<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: RUBY WALSH SHOCKING RIDE</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28994255/ruby-walsh-shocking-ride</link><description>and ted walsh says no hard luck stories.....hello ted,he was 1olenghts back for most of the fkn race....noone on c4 has the ba lls to criticise walsh</description><item><title>Commentary was garbage. Very steady pace for a Champion Hurdle and on fairly quick ground, the leaders were never coming back to them. Legends can be made and broken by the rider, this one is now broken.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28994255/ruby-walsh-shocking-ride?post_id=517481403#517481403</link><description>Commentary was garbage. Very steady pace for a Champion Hurdle and on fairly quick ground, the leaders were never coming back to them. Legends can be made and broken by the rider, this one is now broken.</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:11:13 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Commentator kept saying the first two home (who led all the way) were going a furious gallop etc... absolute tosh! Obviously they weren't going all that fast, if they had gone breakneck speed etc they would have faded and been swamped by the field. T</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28994255/ruby-walsh-shocking-ride?post_id=517481125#517481125</link><description>Commentator kept saying the first two home (who led all the way) were going a furious gallop etc... absolute tosh! Obviously they weren't going all that fast, if they had gone breakneck speed etc they would have faded and been swamped by the field. T</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:03:47 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Hah , still waiting for that mythical objectivity ,are we ?There'll be a revolution in porcine aviation before that day dawns.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28994255/ruby-walsh-shocking-ride?post_id=517481051#517481051</link><description>Hah , still waiting for that mythical objectivity ,are we ?There'll be a revolution in porcine aviation before that day dawns.</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:02:42 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>also, mullins has only had 2 winners in the last 2 weeks, maybe something not right with their horses.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28994255/ruby-walsh-shocking-ride?post_id=517480975#517480975</link><description>also, mullins has only had 2 winners in the last 2 weeks, maybe something not right with their horses.</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:01:17 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>apart from that ride on hf walsh has just become wrapped up in his own importance recently...reguarly giving smart a ss answers when gettin interviewd,,maybe if someone had the balls to say on tv that that was not his finest hour then he would take a</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28994255/ruby-walsh-shocking-ride?post_id=517480953#517480953</link><description>apart from that ride on hf walsh has just become wrapped up in his own importance recently...reguarly giving smart a ss answers when gettin interviewd,,maybe if someone had the balls to say on tv that that was not his finest hour then he would take a</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:00:41 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Horse not good enough on the day for some reason, imo, but quite how C4 think they actually can be objective about Walsh's riding, when they are smarming all over his Dad in the commentary box, is beyond me....</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28994255/ruby-walsh-shocking-ride?post_id=517480905#517480905</link><description>Horse not good enough on the day for some reason, imo, but quite how C4 think they actually can be objective about Walsh's riding, when they are smarming all over his Dad in the commentary box, is beyond me....</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:59:41 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Not good enough on the day.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28994255/ruby-walsh-shocking-ride?post_id=517480893#517480893</link><description>Not good enough on the day.</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:59:33 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Horse just didn't fire today,very warm beforehand and never travelled with its usual power,plenty far back alright but just didn't look the horse we know it is today.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28994255/ruby-walsh-shocking-ride?post_id=517480883#517480883</link><description>Horse just didn't fire today,very warm beforehand and never travelled with its usual power,plenty far back alright but just didn't look the horse we know it is today.</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:59:27 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>He's become the Jamie Spencer of the jumps - often gets his mounts too far behind, but it's Ruby Walsh so no one is allowed to criticize him. Did the same in the first, Prospect Wells was well behind and stayed on very strongly, never nearer.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28994255/ruby-walsh-shocking-ride?post_id=517480849#517480849</link><description>He's become the Jamie Spencer of the jumps - often gets his mounts too far behind, but it's Ruby Walsh so no one is allowed to criticize him. Did the same in the first, Prospect Wells was well behind and stayed on very strongly, never nearer.</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:58:31 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>it was a different race this year he didnt get away with it this year</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28994255/ruby-walsh-shocking-ride?post_id=517480753#517480753</link><description>it was a different race this year he didnt get away with it this year</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:55:51 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
