<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Charles Byrnes 'Solwith shouldn't have been withdrawn'</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29903829/charles-byrnes-solwith-shouldnt-have-been-withdrawn</link><description>Solwhit only had a scratch. he did not bleed and had a Clean scope. Very frustrating but Davy had no choice in the matter</description><item><title>I backed Solwhit but glad they did. Imagine the uproar against D Russell if he had run and been tailed off. Forum mongs would have been going ballistic</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29903829/charles-byrnes-solwith-shouldnt-have-been-withdrawn?post_id=531755079#531755079</link><description>I backed Solwhit but glad they did. Imagine the uproar against D Russell if he had run and been tailed off. Forum mongs would have been going ballistic</description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:07:06 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Solwhit only had a scratch. he did not bleed and had a Clean scope. Very frustrating but Davy had no choice in the matter</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29903829/charles-byrnes-solwith-shouldnt-have-been-withdrawn?post_id=531753263#531753263</link><description>Solwhit only had a scratch. he did not bleed and had a Clean scope. Very frustrating but Davy had no choice in the matter</description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 12:20:04 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
