New Posts For Thread: Would Sunnyhillboy have been 1.01 without the 'issues' ?https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29061193/would-sunnyhillboy-have-been-101-without-the-issuesLooked all over the winner even a few yards from the line. Not sure it even went below 1.3.1.03 £145 1.04 £5,617 1.05 £22,283 1.06 £5,729 1.07 £2,547 1.08 £3,073 1.09 £3,219 1.10 £4,309 1.11 £13,321 1.12 £5,666 1.13 £4,428https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29061193/would-sunnyhillboy-have-been-101-without-the-issues?post_id=518608891#5186088911.03 £145 1.04 £5,617 1.05 £22,283 1.06 £5,729 1.07 £2,547 1.08 £3,073 1.09 £3,219 1.10 £4,309 1.11 £13,321 1.12 £5,666 1.13 £4,428Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:02:51 -0500It certainly weren't me laying at 1.04, I just had a look at the lows column on Timeformhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29061193/would-sunnyhillboy-have-been-101-without-the-issues?post_id=518608535#518608535It certainly weren't me laying at 1.04, I just had a look at the lows column on TimeformSat, 14 Apr 2012 11:52:52 -05001.03 was matchedhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29061193/would-sunnyhillboy-have-been-101-without-the-issues?post_id=518608511#5186085111.03 was matchedSat, 14 Apr 2012 11:52:21 -0500Cheers lads. I tried to check and I couldn't see anything below 1.3. My mistake. Must go to Specsavers. My I/R Lay of 1.0x not takenhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29061193/would-sunnyhillboy-have-been-101-without-the-issues?post_id=518608467#518608467Cheers lads. I tried to check and I couldn't see anything below 1.3. My mistake. Must go to Specsavers. My I/R Lay of 1.0x not takenSat, 14 Apr 2012 11:51:23 -0500I laid some 1.06https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29061193/would-sunnyhillboy-have-been-101-without-the-issues?post_id=518608407#518608407I laid some 1.06Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:49:17 -0500BM, that is if you believe these were authentic matches. Given the palaver i/r, I wouldn't bet on it. Not here anyway.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29061193/would-sunnyhillboy-have-been-101-without-the-issues?post_id=518608357#518608357BM, that is if you believe these were authentic matches. Given the palaver i/r, I wouldn't bet on it. Not here anyway.Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:47:49 -0500yes 1.03 was at the front of the queue to back but none got matched . 1.04 was matched thoughhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29061193/would-sunnyhillboy-have-been-101-without-the-issues?post_id=518608337#518608337yes 1.03 was at the front of the queue to back but none got matched . 1.04 was matched thoughSat, 14 Apr 2012 11:47:34 -0500Jack is correct, Low: 1.04https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29061193/would-sunnyhillboy-have-been-101-without-the-issues?post_id=518608235#518608235Jack is correct, Low: 1.04Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:45:32 -05001.03 IT HIT ON THE NOW CALLED BRIGHTER SIDE WITH A HINT OF DEEP PURPLE IN IThttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29061193/would-sunnyhillboy-have-been-101-without-the-issues?post_id=518608223#5186082231.03 IT HIT ON THE NOW CALLED BRIGHTER SIDE WITH A HINT OF DEEP PURPLE IN ITSat, 14 Apr 2012 11:45:26 -0500It went as low as 1.04https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29061193/would-sunnyhillboy-have-been-101-without-the-issues?post_id=518608127#518608127It went as low as 1.04Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:43:08 -0500