<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: D-Day for Betfair Eddie</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29908787/d-day-for-betfair-eddie</link><description>The hearing is scheduled to take place on 29th April - 3rd May 2013,Please note that although the charges below specifically refer to Betting Exchange account holders, it is the BHA&acirc;&#x80;&#x99;s case that some of those account holders also used other betting</description><item><title>I agree that information is passed all the time in horseracing and it's part of the whole set up, most of it harmless (jockeys are crap judges half the time!)and there has to be common sense applied. These cases that result in charges are almost alwa</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29908787/d-day-for-betfair-eddie?post_id=531847089#531847089</link><description>I agree that information is passed all the time in horseracing and it's part of the whole set up, most of it harmless (jockeys are crap judges half the time!)and there has to be common sense applied. These cases that result in charges are almost alwa</description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 06:31:48 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>understand your point, Gary, but find it difficult to understand how if you asked any half clued up jockey, would he/she not give you an opinion on their ride, which can then be construed as positive as negative?It doesn't mean they are cheating or s</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29908787/d-day-for-betfair-eddie?post_id=531846937#531846937</link><description>understand your point, Gary, but find it difficult to understand how if you asked any half clued up jockey, would he/she not give you an opinion on their ride, which can then be construed as positive as negative?It doesn't mean they are cheating or s</description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 06:22:47 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Agree 3 is much more serious but 1 and 2 shouldn't be dismissed so easily imo. They often go for these when they're not convinced they can make charge 3 stick but are confident on 1 and 2. If someone has passed info for reward whether they charge the</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29908787/d-day-for-betfair-eddie?post_id=531846751#531846751</link><description>Agree 3 is much more serious but 1 and 2 shouldn't be dismissed so easily imo. They often go for these when they're not convinced they can make charge 3 stick but are confident on 1 and 2. If someone has passed info for reward whether they charge the</description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 06:09:26 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>you're missing 2 little important words the PB, "for reward". and i and many others care about this care</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29908787/d-day-for-betfair-eddie?post_id=531846747#531846747</link><description>you're missing 2 little important words the PB, "for reward". and i and many others care about this care</description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 06:08:57 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Found guilty already strange thing is Adam KIRBY rode the horse but is not involved in any wrongdoing24 Apr 2013 12:00 Result of a Disciplinary Panel hearing (Michael Turl)On 22nd April 2013 the Disciplinary Panel of the British Horseracing Authority</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29908787/d-day-for-betfair-eddie?post_id=531846741#531846741</link><description>Found guilty already strange thing is Adam KIRBY rode the horse but is not involved in any wrongdoing24 Apr 2013 12:00 Result of a Disciplinary Panel hearing (Michael Turl)On 22nd April 2013 the Disciplinary Panel of the British Horseracing Authority</description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 06:08:14 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>don't really care about charges 1 or 2. BHA would have to disqualify every jockey in the weighing room if they wanted to be taken seriously on so called "information". And every trainer in the land too.Only interested in 3 - was a horse run on its me</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29908787/d-day-for-betfair-eddie?post_id=531846629#531846629</link><description>don't really care about charges 1 or 2. BHA would have to disqualify every jockey in the weighing room if they wanted to be taken seriously on so called "information". And every trainer in the land too.Only interested in 3 - was a horse run on its me</description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 06:00:58 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The hearing is scheduled to take place on 29th April - 3rd May 2013,Please note that although the charges below specifically refer to Betting Exchange account holders, it is the BHA&acirc;&#x80;&#x99;s case that some of those account holders also used other betting</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29908787/d-day-for-betfair-eddie?post_id=531846453#531846453</link><description>The hearing is scheduled to take place on 29th April - 3rd May 2013,Please note that although the charges below specifically refer to Betting Exchange account holders, it is the BHA&acirc;&#x80;&#x99;s case that some of those account holders also used other betting</description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 05:47:49 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
