<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Gubbing 1.01 Data</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28918485/gubbing-101-data</link><description>For anyone interested...Trivia Q - which flat track has best profitability for 1.01 gubbing players ?i.e. If you laid &Acirc;&pound;1 on every horse in every race at 1.01 and left IR which track would have returned you the biggest profit ? Tweet reply to @Smarte</description><item><title>onlooker you are right, but lets say that you get everything matched, than still he's wrong. he says what would have made you the biggest profit, but he only looked at the most amount of gubbings probably (and not even that) and not gubbings to races</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28918485/gubbing-101-data?post_id=516347281#516347281</link><description>onlooker you are right, but lets say that you get everything matched, than still he's wrong. he says what would have made you the biggest profit, but he only looked at the most amount of gubbings probably (and not even that) and not gubbings to races</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:28:42 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Just the MINOR POINT that in many, many instances ...You would probably NOT get MATCHED, anyway - as - unless you, laboriously,  Pre-Set the ALL 1.01's  the DAY before  -You would probably be TOO FAR BACK IN THE QUEUE on many occasions.Loads of &Acirc;&pound;7,5</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28918485/gubbing-101-data?post_id=516346877#516346877</link><description>Just the MINOR POINT that in many, many instances ...You would probably NOT get MATCHED, anyway - as - unless you, laboriously,  Pre-Set the ALL 1.01's  the DAY before  -You would probably be TOO FAR BACK IN THE QUEUE on many occasions.Loads of &Acirc;&pound;7,5</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:18:33 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>actually on his blog he says it's KEMPTON, why do you guys say catterick?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28918485/gubbing-101-data?post_id=516346219#516346219</link><description>actually on his blog he says it's KEMPTON, why do you guys say catterick?</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:02:34 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>according to my data of all gubbings from 2004 until 2011, WOLV has the most, then KEMP, but they have a lot more races so that is not fair. percentage wise EPSOM has the most gubbings.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28918485/gubbing-101-data?post_id=516345457#516345457</link><description>according to my data of all gubbings from 2004 until 2011, WOLV has the most, then KEMP, but they have a lot more races so that is not fair. percentage wise EPSOM has the most gubbings.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:44:26 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>i wonder how they calculated thisthey added them up</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28918485/gubbing-101-data?post_id=516345323#516345323</link><description>i wonder how they calculated thisthey added them up</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:41:17 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I think they've included place markets too as Kempton was well ahead with around 46 place gubbings alone</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28918485/gubbing-101-data?post_id=516345243#516345243</link><description>I think they've included place markets too as Kempton was well ahead with around 46 place gubbings alone</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:39:33 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I think they've included place markets too as Kempton was well ahead with around 46 place gubbings alone</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28918485/gubbing-101-data?post_id=516345233#516345233</link><description>I think they've included place markets too as Kempton was well ahead with around 46 place gubbings alone</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:39:26 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I'd say Kempton</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28918485/gubbing-101-data?post_id=516345067#516345067</link><description>I'd say Kempton</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:36:11 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>i wonder how they calculated this, because my data says something else. which period have they tracked for 1.01 gubbings?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28918485/gubbing-101-data?post_id=516344633#516344633</link><description>i wonder how they calculated this, because my data says something else. which period have they tracked for 1.01 gubbings?</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:23:28 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>catterick bridge is correct.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28918485/gubbing-101-data?post_id=516342917#516342917</link><description>catterick bridge is correct.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:43:03 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
