<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Stewards are a disgrace</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29121251/stewards-are-a-disgrace</link><description>no bet on race - that decision stinks</description><item><title>I can't believe the official report:The Stewards held an enquiry under Rule (B)11.6 into possible interference on the run to the line. Having heard their evidence and viewed recordings of the race, they found that the winner, STAR COMMANDER, ridden b</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29121251/stewards-are-a-disgrace?post_id=519770099#519770099</link><description>I can't believe the official report:The Stewards held an enquiry under Rule (B)11.6 into possible interference on the run to the line. Having heard their evidence and viewed recordings of the race, they found that the winner, STAR COMMANDER, ridden b</description><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 05:56:20 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Was it detrimental to the runner up YES it was,was it beneficial to the winner again YES it was,the wainner carried the runner up off a true line not vice versa really should have been a no brainer whether the jockey did his best or otherwise they in</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29121251/stewards-are-a-disgrace?post_id=519766853#519766853</link><description>Was it detrimental to the runner up YES it was,was it beneficial to the winner again YES it was,the wainner carried the runner up off a true line not vice versa really should have been a no brainer whether the jockey did his best or otherwise they in</description><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 02:26:46 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I suggested it on RUK one night that where the stewards are unable to be sure that interference affected a result - and lets face it most of the time it is impossible to be 100% sure - then they should award a dead-heat. That way, nobody can complain</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29121251/stewards-are-a-disgrace?post_id=519759805#519759805</link><description>I suggested it on RUK one night that where the stewards are unable to be sure that interference affected a result - and lets face it most of the time it is impossible to be 100% sure - then they should award a dead-heat. That way, nobody can complain</description><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 18:56:03 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>saying Nicole Nordblad would definitely have got one up is...</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29121251/stewards-are-a-disgrace?post_id=519749291#519749291</link><description>saying Nicole Nordblad would definitely have got one up is...</description><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 13:06:37 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>oh look another sand skier backer</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29121251/stewards-are-a-disgrace?post_id=519749067#519749067</link><description>oh look another sand skier backer</description><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 13:00:30 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>hey Eddy...you're a fckg halfwit. Go away for a while</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29121251/stewards-are-a-disgrace?post_id=519748983#519748983</link><description>hey Eddy...you're a fckg halfwit. Go away for a while</description><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 12:58:28 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Why and what the stewards decide is always a mystery tbf, hardly consistent.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29121251/stewards-are-a-disgrace?post_id=519748005#519748005</link><description>Why and what the stewards decide is always a mystery tbf, hardly consistent.</description><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 12:32:46 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>look i ask again if it was such an obvious decision tell me why they didnt ammend the result we are just punters they get paid to be stewards so i am not the only person who thinks it didnt need to be ammended</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29121251/stewards-are-a-disgrace?post_id=519747957#519747957</link><description>look i ask again if it was such an obvious decision tell me why they didnt ammend the result we are just punters they get paid to be stewards so i am not the only person who thinks it didnt need to be ammended</description><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 12:30:42 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>It was a poor decision,2nd should have got the race. Not the first or last race the stewards have got badly wrong</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29121251/stewards-are-a-disgrace?post_id=519747899#519747899</link><description>It was a poor decision,2nd should have got the race. Not the first or last race the stewards have got badly wrong</description><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 12:29:03 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Has someone hacked Eddy's account?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29121251/stewards-are-a-disgrace?post_id=519747851#519747851</link><description>Has someone hacked Eddy's account?</description><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 12:27:51 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
