New Posts For Thread: Aintree Bookmakers Meetinghttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30120321/aintree-bookmakers-meetingany news pleasehttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30120321/aintree-bookmakers-meeting?post_id=536165147#536165147Sun, 27 Oct 2013 08:39:10 -0500that was sunderland who just scored jimnasthttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30120321/aintree-bookmakers-meeting?post_id=536165099#536165099that was sunderland who just scored jimnastSun, 27 Oct 2013 08:36:54 -0500do the premier league not care about those with black and white televisions ?this sunderland Newcastle game is a colour clash !https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30120321/aintree-bookmakers-meeting?post_id=536165035#536165035do the premier league not care about those with black and white televisions ?this sunderland Newcastle game is a colour clash !Sun, 27 Oct 2013 08:33:04 -0500in short JCR have sought legal opinion as to whether two or more different firms linking and thus displaying exactly the same price is legal.the legal opinion has come back that this would be a form of price fixing and could at the same time make thehttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30120321/aintree-bookmakers-meeting?post_id=536164945#536164945in short JCR have sought legal opinion as to whether two or more different firms linking and thus displaying exactly the same price is legal.the legal opinion has come back that this would be a form of price fixing and could at the same time make theSun, 27 Oct 2013 08:26:19 -0500https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30120321/aintree-bookmakers-meeting?post_id=536164905#536164905Sun, 27 Oct 2013 08:23:08 -0500the most sensible reply so farhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30120321/aintree-bookmakers-meeting?post_id=536164895#536164895the most sensible reply so farSun, 27 Oct 2013 08:22:01 -0500Regit,there has been a move to outlaw it by thr frb and the racecourses,however those who it affects most have been up in arms and taken legal advice,so it most probably wont happen,it was supposed to be due to "price fixing" that they could get it shttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30120321/aintree-bookmakers-meeting?post_id=536164871#536164871Regit,there has been a move to outlaw it by thr frb and the racecourses,however those who it affects most have been up in arms and taken legal advice,so it most probably wont happen,it was supposed to be due to "price fixing" that they could get it sSun, 27 Oct 2013 08:19:33 -0500The linking of different operators is under scrutiny by JCR and they are in discussions with the GC about this.Whether that means anything will be done is anybody's guesshttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30120321/aintree-bookmakers-meeting?post_id=536164847#536164847The linking of different operators is under scrutiny by JCR and they are in discussions with the GC about this.Whether that means anything will be done is anybody's guessSun, 27 Oct 2013 08:18:16 -0500Yes it could have been mentioned at the meeting (although I couldn't attend)If I understand correctly, then if you keep both your existing pitches then you only pay one marketing fee. Only if a pitch is sold does a second marketing fee come into plachttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30120321/aintree-bookmakers-meeting?post_id=536164833#536164833Yes it could have been mentioned at the meeting (although I couldn't attend)If I understand correctly, then if you keep both your existing pitches then you only pay one marketing fee. Only if a pitch is sold does a second marketing fee come into placSun, 27 Oct 2013 08:16:38 -0500adge whats this about linking pitches of different operators please.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/30120321/aintree-bookmakers-meeting?post_id=536164523#536164523adge whats this about linking pitches of different operators please.Sun, 27 Oct 2013 07:51:23 -0500