<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Photo Finishes</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29320387/photo-finishes</link><description>I have noticed a trend in the last couple of weeks where judges are calling a photo finish even where the result is relatively clearcut. For example today at Salisbury two photos were called where there was at least a head between the horses. If this</description><item><title>Hopefully, the EGOTIST'S  self-centred antics have forced the BHA to ussue a directive to that end -as we have been campaigning as such for a couple of years, now.I would not hold your breath, though - There was a quick call at Beverley yesterday.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29320387/photo-finishes?post_id=523080335#523080335</link><description>Hopefully, the EGOTIST'S  self-centred antics have forced the BHA to ussue a directive to that end -as we have been campaigning as such for a couple of years, now.I would not hold your breath, though - There was a quick call at Beverley yesterday.</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:52:11 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I have noticed a trend in the last couple of weeks where judges are calling a photo finish even where the result is relatively clearcut. For example today at Salisbury two photos were called where there was at least a head between the horses. If this</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29320387/photo-finishes?post_id=523080207#523080207</link><description>I have noticed a trend in the last couple of weeks where judges are calling a photo finish even where the result is relatively clearcut. For example today at Salisbury two photos were called where there was at least a head between the horses. If this</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:48:52 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
