<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Stewards - this might be interesting</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30134203/stewards---this-might-be-interesting</link><description>imvho</description><item><title>Completely agree boyce.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30134203/stewards---this-might-be-interesting?post_id=536443005#536443005</link><description>Completely agree boyce.</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:43:05 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I agree in a way.But the betting was only 1.5 vs 2.5 (strangely)Seen dozens of bigger prices win Stewards over the years.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30134203/stewards---this-might-be-interesting?post_id=536442899#536442899</link><description>I agree in a way.But the betting was only 1.5 vs 2.5 (strangely)Seen dozens of bigger prices win Stewards over the years.</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:35:51 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>worst decision ive ever seen,,surely an ivestigation is warranted,,that is just blatant robbery</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30134203/stewards---this-might-be-interesting?post_id=536442721#536442721</link><description>worst decision ive ever seen,,surely an ivestigation is warranted,,that is just blatant robbery</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:25:21 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>How hard does everyome think the Jockey protested against the well backed trainers mount imo</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30134203/stewards---this-might-be-interesting?post_id=536441531#536441531</link><description>How hard does everyome think the Jockey protested against the well backed trainers mount imo</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 09:10:15 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Just seen the race for the first time.That really was an horrendously bad decision.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30134203/stewards---this-might-be-interesting?post_id=536441449#536441449</link><description>Just seen the race for the first time.That really was an horrendously bad decision.</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 09:05:21 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>that race just there the fav interfered with the 3rd twice</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30134203/stewards---this-might-be-interesting?post_id=536441049#536441049</link><description>that race just there the fav interfered with the 3rd twice</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 08:36:03 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I can't begin to think how many place positions should be amended given the precedent of this decision.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30134203/stewards---this-might-be-interesting?post_id=536440909#536440909</link><description>I can't begin to think how many place positions should be amended given the precedent of this decision.</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 08:23:52 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Still don't understand, why you have to leave a gap for a horse which is behind you?Fellow jockeys commiserate with Atzeni, saying he rode a great race</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30134203/stewards---this-might-be-interesting?post_id=536440841#536440841</link><description>Still don't understand, why you have to leave a gap for a horse which is behind you?Fellow jockeys commiserate with Atzeni, saying he rode a great race</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 08:19:36 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Interference must have been deemed accidental,metro.The intereference doesn't have to be deliberate or through careless riding for a runner to be dq'd.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30134203/stewards---this-might-be-interesting?post_id=536440573#536440573</link><description>Interference must have been deemed accidental,metro.The intereference doesn't have to be deliberate or through careless riding for a runner to be dq'd.</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 08:00:46 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>think the stewards were too influenced by the runner-up being clearly the best horse in the race, and not enough influenced by the lack of interference. the gap did close, but who decided the gap belonged to crowley? don't think he was upsides the pa</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30134203/stewards---this-might-be-interesting?post_id=536440561#536440561</link><description>think the stewards were too influenced by the runner-up being clearly the best horse in the race, and not enough influenced by the lack of interference. the gap did close, but who decided the gap belonged to crowley? don't think he was upsides the pa</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 08:00:12 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
