<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Epsom hill bookmakers must bet to standard ew terms</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29778431/epsom-hill-bookmakers-must-bet-to-standard-ew-terms</link><description>Part of the licence for 2013 requires all hill bookmakers to bet to standard each way terms and bidding starts at &Acirc;&pound;200 for the majority of areas.</description><item><title>at least two bookmakers bet 1/4 1234 in the opener at Wetherby, you just have to look in the right places  . . .</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29778431/epsom-hill-bookmakers-must-bet-to-standard-ew-terms?post_id=529209353#529209353</link><description>at least two bookmakers bet 1/4 1234 in the opener at Wetherby, you just have to look in the right places  . . .</description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:24:59 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>The standard terms for a 16 runner handicap are a 1/5 not the 1/4 that they used to be</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29778431/epsom-hill-bookmakers-must-bet-to-standard-ew-terms?post_id=529203603#529203603</link><description>The standard terms for a 16 runner handicap are a 1/5 not the 1/4 that they used to be</description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:48:30 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>All Dick Turpins do not apply</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29778431/epsom-hill-bookmakers-must-bet-to-standard-ew-terms?post_id=529198765#529198765</link><description>All Dick Turpins do not apply</description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:09:26 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>After yesterday at Wetherby i'm totally in favour of this. In the opening race, a 16 runner h'cap, there wasn't a single bookmaker who went 1/4 the odds and at least 3 of them went 1/6 the odds. Needless to say i kept my money in my pocket!!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29778431/epsom-hill-bookmakers-must-bet-to-standard-ew-terms?post_id=529195755#529195755</link><description>After yesterday at Wetherby i'm totally in favour of this. In the opening race, a 16 runner h'cap, there wasn't a single bookmaker who went 1/4 the odds and at least 3 of them went 1/6 the odds. Needless to say i kept my money in my pocket!!</description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:39:06 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>whether you agree or not with the each way saga ( and I think it is very shortsighted by the books to behave as they are ) Any bookmaker that allows the racecourse to dictate to them how they WILL bet should have their licence taken from them You jus</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29778431/epsom-hill-bookmakers-must-bet-to-standard-ew-terms?post_id=529195461#529195461</link><description>whether you agree or not with the each way saga ( and I think it is very shortsighted by the books to behave as they are ) Any bookmaker that allows the racecourse to dictate to them how they WILL bet should have their licence taken from them You jus</description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:29:19 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Halcyon..... "What's been practised in the High Street for decades" is refusing to take e/w bets on the advertised terms where they "don't suit". Is that what people want ?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29778431/epsom-hill-bookmakers-must-bet-to-standard-ew-terms?post_id=529193357#529193357</link><description>Halcyon..... "What's been practised in the High Street for decades" is refusing to take e/w bets on the advertised terms where they "don't suit". Is that what people want ?</description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:17:30 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Davy its the Gambling Commission that caused this in the first place so not much chance they will admit they got it wrong</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29778431/epsom-hill-bookmakers-must-bet-to-standard-ew-terms?post_id=529192987#529192987</link><description>Davy its the Gambling Commission that caused this in the first place so not much chance they will admit they got it wrong</description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:04:33 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Im not sure I want the racecourses telling me how to trade, what next? What's to stop them saying take a minimum bet of &Acirc;&pound;1, lay up to &Acirc;&pound;1000, dont bet over round of more than 120%, where could it end. The gambling commission should deal with the ew</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29778431/epsom-hill-bookmakers-must-bet-to-standard-ew-terms?post_id=529191829#529191829</link><description>Im not sure I want the racecourses telling me how to trade, what next? What's to stop them saying take a minimum bet of &Acirc;&pound;1, lay up to &Acirc;&pound;1000, dont bet over round of more than 120%, where could it end. The gambling commission should deal with the ew</description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:28:31 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>''Standard'' as in what's been practised in the High Street for decades !</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29778431/epsom-hill-bookmakers-must-bet-to-standard-ew-terms?post_id=529191809#529191809</link><description>''Standard'' as in what's been practised in the High Street for decades !</description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:27:57 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>meant each way terms</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29778431/epsom-hill-bookmakers-must-bet-to-standard-ew-terms?post_id=529191657#529191657</link><description>meant each way terms</description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:21:54 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
