New Posts For Thread: James Babbs & John Celaschi Appeal Board's reasons and revised penaltieshttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29955227/james-babbs-john-celaschi-appeal-boards-reasons-and-revised-penaltiesAppeal Board's reasons and revised penalties following James Babbs and John Celaschi appeal•James Babbs and John Celaschi both disqualified for 18 months for breaches of Rules related to laying or assisting the laying of horses under their ownershiTry and prove that inside information wasn't communicated?https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29955227/james-babbs-john-celaschi-appeal-boards-reasons-and-revised-penalties?post_id=532823543#532823543Try and prove that inside information wasn't communicated?Wed, 05 Jun 2013 02:43:12 -0500[i]The Appeal Board said that if it is legal to back horses to win with the benefit of inside information, which is perfectly legal in racing, then it is no different to laying horses with the benefit of similar information, provided that informationhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29955227/james-babbs-john-celaschi-appeal-boards-reasons-and-revised-penalties?post_id=532823483#532823483[i]The Appeal Board said that if it is legal to back horses to win with the benefit of inside information, which is perfectly legal in racing, then it is no different to laying horses with the benefit of similar information, provided that informationWed, 05 Jun 2013 02:35:54 -0500to my mind the Appeal decision is correct because it tackles, in a roundabout way, the whole idea of 'backing the rest' in order to lay one. Dutching can be used to lay a horse and the rules applied by the BHA have to recognize this.Now, following thhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29955227/james-babbs-john-celaschi-appeal-boards-reasons-and-revised-penalties?post_id=532823165#532823165to my mind the Appeal decision is correct because it tackles, in a roundabout way, the whole idea of 'backing the rest' in order to lay one. Dutching can be used to lay a horse and the rules applied by the BHA have to recognize this.Now, following thWed, 05 Jun 2013 01:50:48 -0500BHA face dilemma over use of inside informationThe British Horseracing Authority have been forced to take another look at their definition of inside information after the Appeal Board came up with a fundamentally different interpretation to that undehttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29955227/james-babbs-john-celaschi-appeal-boards-reasons-and-revised-penalties?post_id=532817621#532817621BHA face dilemma over use of inside informationThe British Horseracing Authority have been forced to take another look at their definition of inside information after the Appeal Board came up with a fundamentally different interpretation to that undeTue, 04 Jun 2013 17:18:43 -0500Point 28 is quite interesting ..https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29955227/james-babbs-john-celaschi-appeal-boards-reasons-and-revised-penalties?post_id=532809177#532809177Point 28 is quite interesting ..Tue, 04 Jun 2013 11:39:36 -0500Appeal Board's reasons and revised penalties following James Babbs and John Celaschi appeal•James Babbs and John Celaschi both disqualified for 18 months for breaches of Rules related to laying or assisting the laying of horses under their ownershihttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29955227/james-babbs-john-celaschi-appeal-boards-reasons-and-revised-penalties?post_id=532807897#532807897Appeal Board's reasons and revised penalties following James Babbs and John Celaschi appeal•James Babbs and John Celaschi both disqualified for 18 months for breaches of Rules related to laying or assisting the laying of horses under their ownershiTue, 04 Jun 2013 11:00:55 -0500