<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: how thick were thoughs jockeys...</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29606847/how-thick-were-thoughs-jockeys</link><description>The aw is so bad, i think they were all on the winner.</description><item><title>larry don his cobblers..</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29606847/how-thick-were-thoughs-jockeys?post_id=563694893#563694893</link><description>larry don his cobblers..</description><pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2023 08:56:09 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Looked a straight enough race to me with all handbrakes off</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29606847/how-thick-were-thoughs-jockeys?post_id=563694875#563694875</link><description>Looked a straight enough race to me with all handbrakes off</description><pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2023 08:50:16 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>'those'ydc</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29606847/how-thick-were-thoughs-jockeys?post_id=563694831#563694831</link><description>'those'ydc</description><pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2023 08:36:18 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>cannot see why her handicap should alter 2nd and 3rd will be only rated in the mid forties...........quite simply running too its mark of sixty was more than enough......think she will be packed of to stud now though ,being a half sister to a 2000gns</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29606847/how-thick-were-thoughs-jockeys?post_id=527598481#527598481</link><description>cannot see why her handicap should alter 2nd and 3rd will be only rated in the mid forties...........quite simply running too its mark of sixty was more than enough......think she will be packed of to stud now though ,being a half sister to a 2000gns</description><pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 08:10:20 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>mediocre contest been analysed to death by Chapman, good chance the best horse won.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29606847/how-thick-were-thoughs-jockeys?post_id=527598429#527598429</link><description>mediocre contest been analysed to death by Chapman, good chance the best horse won.</description><pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 08:07:38 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>To sum up---A true run race for a change,no slow, slow,then quicken down the hill,as normally happens.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29606847/how-thick-were-thoughs-jockeys?post_id=527598411#527598411</link><description>To sum up---A true run race for a change,no slow, slow,then quicken down the hill,as normally happens.</description><pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 08:06:44 -0600</pubDate></item><item><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29606847/how-thick-were-thoughs-jockeys?post_id=527598363#527598363</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 08:03:53 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>the fav was 30 lengths back,but that didnt win</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29606847/how-thick-were-thoughs-jockeys?post_id=527598341#527598341</link><description>the fav was 30 lengths back,but that didnt win</description><pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 08:02:17 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>You wouldn't mind taking on that winner off new mark.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29606847/how-thick-were-thoughs-jockeys?post_id=527598323#527598323</link><description>You wouldn't mind taking on that winner off new mark.</description><pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 08:01:22 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>yes i reckon if the winner was 30 lengths back would have still won.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29606847/how-thick-were-thoughs-jockeys?post_id=527598299#527598299</link><description>yes i reckon if the winner was 30 lengths back would have still won.</description><pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 08:00:18 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
