005817#537005817Since when do they change a result on that criteria. A ban will be imposed and that is that.Fri, 20 Dec 2013 11:15:12 -0600About the only thing I usually get right, UK stewards.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30161131/stewards-wolves?post_id=537005811#537005811About the only thing I usually get right, UK stewards.Fri, 20 Dec 2013 11:15:01 -0600backed the winner at 1-2 after race best bet ever that was never going to be reversed jockey will get a day banhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30161131/stewards-wolves?post_id=537005807#537005807backed the winner at 1-2 after race best bet ever that was never going to be reversed jockey will get a day banFri, 20 Dec 2013 11:14:41 -0600